|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
3
   |
Posted - 2015.08.02 18:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:MockHolliday wrote:How easy is it for an alt corp to collect CP? If the CP is hard to earn these attacks would dry up rather quickly. I think a real solution is no show corps will be frozen for 'x' amount of days. Maybe 3?
You no show, you cant attack, maybe even have a progressive punishment. Chasing CP with alt corps is annoying and a time drain. it would subside. That penalty is avoidable by one dude visiting the battle.
Yes but you assume a no show is simply catagorized as no enemy players on the other team, a more exact definition could be exacted so that the no-showing team would have to go out of their way to qualify as a no-show but still inflict boredom.
It should more or less consist of
the team having less than 8 players
and/or
the team fails to hack any objectives
In both cases the enemy team is required to show up in force and even if a full team shows they must take some action they can't AFK in the MCC. I would have included a death by the agressors but if the defending team no-shows I wouldn't want the possibility of the attackers taking the penalty for the defenders no-show. |
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
3
|
Posted - 2015.08.02 18:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Since some of you believe this is working as intended I will tell you why it is flawed since the first step to solving a problem is identifying it. The whole idea of PC is huge risk huge reward, so why is their a no risk huge reward aspect put into the game.
No showing requires:
no isk
no players
no planning
no financial reprecussions
and since the no-showing corp has no districts their is no risk of retaliation
Reward:
Potential timer stack
Wearing down your opponent
Preventing clones from being moved which prevents
reinforcing weak districts and
launching attacks
if a corp wins a battle but has insufficient clones for an immediate re-up and their district to launch the re-up is tied up w/ a no-show they must either start over letting them regen essentially voiding a battle or lose 30mil by throwing a clone pack at it.
the no-show may prevent the sale of clones at a more tactical time
|
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
3
|
Posted - 2015.08.02 19:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Devadander wrote:Omg the tear collection factor in this thread is impossible to gauge!
My HAV are fueled for the next millennium.
Honestly. All I see is "why are so tuff to hold 20 districts? Stahp making us du theengs. QQ QQ NOT FAIR"
lol you talk about people with districts having to do things but the No-showing corp has to do nothing the hypocrosy is real. |
Benjamin Ciscko
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
3
|
Posted - 2015.08.02 20:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Alaika Arbosa wrote:Devadander wrote:Omg the tear collection factor in this thread is impossible to gauge!
My HAV are fueled for the next millennium.
Honestly. All I see is "why are so tuff to hold 20 districts? Stahp making us du theengs. QQ QQ NOT FAIR"
I think it is hilarious too. No, you can't come up with creative ways to fight us that don't fit into our paradigm of fighting!! No fair, you should be forced to fight us on our terms so we can feel good about ourselves rather than imploding due to boredom until we just give up and you can take our District when we no-show because you've successfully trained us to not pay attention!! I Love this thread.
I would rather fight my way to defeat than no-show my way to victory. We are not disputing the tactic we are disputing the no-risk factor, he very foundations of PC wre built on Risk vs. Reward so why should we allow a system that does not follow that. What bothers me the most is that your wrong their is no long drawn out meta the smaller corps just can't beat the larger corps in PC, Pubs, or Fac war so the only way to fight is to not fight if the at least had an end game you could credit them with that but their is no end game, no conquest, just an abuse of the system people are exploiting the system but not for monetary game but to destroy PC in itself. |
|
|
| |
|