Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK
General Tso's Alliance
2
   |
Posted - 2015.08.18 04:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
Apocalyptic Destroyerr wrote:17500.5.
(a) It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or association to falsely represent by advertisement the quantity of any article so advertised that will be sold to any one customer on his demand in a single transaction, and willfully or negligently to fail to include in such advertisement a statement that any restriction that is in fact put upon the quantity of any article so advertised that is sold or offered for sale to any one customer on his demand in a single transaction.
(b) Any person, firm, corporation, or association who, by means of such false or negligent advertisement or publicity, induces any individual retail purchaser and consumer to enter any place of business designated therein seeking to buy any article so advertised or publicized, and then refuses to sell to such person the article at the price advertised in any quantity then available for sale on said premises, shall be liable to each person so induced and refused, for the losses and expenses thereby incurred, and the sum of fifty dollars ($50) in addition thereto.
(c) Nothing in this section shall affect any right a seller may have to refuse to extend credit to a customer, and this section shall not be applicable to a customer purchasing for resale.
(d) The provisions of subdivision (b) are applicable only to actions brought in the name of, and on behalf of, a single plaintiff and shall not be applicable in multiple plaintiff or class actions.
OOoooohhhhhh, so thats why they nearly say nothing at all, because of shitweaseling dickfart lawyer-happy armchair-plaintiffs like you.
BTWs, you should go page through DUSTs EULA and ToS to realize you've already lost. If you actually understand what you're reading that is.
EDIT: added the word say to where it shouldve been
'As salty as salt can get.' how I describe the dust player base.
|
Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK
General Tso's Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2015.08.18 13:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Apocalyptic Destroyerr wrote:Mina Longstrike wrote:GM Archduke wrote:What's up, how can I help here? Pretty sure you cant. OP is quoting (american?) business laws about "false advertising"... like it somehow applies to dust and CCP has grievously hurt him or something. I think he fails to realize that he'd have a damn hard time winning a case in american court against an icelandic company over something that is treated as a service rather than a product. In effect CCP could say whatever they want about what they're going to do with this game and so long as they don't misrepresent the ACTUAL products you purchase from the PSN (aurum, combat packs, etc) an individual wouldn't have a snowballs chance in hell of winning a case against them. It's their game, you're just allowed to access it. *sighs* not where I'm going with this at all..
Then make your point known, instead of wasting everyone's time with this cryptic legalese bullsiht that reads like you want to sue ccp.
'As salty as salt can get.' how I describe the dust player base.
|