*Holds microphone close to face and stands there dumbfounded for a few moments*.. .. .. ..

Hahahahha, okay bub... you OBVIOUSLY don't want to admit you read my post wrong....Let's skirt around it some more, you seem really good at dodging that issue and calling me the assumption king several different ways.

You do realize that YOU brought up my statement and MADE THE ASSUMPTION that I was saying the range was getting shafted.

I was saying that the swarms were getting SHAFTED [OFF OF THE MINMANDO] + overall nerf. Never said 'Range was getting SHAFTED' untill the next post just to mess with you!! Ya, dig?


I was just trying to tell a dissapointing tale about about my A/V suit that just wasn't meant to be... Then you have to come in here and MUCK IT ALL UP with YOUR ASSUMPTIONS and disregarding my disclaimer.

*Drops Mic* I'm done here.

That's exactly the reason I never wanted to use them.. Just seemed boring with the 'lock on and let it do the job' thing.

Just watching my team getting squashed by Proto Blaster Maddies over and over again.... enough is enough, stop beating on starter corp mercs with such cheap tactics.

So I decided to say SCREW IT, I don't care that they require much muhc MUCH less skill. I JUST WANT THESE TANKS SENT TO THE JUNK YARD ASAP.

Turns out it just wasn't meant to be.. I will let that 8mil SP sit there as a reminder that I was always meant to Forge and fire cannons

Just punch the tank.

I read that the breach only does 60% to vehicle's.

I said 'shafted off the Minmando' ( AKA, minmando is losing bonus) + overall nerf.




Oh and P.S. Aeon, from what I read it's not just the range, apparantly it's the 'hit-impact' and 'turning radius' as well


Shouldn't you know this stuff?

OR

Are you just trying to brush it under the rug?

I said 'shafted off the Minmando' ( AKA, minmando is losing bonus) + overall nerf.




Oh and P.S. Aeon, from what I read it's not just the range, apparantly it's the 'hit-impact' and 'turning radius' as well


Shouldn't you know this stuff?

OR

Are you just trying to brush it under the rug?

The minmatar having a bonus to swarms was never intended and almost everyone knew that anyways, you're trying to complain about 'sunk costs' when you skilled into something that you knew wasn't functioning as intended: You deserve what you got.

Now actually on topic - I'm more frightened at the prospect of breach mass driver minmando's than I am at calmandos with swarms, because the breach MD doesn't have a lockon time and it can be dumbfired at infantry, and the combat rifle is a more robust pairing with the swarm than the rail rifle variants are.

The minmatar having a bonus to swarms was never intended and almost everyone knew that anyways, you're trying to complain about 'sunk costs' when you skilled into something that you knew wasn't functioning as intended: You deserve what you got.

Now actually on topic - I'm more frightened at the prospect of breach mass driver minmando's than I am at calmandos with swarms, because the breach MD doesn't have a lockon time and it can be dumbfired at infantry, and the combat rifle is a more robust pairing with the swarm than the rail rifle variants are.

That's exactly the reason I never wanted to use them.. Just seemed boring with the 'lock on and let it do the job' thing.

Just watching my team getting squashed by Proto Blaster Maddies over and over again.... enough is enough, stop beating on starter corp mercs with such cheap tactics.

So I decided to say SCREW IT, I don't care that they require much muhc MUCH less skill. I JUST WANT THESE TANKS SENT TO THE JUNK YARD ASAP.

Turns out it just wasn't meant to be.. I will let that 8mil SP sit there as a reminder that I was always meant to Forge and fire cannons

Truthfully Romulus I'm not sure why many people would wish to use vehicles with the way things are going. Myofibrils will allow infantry to damage vehicles by punching them. I understand they make infantry super strong but soft tissue would be damaged with likely broken bones, I didn't hear anything about them taking damage as they melee vehicles. Then tanks have a larger hit box for the high damage area.

Truthfully Romulus I'm not sure why many people would wish to use vehicles with the way things are going. Myofibrils will allow infantry to damage vehicles by punching them. I understand they make infantry super strong but soft tissue would be damaged with likely broken bones, I didn't hear anything about them taking damage as they melee vehicles. Then tanks have a larger hit box for the high damage area.

I actually didn't realize just normal melee would be doing full damage to vehicles.

And I thought nova knives damaging vehicles was dumb.... I'm not sure what CCP wants from this game anymore but it's gotten.....weird.

Christ, the changes aren't even live yet.

If you're gonna yell at him about how badly the "Turn Radius" is going to affect it, at least WAIT UNTIL ITS LIVE TO START YELLING.

Everything until then is pure speculation.

The minmatar having a bonus to swarms was never intended and almost everyone knew that anyways, you're trying to complain about 'sunk costs' when you skilled into something that you knew wasn't functioning as intended: You deserve what you got.

Now actually on topic - I'm more frightened at the prospect of breach mass driver minmando's than I am at calmandos with swarms, because the breach MD doesn't have a lockon time and it can be dumbfired at infantry, and the combat rifle is a more robust pairing with the swarm than the rail rifle variants are.