|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Alcina Nektaria
KILL-EM-QUICK
Rise Of Legion.
214
   |
Posted - 2015.08.27 15:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
deo volente2 wrote:i passed over ceo of our corp to get us in an alliance, current ceo been awol, due to serious issues, asked ccp if they could help, they said NO, ok fair enough then, but why then do the same people who said no to that, WASTE TIME IN CHANGING IDIOTS NAMES WHO ONLY WANT TO CHANGE THEIR NAME SO THAT THEY CANNOT BE SILENCED ON COMMS AS THERE IS A 'GLITCH' THAT OCCURS AFTER THIS HAS BEEN DONE THAT MEANS SAID PESONS BUBBLE DOES NOT APPEAR IN ANY CHANNELS, C'MON YOU HELP TROLLS BE BETTER TROLLS BUT NOT ONE OF YOUR OLDEST CORPS, WAY TO HAVE A SENSE OF PERSPECTIVE GUYS, IT'S GOOD TO KNOW WHAT YOU WILL AND WILL NOT DO, thanks, just wanted to put this up so that everyone who reads this can see what you do for us, hope you get so many rrquests to change names for people that it keeps you busy changing names for years, seeing as you clearly enjoy aiding trolls who push other players away with their well trollish, childish behaviour, and by the way, i've played this game for years, but am the last to ever hear of these stupid little glitches, and you guys help make them possible, way to go ccp
There are other ways to get control of your corp back. Make an eve toon, have someone accept your app into corp, create a vote for shares, use shares to gain control back. Or hire someone to do it for you.
KEQ Diplomat and Director
ROFL. Diplomat and Red Button Pusher
|
Alcina Nektaria
KILL-EM-QUICK
Rise Of Legion.
229
|
Posted - 2015.08.27 19:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mad Kras wrote:CommanderBolt wrote:I totally understand CCP`s stance on what I am going to call Meta features of the game. They want to enable treachery, backstabbing, colluding, spying etc..
However the fair and simple answer and one that I think CCP might agree on is why not have a vote system? If the CEO is inactive for a certain period of time and a fair amount of time... (i.e does not fight any battles, logging in should not count) then the corp members / directors can initiate a kick vote or a vote for new CEO?
Sounds reasonable don't you think? You should write a thread about this in the new features and ideas section, that's good stuff although might be problematic since some corps have EVE characters as CEOs
There already is a voting system in place. You just have to do it from eve online since the whole corporation and alliance schematic was derived from there.
KEQ Diplomat and Director
ROFL. Diplomat and Red Button Pusher
|
Alcina Nektaria
KILL-EM-QUICK
Rise Of Legion.
230
|
Posted - 2015.08.27 19:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mad Kras wrote:Alcina Nektaria wrote:Mad Kras wrote:CommanderBolt wrote:I totally understand CCP`s stance on what I am going to call Meta features of the game. They want to enable treachery, backstabbing, colluding, spying etc..
However the fair and simple answer and one that I think CCP might agree on is why not have a vote system? If the CEO is inactive for a certain period of time and a fair amount of time... (i.e does not fight any battles, logging in should not count) then the corp members / directors can initiate a kick vote or a vote for new CEO?
Sounds reasonable don't you think? You should write a thread about this in the new features and ideas section, that's good stuff although might be problematic since some corps have EVE characters as CEOs There already is a voting system in place. You just have to do it from eve online since the whole corporation and alliance schematic was derived from there. But again, it's just from eve side, something like would be useful and should be also available in Dust, same goes for creating/joining alliances
It can't be done. They don't have the more extensive sandbox capabilites on a console that they have on pc. Aside from that, this was supposed to be integrated in eve in the first place (which is why Eve has more power with corporation and alliance management).
KEQ Diplomat and Director
ROFL. Diplomat and Red Button Pusher
|
Alcina Nektaria
KILL-EM-QUICK
Rise Of Legion.
231
|
Posted - 2015.08.27 19:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
deo volente2 wrote:Anaheim Darko wrote:Whoa - cool the hostility. CCP work hard.
If your CEO is awol, frankly that isn't CCP's problem. You'll need to resolve that internally. What is a CEO went on holiday, and the directors had CCP remove him in their absence?
Names get changed because that's simple code- AFAIK it's only caps that get sorted, and that sort of change would be easy in the database. Yes, the speech bubble glitch exists, and I'm sure it'll get sorted sometime.
I get your frustration, but venting at CCP isn't going to change anything. i never said they did'nt, they are clearly busy changing names around, and it's not been a few days or weeks, it's been months as he is gravely ill and clearly unable to waste time on games, and this is evident by all of his accounts being inactive, and he probably is'nt even goddamn well still paying for a subscription to a game he is not playing so what am i to do?, hack his inactive eve account, yeah right, just saying how ccp could help us with this problem, but will not, and like i've already said the excuse for not helping just is'nt valid and is frankly ridiculous and unfair, but as already been pointed out ccp encourage treachery and backstabbing, and yet they also want our money, mmmmmmmm, well it won't be from me, and you say the bubble glitch wll be sorted, well my friend it's been like that since the game was launched, so if it ain't been done by now, it never will
or....instead of crying and writing walls of tears, you could create a trial eve account and take the corp through creation of shares.
also i'm confused because originally you said you were the ceo but then you were claiming only to be a director and first it was only a couple weeks but now it's months that he's been inactive. you are confusing
KEQ Diplomat and Director
ROFL. Diplomat and Red Button Pusher
|
|
|
| |
|