|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aeon Amadi
12
   |
Posted - 2015.09.27 04:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
My own 
Negative Introspection - Aeon's CPM Blog
Skype: nomistrav
|
Aeon Amadi
12
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 13:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
BARAGAMOS wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:My own Take note there Aeon..another thread mentioning myo abuse as the most common hated build. Maybe a few more and you guys might get the hint. The community is tired of them. Making them cost more may help, but making the items in the low slots cost less just means virtually no change. Really sad these did not get an actual numbers fix this time around. STACKED MYOS..... Fix this **** please.
How do I put this as delicately as possible.... I can't do it, I just gotta come out and say it: No, I'm not going to advocate the removal of myos. Like, you keep barking for a 'fix' in multiple threads like a broken record but your idea of a fix is still pandering to this "removal is the only way" thinking. Did you just completely glance over the Hotfix notes which did, in fact, have some pretty substantial changes to myos?
Considering most shield modules use CPU primarily, the higher PG costs will significantly weaken the capability of anything you're going to put in the lows apart from EWAR modules.
Negative Introspection - Aeon's CPM Blog
Skype: nomistrav
|
Aeon Amadi
12
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 18:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
BARAGAMOS wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:BARAGAMOS wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:My own Take note there Aeon..another thread mentioning myo abuse as the most common hated build. Maybe a few more and you guys might get the hint. The community is tired of them. Making them cost more may help, but making the items in the low slots cost less just means virtually no change. Really sad these did not get an actual numbers fix this time around. STACKED MYOS..... Fix this **** please. How do I put this as delicately as possible.... I can't do it, I just gotta come out and say it: No, I'm not going to advocate the removal of myos. Like, you keep barking for a 'fix' in multiple threads like a broken record but your idea of a fix is still pandering to this "removal is the only way" thinking. Did you just completely glance over the Hotfix notes which did, in fact, have some pretty substantial changes to myos? Considering most shield modules use CPU primarily, the higher PG costs will significantly weaken the capability of anything you're going to put in the lows apart from EWAR modules. No one wants them removed. They want them balanced. The PG costs are a start, but in the end do not restrict the jump height and speed. Lowering the lower slot modules PG costs just helps them balance the costs. So there is very little change. Watching assaults leap walls while still being 800+ ehp is a little hard to combat in CQC. Let alone the MD/Flaylock jumpers. All I am pointing out to you is the fact that it is mentioned A LOT as something players want changed. I know you run them on pretty much all your suits, but its time to move on from the bias and look at what the COMMUNITY wants. We want them fixed or as you said removed until they are. They are a great idea on paper, but a terrible influence on the actual game. The maps, angler of view, and aiming system can't handle them. That makes them an exploitable glitch.
Oh yeah? So your opinion changed then? And how do you even know if the PG costs are going to cull the numbers or not when the hotfix hasn't even been deployed yet...?
I told you before and I'll tell you again: I only have them fit on one suit and you're -NOT- going to win yourself any favors by blatantly ignoring that. You keep accusing me of bias and I'm going to show you some bias when I blacklist you. Don't say "no one wants them removed" and "or as you said removed until they are" in the same paragraph, it's contradictory.
Last warning, Baragamos, if you think I'm being unreasonable now you won't have to worry about it much longer.
Negative Introspection - Aeon's CPM Blog
Skype: nomistrav
|
Aeon Amadi
12
|
Posted - 2015.09.27 19:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
BARAGAMOS wrote:
Are you threatening me Aeon?
That's looks like some bad behavior kid for a CPM. As for the PG costs anyone can add. So its pretty easy to see what will happen. As for your one suit, you said yourself you use them on multiple suits. So, I took your word for it. If it's one then good for you, and I won't be so hard on you about it.
BTW I am including this thread in the email I am sending to CCP, NOT DUST, Customer service. They will not enjoy the CPM threatening to "blacklist" a customer. So it will most likely be you who won't have to worry about it anymore. I have already placed a nice service call for it as well.
I sincerely wish you luck in all of your endeavors, lol.
Negative Introspection - Aeon's CPM Blog
Skype: nomistrav
|
|
|
| |
|