DUST Search - [ Suggest ] Planetary conquest revision

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

[ Suggest ] Planetary conquest revision

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
idlerowl Old-Type Loud and Dawn 57	Posted - 2015.11.09 17:08:00 - [1] - Quote o7 Mercs! Districts holder are no risks . To hold Many district ,it become easy to protect it and becomes without being frightened by danger. I want to do suggestion to make the cost that district maintenance costs. Cost is CP. The barrier of the district needs 200CP per hour. 4,000CP is necessary to functionalize a barrier normally per one day "The barrier of the district” named like “District charter” . “District charter” can buy marketplace by CP. If losing “District charter”,the invasion of the Pliantly conquest is in a possible condition regardless of time For Planetary conquest becomes with fun.
XxBlazikenxX Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 3	Posted - 2015.11.09 18:08:00 - [2] - Quote No, this is a stupid idea and dumb. It is a risk to have many districts. Why? Because so many people can attack you at the same time and you get stacked timers and have to field like 4 battles at once. And you never know which one of those battles the enemy will bring their A team. It is not easy to hold many districts. Under contract by the Amarr Empire Amarr Commando Forever Ancient Exiles. Member
TheD1CK Dead Man's Game 3	Posted - 2015.11.09 18:39:00 - [3] - Quote XxBlazikenxX wrote: No, this is a stupid idea and dumb. It is a risk to have many districts. Why? Because so many people can attack you at the same time and you get stacked timers and have to field like 4 battles at once. And you never know which one of those battles the enemy will bring their A team. It is not easy to hold many districts. lol... At anytime since hopping in to AE have you had to defend ALL your districts?? And you can't really complain about 4 battles at once when you have 5 districts on an hour. What he is getting at is to remove the ease of having so many, which would be good for PC. Though looking at his Corp, the issue he is addressing is Abyss of Universe and their domination of Asian timers. SOONtm
TheD1CK Dead Man's Game 3	Posted - 2015.11.09 18:43:00 - [4] - Quote I like the idea, having a constant CP drain for landholders.. so they have to consider what they really need. - It's not perfect, but it is in the right direction A suggestion I made was to multiply CP costs for using clones on stacked district timers - Launching clones from an 18.00 timer district (while owning another 18:00) would double CP costs This would make it tough to stack one timer, nevermind upto 10. SOONtm
XxBlazikenxX Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 3	Posted - 2015.11.09 20:23:00 - [5] - Quote TheD1CK wrote: XxBlazikenxX wrote: No, this is a stupid idea and dumb. It is a risk to have many districts. Why? Because so many people can attack you at the same time and you get stacked timers and have to field like 4 battles at once. And you never know which one of those battles the enemy will bring their A team. It is not easy to hold many districts. lol... At anytime since hopping in to AE have you had to defend ALL your districts?? And you can't really complain about 4 battles at once when you have 5 districts on an hour. What he is getting at is to remove the ease of having so many, which would be good for PC. Though looking at his Corp, the issue he is addressing is Abyss of Universe and their domination of Asian timers. Back in the war against skill of god it would not be unusual to have 6 to 7 different defenses in the same hour, and that is not counting the attacks. Under contract by the Amarr Empire Amarr Commando Forever Ancient Exiles. Member
g li2 Grupo de Asalto Chacal Rise Of Legion. 1	Posted - 2015.11.09 21:12:00 - [6] - Quote The ability of an elite corp of having districts should not be limited by changes in the game. This limitation should be brought about by improving the level of other corporations expend energy for it. I have good players, good strategy, win battles. Then I can have districts. Do not win battles. Will train the team. I will try to make progress. Simple and challenging SOMOS LEYENDA
idlerowl Old-Type Loud and Dawn 60	Posted - 2015.11.10 17:44:00 - [7] - Quote Thanks replies. PC is highest contents and elite can get the district. Yes I think so ,too. But some of many district holders are too many it and cannot manage it. And some of many district holders are unsuitable for the number of people. It is necessary to review it. District charter is showing a management skill . It is expansion without the end, or bring about profit solidly? CEO and members argue and decide directionality. I want to change a present stiffening state.
XxBlazikenxX Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 3	Posted - 2015.11.10 17:48:00 - [8] - Quote idlerowl wrote: Thanks replies. PC is highest contents and elite can get the district. Yes I think so ,too. But some of many district holders are too many it and cannot manage it. And some of many district holders are unsuitable for the number of people. It is necessary to review it. District charter is showing a management skill . It is expansion without the end, or bring about profit solidly? CEO and members argue and decide directionality. I want to change a present stiffening state. I do agree that PC needs a change. Now I don't know what kind of change, I'm not a numbers junkies, I just follow orders and fight for my corp. But it does need a change. Under contract by the Amarr Empire Amarr Commando Forever Ancient Exiles. Member
g li2 Grupo de Asalto Chacal Rise Of Legion. 1	Posted - 2015.11.10 20:04:00 - [9] - Quote It may be that a change is needed Is work of developers do a fun game for many players. A corp with 30 districts is not fun for other players who may not possess the 30 districts. SOMOS LEYENDA
XxBlazikenxX Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate 3	Posted - 2015.11.10 20:06:00 - [10] - Quote g li2 wrote: It may be that a change is needed Is work of developers do a fun game for many players. A corp with 30 districts is not fun for other players who do not own districts. PC is not meant to be fun. It is a game mode for serious players. Under contract by the Amarr Empire Amarr Commando Forever Ancient Exiles. Member

g li2 Grupo de Asalto Chacal Rise Of Legion. 1	Posted - 2015.11.12 08:24:00 - [11] - Quote XxBlazikenxX wrote: g li2 wrote: It may be that a change is needed Is work of developers do a fun game for many players. A corp with 30 districts is not fun for other players who do not own districts. PC is not meant to be fun. It is a *game* (Meaning of game: An activity providing entertainment or amusement) mode for serious players. SOMOS LEYENDA
idlerowl Old-Type Loud and Dawn 60	Posted - 2015.11.23 12:11:00 - [12] - Quote o7 I'm back. We get first district two weeks ago ,and lost yesterday. By 'unite serious players' . We challenge again and again. We wanna very serious players. But we feel some point should be improved. 1.Big corporation are in strain state each other. The present conditions are a friendship each other and maintain a safe position. Friendship is not bad . But we cannot enter it in this newly. 2.More districts or ' Level of district' I check DOTLAN several times . PC is in the oligopoly state. A selected thing fellow shares a limited territory. in safety. How about if I establish the level in the district? Like a clone vats,and quality. This method brings new movement in each corporation. 3district charter There are not the activity results, but a ghost company owning a district exists. The subsidiary of the Ally has many these phenomena. This problem must be solved. It must be shared with a more defiant player. We wanna serious players . But now , short of fun as contents only by the worthless exchanges being carried out on a decided rule. PC should more fun, and serious.
Balistyc Farshot MONSTER SYNERGY 445	Posted - 2015.11.23 16:28:00 - [13] - Quote The real problem which was not fixed in the changes, but they tried to fix them is that peace is more profitable than war for the larger corporations. There needs to be a constant motivator for war and fighting, especially among the land holding corporations. That mechanic is difficult to code and CCP hoped that bringing in more younger corps would fill the gap, but with lag being what it is, that is fairly impossible. I believe the best solution would be to reduce the timers like they discussed. Shorter timers, means more stacking which is the balancing criteria from this post. Then districts could change hands more easily because PCs would happen more commonly. People complaining about not being online to defend a district would then need to stop crying and take back the districts when they are back online. That would fix the problem from my stand point. More war and more districts changing hands. "Dying with your rep tool out - the logi-flasher!" Who hasn't been caught by a cute little female scout doing this?


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.