DUST Search - New high slot module

Text Grant wrote:

Saint Winter wrote:

Text Grant wrote:

Slatted plating- armor resistance module 5% basic 8% advanced 10% prototype.

Reasoning? To add a high slot armor module, like the shield regulator for the shields. I was thinking about the same CPU/ PG as the reactive plates. Oh, and of course, this item would receive a stacking penalty.

Hello i like your idea ,but as many say I need a balance Armor 2%, 4% and 8% would be good and the Shield 2%, 5% and 10%.

Armour in high module and the Shield module in low module, for better balace between these two antagonistic elements

and the limit of modules in the assembly is 2, because no matter if you put the penalty will also be stacked especially for players who likes to wear suits with specialization in shield as caldaris.

Sorry, but I disagree on your progression, and the whole reason I suggested it for armor only was to make up for shield already having a low slot module. If 8 is the max, it should be more like 5-7-8. Your progression is severely shorting the basic and advanced players.

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Text Grant PIanet Express 442	Posted - 2015.11.26 08:39:00 - [1] - Quote Slatted plating- armor resistance module 5% basic 8% advanced 10% prototype. Reasoning? To add a high slot armor module, like the shield regulator for the shields. I was thinking about the same CPU/ PG as the reactive plates. Oh, and of course, this item would receive a stacking penalty.
Megaman Trigger OSG Planetary Operations 922	Posted - 2015.11.26 11:24:00 - [2] - Quote Would give armour tankers something to choose other than damage mods. Purifier. First Class.
No-one-ganks like-Gaston Corrosive Synergy RUST415 408	Posted - 2015.11.26 11:57:00 - [3] - Quote 10% per module is way too much, even for proto. Slap those things on a Min or Am assault and you have a mobile tank. Put them on an AmSent and you have a less mobile, slightly more literal tank. I think maybe 6% per might be more reasonable, assuming something like this should even be allowed for infantry. The thought that Dust 514 may one day be the game we dreamed it to be. It fills you with Determination!
DIinkelFritz The Eternal Noxium Imperium 4	Posted - 2015.11.26 20:01:00 - [4] - Quote No-one-ganks like-Gaston wrote: 10% per module is way too much, even for proto. Slap those things on a Min or Am assault and you have a mobile tank. Put them on an AmSent and you have a less mobile, slightly more literal tank. I think maybe 6% per might be more reasonable, assuming something like this should even be allowed for infantry. Love the idea except completely, except that if we do it for armor, we need to have one for shields. Armor is already broken as it is compared to shields. Not gunna knock the idea, but shield and armor balancing needs to happen first. Committed suicide....again...
tritan abbattere DBAG CORE 69	Posted - 2015.11.26 20:46:00 - [5] - Quote I like the idea of adding more modules but do you want armor Resistance in the high slot? here is my reasoning. If its in the high slot not only can you stack buffer but Resistance. What happens when you run into a guy with 20%-35% Resistance in armor with 500 HP in armor. He would be really really hard to kill. As a logi I all ready do this. I think a heavy should have to choose to get Resistance or Buffer or a Mix. But stacking it could be really unbalanced. Other wise I think this would be a good module to add to the game. I personally wish they would add 5-10 new modules/equipment that do different things for both infantry and vehicles. I am the all mighty Tritan. Fear me for I am a MassHole
Megaman Trigger OSG Planetary Operations 923	Posted - 2015.11.27 15:12:00 - [6] - Quote Why not split the resistances? Shield resistance moda in highs and armour resistance in lows. Purifier. First Class.
tritan abbattere DBAG CORE 71	Posted - 2015.11.27 18:08:00 - [7] - Quote That would be perfect IMO. I am the all mighty Tritan. Fear me for I am a MassHole
Saint Winter Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 173	Posted - 2015.11.30 03:59:00 - [8] - Quote Text Grant wrote: Slatted plating- armor resistance module 5% basic 8% advanced 10% prototype. Reasoning? To add a high slot armor module, like the shield regulator for the shields. I was thinking about the same CPU/ PG as the reactive plates. Oh, and of course, this item would receive a stacking penalty. Hello i like your idea ,but as many say I need a balance Armor 2%, 4% and 8% would be good and the Shield 2%, 5% and 10%. Armour in high module and the Shield module in low module, for better balace between these two antagonistic elements and the limit of modules in the assembly is 2, because no matter if you put the penalty will also be stacked especially for players who likes to wear suits with specialization in shield as caldaris.
Text Grant PIanet Express 445	Posted - 2015.11.30 13:20:00 - [9] - Quote Saint Winter wrote: Text Grant wrote: Slatted plating- armor resistance module 5% basic 8% advanced 10% prototype. Reasoning? To add a high slot armor module, like the shield regulator for the shields. I was thinking about the same CPU/ PG as the reactive plates. Oh, and of course, this item would receive a stacking penalty. Hello i like your idea ,but as many say I need a balance Armor 2%, 4% and 8% would be good and the Shield 2%, 5% and 10%. Armour in high module and the Shield module in low module, for better balace between these two antagonistic elements and the limit of modules in the assembly is 2, because no matter if you put the penalty will also be stacked especially for players who likes to wear suits with specialization in shield as caldaris. Sorry, but I disagree on your progression, and the whole reason I suggested it for armor only was to make up for shield already having a low slot module. If 8 is the max, it should be more like 5-7-8. Your progression is severely shorting the basic and advanced players.
No-one-ganks like-Gaston Corrosive Synergy RUST415 453	Posted - 2015.11.30 13:37:00 - [10] - Quote Text Grant wrote: Saint Winter wrote: Text Grant wrote: Slatted plating- armor resistance module 5% basic 8% advanced 10% prototype. Reasoning? To add a high slot armor module, like the shield regulator for the shields. I was thinking about the same CPU/ PG as the reactive plates. Oh, and of course, this item would receive a stacking penalty. Hello i like your idea ,but as many say I need a balance Armor 2%, 4% and 8% would be good and the Shield 2%, 5% and 10%. Armour in high module and the Shield module in low module, for better balace between these two antagonistic elements and the limit of modules in the assembly is 2, because no matter if you put the penalty will also be stacked especially for players who likes to wear suits with specialization in shield as caldaris. Sorry, but I disagree on your progression, and the whole reason I suggested it for armor only was to make up for shield already having a low slot module. If 8 is the max, it should be more like 5-7-8. Your progression is severely shorting the basic and advanced players. Gonna be blunt with you. Have you seen most Standard and Advanced modules? And weapons? And equipment? Standard and Advanced already get shafted over half the time. It's one of the reasons Proto is such a big deal. Actually making Standard viable over Proto in any way other than ISK and PG/CPU cost doesn't seem like a thing that's going to happen. Although I wouldn't complain if it did, especially since that's primarily what I use. The thought that Dust 514 may one day be the game we dreamed it to be. It fills you with Determination!

Saint Winter Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 173	Posted - 2015.11.30 21:45:00 - [11] - Quote Text Grant wrote: Saint Winter wrote: Text Grant wrote: Slatted plating- armor resistance module 5% basic 8% advanced 10% prototype. Reasoning? To add a high slot armor module, like the shield regulator for the shields. I was thinking about the same CPU/ PG as the reactive plates. Oh, and of course, this item would receive a stacking penalty. Hello i like your idea ,but as many say I need a balance Armor 2%, 4% and 8% would be good and the Shield 2%, 5% and 10%. Armour in high module and the Shield module in low module, for better balace between these two antagonistic elements and the limit of modules in the assembly is 2, because no matter if you put the penalty will also be stacked especially for players who likes to wear suits with specialization in shield as caldaris. Sorry, but I disagree on your progression, and the whole reason I suggested it for armor only was to make up for shield already having a low slot module. If 8 is the max, it should be more like 5-7-8. Your progression is severely shorting the basic and advanced players. Hello. remember something progressions dust 514 are driven. Examples: Armor plates, shield recharger and energizer, knetic catalyzer, if you check their values are driven, of course if you do not want to take that into base. But just the modules percentages dust, and of course you can do something with a modifier style damage, look good, but if you are creating this module you should create one for shield and come to think of work, it would be best armor in low slots and shield in high slot. But in the end you take the desicion. Thanks for your review I think I saw some things better, thanks.
DIinkelFritz The Eternal Noxium Imperium 5	Posted - 2015.12.01 02:33:00 - [12] - Quote Megaman Trigger wrote: Why not split the resistances? Shield resistance moda in highs and armour resistance in lows. Since shields have low hp amount as it is compared to armor, and having armor resistance modules in the high slots would be Game breaking, why not have both resistance modules in the low slots. A shield user still has to give up reduced shield delay and armor has to give up its buffer to get the resistance bonus. Shields/armor balancing improvement and more modules to mix up. Win-win all around. Committed suicide....again...
Text Grant OSG Planetary Operations 446	Posted - 2015.12.01 12:49:00 - [13] - Quote DIinkelFritz wrote: Megaman Trigger wrote: Why not split the resistances? Shield resistance moda in highs and armour resistance in lows. Since shields have low hp amount as it is compared to armor, and having armor resistance modules in the high slots would be Game breaking, why not have both resistance modules in the low slots. A shield user still has to give up reduced shield delay and armor has to give up its buffer to get the resistance bonus. Shields/armor balancing improvement and more modules to mix up. Win-win all around. Shields just got buffed. Now you want another buff? Let armor get a high slot module. If you don't like resistance, add a better idea?


Pages: 1 :: [one page]