Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Super Sniper95
Ancient Exiles.
863
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 15:53:00 -
[31] - Quote
Mortishai Belmont wrote:Sadly most doms are no where near as laggy s most skirm maps, I think that's the main factor. In the other hand, I feel less laggy skirm maps playing fw or pubs than dom maps. Dom its not bad, I mean if you are for a quick ending match you go for dom, but skirm if you wanna take your time to do anything. Plus skirm games fills a 16 v 16 game, one point towards skirm t.tO
Retired 100% Proud PubStar®
|
Lavallois Nash
Federal Transfers and Trades
562
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 17:04:00 -
[32] - Quote
Summa Militum wrote:Sicerly Yaw wrote:maybe the reason you leave is because you are garbage and not the other way around
if you dont like dom stop queuing up for it and suck it up don't complain about long timers or some silly excuse
I bet you leave any game mode that you think you'll lose
removing dom isnt going to solve anything and if people que it most often then maybe that's because more people prefer it
there's plenty of people that want to play the other game modes so squad up and que up and stop complaining, if so many people didn't leave matches because they apparently don't like it rather then having a legitimate reason to leave perhaps match quality would be better and the matchmaking algorithm would work like its intended to Dafuq is your problem?
Probably the same problem as everyone else lol. Here we have a guy that CHOOSES to leave the "Domination" option activated when searching for a match. Then he ragequits, cause you know, hes just too important to even try to play the map. Which, ruins it for the people that do want to play by leaving a side a man short.
Then he comes here onto the forums and says the whole mode should be abolished because its been ruined by people who quit before the match even gets underway. WOW.
All he would have to do is not queue for Domination, but no, hes too good for that. Its his right to queue for a mode he dosent want to play and leave it worse off with his sissy temper tantrum ragequitting. |
Krixus Flux
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
975
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 17:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Lol so in theory dude, they would play Skirm? Skirm is so lame. People like constant action instead of playing a digital game of Risk.
Saying what's on people's minds
|
Thor Odinson42
Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate
7
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 19:19:00 -
[34] - Quote
Lavallois Nash wrote:Summa Militum wrote:Sicerly Yaw wrote:maybe the reason you leave is because you are garbage and not the other way around
if you dont like dom stop queuing up for it and suck it up don't complain about long timers or some silly excuse
I bet you leave any game mode that you think you'll lose
removing dom isnt going to solve anything and if people que it most often then maybe that's because more people prefer it
there's plenty of people that want to play the other game modes so squad up and que up and stop complaining, if so many people didn't leave matches because they apparently don't like it rather then having a legitimate reason to leave perhaps match quality would be better and the matchmaking algorithm would work like its intended to Dafuq is your problem? Probably the same problem as everyone else lol. Here we have a guy that CHOOSES to leave the "Domination" option activated when searching for a match. Then he ragequits, cause you know, hes just too important to even try to play the map. Which, ruins it for the people that do want to play by leaving a side a man short. Then he comes here onto the forums and says the whole mode should be abolished because its been ruined by people who quit before the match even gets underway. WOW. All he would have to do is not queue for Domination, but no, hes too good for that. Its his right to queue for a mode he dosent want to play and leave it worse off with his sissy temper tantrum ragequitting.
If I leave a match it's because one side isn't fighting, whether that's my side or the other. I choose to not waste my play time in poor matches. The frustration comes from others not playing the map or the objective.
I don't understand your reasoning.
Seriously, port it.
Hurry
|
Thor Odinson42
Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate
7
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 19:20:00 -
[35] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:Powerh8er wrote:Ambush is worse. Way worse than domination. Just saying. I'm curious, why have so many good, previously unaffiliated mercs or people part of totally separate corps all joined up into AE? Would you not be better off somewhere else fighting against such corps as AE?
So you want people that are friends to not play together?
Seriously, port it.
Hurry
|
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance.
3
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 19:25:00 -
[36] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:It's gotten to the the point there is nothing else you can play.
And I leave 90% of them because they are garbage.
Why would something being the most popular be a reason for removal?
How about.....
FIX ALL THE OTHER GAME MODES AND FIX THE INCENTIVE TO FIGHT.
The only voice for a port is the voice of reason from money drying up.
More skins and 1% damage to keep Dust on PS3.
|
DEATH THE KlD
Imperfect - Bastards
460
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 19:38:00 -
[37] - Quote
Skirmish and bush are boring FW is nothing more than syncs..why should we be punished for not liking your game modes?
CEO of Imperfect Bastards and NF
|
StoneSmasher Drugga
Corrosive Synergy
195
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 19:40:00 -
[38] - Quote
deezy dabest wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:It's gotten to the the point there is nothing else you can play.
And I leave 90% of them because they are garbage.
Why would something being the most popular be a reason for removal? How about..... FIX ALL THE OTHER GAME MODES AND FIX THE INCENTIVE TO FIGHT.
This. Pride don't pay the bills. Winning needs to reward more, but losing can't be so bad people cut bait. It's a tricky problem.
There is no evil greater than hyperbole.
|
Thor Odinson42
Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate
7
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 19:43:00 -
[39] - Quote
deezy dabest wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:It's gotten to the the point there is nothing else you can play.
And I leave 90% of them because they are garbage.
Why would something being the most popular be a reason for removal? How about..... FIX ALL THE OTHER GAME MODES AND FIX THE INCENTIVE TO FIGHT.
It's a great question and is definitely the correct answer. However I'm not sure I have much faith that those efforts will take place. CCP has never really tweaked the dials to increase the action. They'd have to undo years of ingrained player behavior.
It used to be a lack of ISK that kept the masses down, they had to play conservative most of the time. But now with trading it's very easy to play very reckless while increasing wealth. Increasing payouts would make people so wealthy that it really wouldn't make sense to keep the asset loss model.
Seriously, port it.
Hurry
|
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP Evil Syndicate Alliance.
3
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 19:55:00 -
[40] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:deezy dabest wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:It's gotten to the the point there is nothing else you can play.
And I leave 90% of them because they are garbage.
Why would something being the most popular be a reason for removal? How about..... FIX ALL THE OTHER GAME MODES AND FIX THE INCENTIVE TO FIGHT. It's a great question and is definitely the correct answer. However I'm not sure I have much faith that those efforts will take place. CCP has never really tweaked the dials to increase the action. They'd have to undo years of ingrained player behavior. It used to be a lack of ISK that kept the masses down, they had to play conservative most of the time. But now with trading it's very easy to play very reckless while increasing wealth. Increasing payouts would make people so wealthy that it really wouldn't make sense to keep the asset loss model.
Increasing payouts is FAR from the answer I really hate that this is the only thing people go to when they here about payouts. I propose keep what you kill but that has its own flaws as well. Simply put we need to find a way to reward not just participation but actual effort.
Ambush is a fairly easy fix in my opinion. Limit it to 1 large city socket with the red line running around about 30 meters outside of that socket to allow for flanking and keep smart deploy just how it is.
Acquisition could use some adjustment to the timers and point rotation. I think it could be good with some tweaks.
Pub skirmish should be limited to 3 point maps only. Unfortunately it is a bit too much of a team mode to really make great in pubs but bringing it down to 3 points would help.
Remove base time in battle pay like yesterday. I propose base pay of 25k for a defeat and 100k for a victory. We can get back to participation incentive after that. This would seriously ramp up blue berry participation as well as making ADV gear far more viable as long as it is used for a victory.
The only voice for a port is the voice of reason from money drying up.
More skins and 1% damage to keep Dust on PS3.
|
|
Sicerly Yaw
Corrosive Synergy
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 21:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
go to the battle finder and when you are on the public contract tab press square scroll down to domination and click the box so that it doesn't have a check then press circle and que up
there problem solved, oh you don't like waiting? too bad suck it up and deal with it go play FW or PC or better yet go around to all the whining brats and tell them to do exactly what I said so that people can stop complaining about game modes they don't like
out of even less then 1k people I guarantee that at any given time there are at least 100 players queuing up for any given game mode so if you cant get in to the one you want then you are probably being too impatient and cancel out after 2 mins of waiting
if you want to guarantee that you can get into a battle quickly then que up for any losing side in FW as those timers are usually as low as 10 seconds
or you could help out and get reinforcement introduced so mercs can simply join ongoing matches without making others suffer from queuing directly into an ongoing one
the premise is simple team A has x amount of players more then team B you join directly into team B until A and B have the same amount of players and you get a list to choose from of the ongoing battles
squads would only be able to join matches that lack the amount of players in said squad or more so if you are in a squad of 2 then team A has to have at least 2 more players on their side if you are in a squad of 4 they have to have at least 4 and so on
incentives to join ongoing battles would be slightly higher payouts of even a fixed amount for winning say 100k isk and possibly extra SP
this would fix (or at least alleviate) two key things uneven matches 16v5 ect and long timers (you can que up for fresh battles or simply choose from ongoing ones to get in as quickly as possible)
I would suggest to not show the matches status other then amount of players and time elapsed since it started this way players wouldn't simply que up only for matches that they know they would benefit from but instead join any match they want in hopes of turning the tides and winning
Reserved
|
MidnightStormz
NervousMoment.
68
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 21:14:00 -
[42] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:It's gotten to the the point there is nothing else you can play.
And I leave 90% of them because they are garbage.
But I like dom
Badgerr Ragers alt.
I ain't scared like ya'll.
|
Thor Odinson42
Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate
7
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 22:59:00 -
[43] - Quote
Sicerly Yaw wrote:go to the battle finder and when you are on the public contract tab press square scroll down to domination and click the box so that it doesn't have a check then press circle and que up
there problem solved, oh you don't like waiting? too bad suck it up and deal with it go play FW or PC or better yet go around to all the whining brats and tell them to do exactly what I said so that people can stop complaining about game modes they don't like
out of even less then 1k people I guarantee that at any given time there are at least 100 players queuing up for any given game mode so if you cant get in to the one you want then you are probably being too impatient and cancel out after 2 mins of waiting
if you want to guarantee that you can get into a battle quickly then que up for any losing side in FW as those timers are usually as low as 10 seconds
or you could help out and get reinforcement introduced so mercs can simply join ongoing matches without making others suffer from queuing directly into an ongoing one
the premise is simple team A has x amount of players more then team B you join directly into team B until A and B have the same amount of players and you get a list to choose from of the ongoing battles
squads would only be able to join matches that lack the amount of players in said squad or more so if you are in a squad of 2 then team A has to have at least 2 more players on their side if you are in a squad of 4 they have to have at least 4 and so on
incentives to join ongoing battles would be slightly higher payouts of even a fixed amount for winning say 100k isk and possibly extra SP
this would fix (or at least alleviate) two key things uneven matches 16v5 ect and long timers (you can que up for fresh battles or simply choose from ongoing ones to get in as quickly as possible)
I would suggest to not show the matches status other then amount of players and time elapsed since it started this way players wouldn't simply que up only for matches that they know they would benefit from but instead join any match they want in hopes of turning the tides and winning
How about you stand up look down, take your hand and make a fist. Then punch yourself in the junk.
Seriously, port it.
Hurry
|
Powerh8er
Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate
937
|
Posted - 2015.10.08 14:08:00 -
[44] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:Powerh8er wrote:Ambush is worse. Way worse than domination. Just saying. I'm curious, why have so many good, previously unaffiliated mercs or people part of totally separate corps all joined up into AE? Would you not be better off somewhere else fighting against such corps as AE?
Many as I did, transferred from NF to AE. The rest that joined later are just fotm corphopping scrubs.
And you will know me by the trail of vomit.
|
Lavallois Nash
Federal Transfers and Trades
563
|
Posted - 2015.10.08 17:03:00 -
[45] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:
If I leave a match it's because one side isn't fighting, whether that's my side or the other. I choose to not waste my play time in poor matches. The frustration comes from others not playing the map or the objective.
I don't understand your reasoning.
The reasoning is simple; They arent playing because a few people with your mentality already left the game, leaving it unbalanced and discouraging everyone else from wanting to play it.
Maybe if there was a significant deterrent to people leaving 5 games in a row, game quality would improve, as people would try to make it work instead of going "Im such a good player, I refuse this challenge".
You were the one going months ago "HTFU" . What happened? When did your logic change from "Dealwithit" to "My playing time is so valuable, I will only play matches im heavily favored to win". |
Thor Odinson42
Ancient Exiles. Bleeding Sun Conglomerate
7
|
Posted - 2015.10.08 20:40:00 -
[46] - Quote
Lavallois Nash wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:
If I leave a match it's because one side isn't fighting, whether that's my side or the other. I choose to not waste my play time in poor matches. The frustration comes from others not playing the map or the objective.
I don't understand your reasoning.
The reasoning is simple; They arent playing because a few people with your mentality already left the game, leaving it unbalanced and discouraging everyone else from wanting to play it. Maybe if there was a significant deterrent to people leaving 5 games in a row, game quality would improve, as people would try to make it work instead of going "Im such a good player, I refuse this challenge". You were the one going months ago "HTFU" . What happened? When did your logic change from "Dealwithit" to "My playing time is so valuable, I will only play matches im heavily favored to win".
If I stayed and sniped it would be the same thing as leaving. WTF is one dude gonna do when there's nobody on your team within 200 meters of the ONLY objective?
Seriously, port it.
Hurry
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |