PARKOUR PRACTIONER
L0RDS 0F LEGI0N
Damage LLC
4
   |
Posted - 2015.12.03 09:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mad Syringe wrote:The speed of Heavies is their disadvantage so it should stay as is. BUT, Overheat needs to c hange since it makes it just a big target easy to kill. Resistances are also a good point.
Scouts should not get more e-war capabilities, since they need a disadvantage, especcially when cloaked.
Running a SCOUT in the middle of heavy warfare in a city should be suicidal, and that's exactly what it is right now. The Assault should be the better suit for this scenario. Do not nerf active scanners whatsoever, or the scout will be reign supreme in city sockets again.
I think (as a non assault player) that the assaults are where they belong. Everybody and his mom complained how crap they where, so right now they are the most used suits and that is how it should be.
Logis right now are allrightish, and commandos aswell (though I miss my min bonus for swarms).
BTW, give min Commandos an AV weapon... (Breach MD needs either the firerate of the standard or more direct damage!!!)
A) Agreed sacrifice movement & EWAR for being a Walking turret
B) Remember too, the reason scouts were insane also because of EWAR being unchanged when cloaked, plus lack of cloak delays. EWAR blindness is OK with the cloak because the advantage of harder to see + extra dampening, can't have it all. I don't think scanners need a nerf as EWAR & bonuses should be balanced out between scouts.
PS, not every GS brick tanks with a bons
C) Amarr assault seems obselite? in comparison to the rest, but is the AA an Marksmans suit now or is it UP?
D) Logis have equal scans to scouts pre 1.8 (sorta). I think logis could use a base HP buff or something & EWAR nerf. SL are Cal tech, but i think they were also projectile making it min compatible. The thing I'm worried about is the Nk bonus, take the Swarms let us keep the knves please! Breach MD COULD use a DD buff, for AV only.
Example
Keep flat rate damage against infantry
10% buff to direct hits against vehicles per level IDK just an example
That's just MHO.
Easing from passive to aggressive player
MS & GS, CA, CM, GM, MA, GS, Kampo Logi AKA I is the sun yo
/Z)/V//V
|
PARKOUR PRACTIONER
L0RDS 0F LEGI0N
Damage LLC
4
|
Posted - 2015.12.03 17:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
No Shotty, leave the ferros & reactives alone. It's supposed to be a lightweight armor type, reactives have a penalty already, ferros don't but you sacrifice regen for a little buff that wont slow you down. As a GS that uses both I'm probably just bias.
I don't see anything wrong with the shield buff being cal assault, they do there job better now. GA nerf? IDK most GAs (that ive seen) just put a ARR on it anyway. Doesn't mean it doesn't need a nerf but the point of the buff was to encourage using the bonus/many said suit was UP.
If you buff or nerf anything too much the rock-paper-scissors won't apply, not sure what would happen if they stayed as is either.
Easing from passive to aggressive player
MS & GS, CA, CM, GM, MA, GS, Kampo Logi AKA I is the sun yo
/Z)/V//V
|