| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DEATH THE KlD
Imperfect - Bastards
658
   |
Posted - 2015.10.29 15:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
No I have no idea how to fix PC but if we get enough PC nerds in here I'm sure we can think of something..
1)lag/rubberbanding-this issue had gotten a lot better but it seems with the last update it went backwards
2)dropped matches-I heard this was fixed but it was still happening to FA (why I quit)
3)no shows-a legit tactic? Seriously? So is officer stomping in pubs..it needs to stop..you wait a day and make a plan 30 minutes in advance just for some dong to no show..waste of time
4)ssd's-they make a huge difference I have never lagged since getting one and actually spawn on time..but it still gets bent by rubberbanding..a player should not have to buy an ssd for better performance..that's silly
5)no incentive to fight..if you hold too much land then it does nothing for you..well you cap and no one wants to fight you then what? In the past all corps burnt out due to the wars but now no one cares..apparently incentive needs looking into..the current community doesn't care about "good fights"
6)ads and tanks need more of a role..ATM all they do is pull agro the best they can..not fun for vehicle users
7)fix DK market- it needs more than just boosters and skins..skins that can't be opened in a box
8)port dust..or scrap it and start over on PC ps4..your active players will be more than 2k if you did that..then you could eventually get cross platform play if you wanted...a fresh start for everyone
Feel free to post whatever
CEO of Imperfect Bastards and NF -Heimdallr69
Imps>NS>NF
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
2
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 15:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
5/ The main cause for no incentive to fight, is there is usually a group who make it pointless to do so
Not so long ago it was the Cap/RG/0H friendship ring.. as soon as that went, a new one took it's place via AE+FA
So if CCP added more incentive to fight (profits) there would not be enough to contest the top Corps making the most.
By so many top players going to the same Corps, it kills the will for people to fight back, I can't blame them.
1+2+3 are all valid concerns and 4!! the ssd is a pain, it stops many players from even considering PC as it hands a direct advantage to those that have them making unfair fights, I don't have one, I won't get one for my PS3 on the principle that I should not have to just to get an edge over others in battle.. how they could balance ssd v no ssd I have no idea.
CCP cannot do anything about /5 that issue lies with the players, but apart from that you raise good concerns and I hope someone at CCP takes notice as it is a shame to see so little made of what could be the best gamemode.
SOONtm
|
Emperor LOL
Kirkinen Risk Control
Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 16:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
PC sucks because whenever a corp starts building up to be a threat they get whipped off the map by the corps who have been in pc since the beginning.... you say you wan't fights but won't let anyone get strong enough to contest you....
Honestly once you have reached the top it should be your job to police PC and keep the newer corps active.
If I was Emperor of MH I would reinstate the last district rule, give the smaller corps a couple districts, help them defend it against big corps, but allow them to fight corps that are relatively their equal in ability until I deem them a true threat...
Also LAG. |
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
2
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 16:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Emperor LOL wrote:PC sucks because whenever a corp starts building up to be a threat they get whipped off the map by the corps who have been in pc since the beginning.... you say you wan't fights but won't let anyone get strong enough to contest you....
Honestly once you have reached the top it should be your job to police PC and keep the newer corps active.
If I was Emperor of MH I would reinstate the last district rule, give the smaller corps a couple districts, help them defend it against big corps, but allow them to fight corps that are relatively their equal in ability until I deem them a true threat...
Also LAG.
The problem here is the best don't do it for the game, they do it for themselves
Why burden themselves with responsibility when profits can be focused on instead ??
Not saying you are right/wrong.. just that no top team has ever really gave a damn it seems to me.
SOONtm
|
Dust User
Capital Acquisitions LLC
3
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 16:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
TheD1CK wrote:5/ The main cause for no incentive to fight, is there is usually a group who make it pointless to do so
Not so long ago it was the Cap/RG/0H friendship ring.. as soon as that went, a new one took it's place via AE+FA
So if CCP added more incentive to fight (profits) there would not be enough to contest the top Corps making the most.
By so many top players going to the same Corps, it kills the will for people to fight back, I can't blame them.
1+2+3 are all valid concerns and 4!! the ssd is a pain, it stops many players from even considering PC as it hands a direct advantage to those that have them making unfair fights, I don't have one, I won't get one for my PS3 on the principle that I should not have to just to get an edge over others in battle.. how they could balance ssd v no ssd I have no idea.
CCP cannot do anything about /5 that issue lies with the players, but apart from that you raise good concerns and I hope someone at CCP takes notice as it is a shame to see so little made of what could be the best gamemode.
How about instead of constantly spewing the same rhetoric about donuts you put the effort in to form your own and do something about it.
Then you could break it up and hand out your participation trophies you seem to love so much.
Dust User for CPM 3.
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
2
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 16:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dust User wrote:TheD1CK wrote:5/ The main cause for no incentive to fight, is there is usually a group who make it pointless to do so
Not so long ago it was the Cap/RG/0H friendship ring.. as soon as that went, a new one took it's place via AE+FA
So if CCP added more incentive to fight (profits) there would not be enough to contest the top Corps making the most.
By so many top players going to the same Corps, it kills the will for people to fight back, I can't blame them.
1+2+3 are all valid concerns and 4!! the ssd is a pain, it stops many players from even considering PC as it hands a direct advantage to those that have them making unfair fights, I don't have one, I won't get one for my PS3 on the principle that I should not have to just to get an edge over others in battle.. how they could balance ssd v no ssd I have no idea.
CCP cannot do anything about /5 that issue lies with the players, but apart from that you raise good concerns and I hope someone at CCP takes notice as it is a shame to see so little made of what could be the best gamemode. How about instead of constantly spewing the same rhetoric about donuts you put the effort in to form your own and do something about it. Then you could break it up and hand out your participation trophies you seem to love so much.
lol, to be nice I'll give you a participation like, thanks for taking part
It's funny, because players moan about lack of fights yet are the direct cause of the lack of fights, so it just continues to go around and around in circle(jerk)s and as much as I love you guys I try to avoid making a habit of staying up until 2am+ 
SOONtm
|
DEATH THE KlD
Imperfect - Bastards
661
|
Posted - 2015.10.29 17:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
TheD1CK wrote:Dust User wrote:TheD1CK wrote:5/ The main cause for no incentive to fight, is there is usually a group who make it pointless to do so
Not so long ago it was the Cap/RG/0H friendship ring.. as soon as that went, a new one took it's place via AE+FA
So if CCP added more incentive to fight (profits) there would not be enough to contest the top Corps making the most.
By so many top players going to the same Corps, it kills the will for people to fight back, I can't blame them.
1+2+3 are all valid concerns and 4!! the ssd is a pain, it stops many players from even considering PC as it hands a direct advantage to those that have them making unfair fights, I don't have one, I won't get one for my PS3 on the principle that I should not have to just to get an edge over others in battle.. how they could balance ssd v no ssd I have no idea.
CCP cannot do anything about /5 that issue lies with the players, but apart from that you raise good concerns and I hope someone at CCP takes notice as it is a shame to see so little made of what could be the best gamemode. How about instead of constantly spewing the same rhetoric about donuts you put the effort in to form your own and do something about it. Then you could break it up and hand out your participation trophies you seem to love so much. lol, to be nice I'll give you a participation like, thanks for taking part It's funny, because players moan about lack of fights yet are the direct cause of the lack of fights, so it just continues to go around and around in circle(jerk)s and as much as I love you guys I try to avoid making a habit of staying up until 2am+
I created the current donut to fight cap/oh/random guns..not our fault they broke when they realized they weren't actually good..Cap retired before that though
CEO of Imperfect Bastards and NF -Heimdallr69
Imps>NS>NF
|
DEATH THE KlD
Imperfect - Bastards
666
|
Posted - 2015.10.30 15:51:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bump
CEO of Imperfect Bastards and NF -Heimdallr69
Imps>NS>NF
|
Mortedeamor
The Black Masquerade
2
|
Posted - 2015.10.30 19:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
here we go here we go i have the grand solution
port the game to a MACHINE THAT CAN HANDLE IT
nuff said
pc master race
PORT IT CCP
|
Maken Tosch
DUST University
Ivy League
12
|
Posted - 2015.10.30 22:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Just so you guys can remember, PC 2.0 came about at a result of a very long collaboration between CCP Rattati and his Think Tank which consisted of a lot of players who are known directors or CEOs who have a deep understanding of the mechanics. They tested, exploited, adjusted, re-tested, re-exploited, again and again until they came up with a system that we now refer to as PC 2.0.
CCP Rattati was the one who personally asked players who were involved in PC to participate in the Think Tank. They knew from the beginning there will be corps willing to find exploits or ways to work around the system just like any typical Eve Online player would. They just wanted to find a system that is the least exploitable. So far PC 2.0 is the best system I can think of at the moment.
But int regards to the point the OP is trying to make, much of that can be resolved with porting Dust 514 to the next gen platform. The PS3 and the battle servers that can connect through it are just not good enough anymore and CCP has recently announced a major overhaul of their Tranquility Live server which Eve Online and Dust 514 connect to. Porting the game to the PS4 or to the PC will at least give CCP a chance to start from scratch and get rid of a lot of the bad legacy code that is still holding back Dust from progressing any further. Keep in mind that removing legacy code in any game is a monumental challenge, which is only made more complicated by any updates that try to compensate for it. The only practical solution is to rebuild the game from scratch if you want any guarantee of removing legacy code that is holding back Dust and ultimately PC 2.0.
As for dealing with players who form the blue donut rather than fight each other, I don't see any solution to that problem. Eve Online has had this problem since the day Eve Online existed which was 12 years ago. They have seen many changes by CCP to the sovereignty mechanics in an attempt to break up the blue donut but ultimately the null-sec alliances have always figured out a way around it. The blue donut seems to be here to stay whether we like it not.
Eve Online Invite
https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=ed64524f-15ca-4997-ab92-eaae0af74b7f&action=buddy
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |