Omg the tear collection factor in this thread is impossible to gauge!

My HAV are fueled for the next millennium.



Honestly. All I see is "why are so tuff to hold 20 districts? Stahp making us du theengs. QQ QQ NOT FAIR"

I think it is hilarious too.

No, you can't come up with creative ways to fight us that don't fit into our paradigm of fighting!!

No fair, you should be forced to fight us on our terms so we can feel good about ourselves rather than imploding due to boredom until we just give up and you can take our District when we no-show because you've successfully trained us to not pay attention!!

I Love this thread.

/facepalm

Just because you say that they have no end game doesn't mean that they have no end game. It means that you want to paint them as mission grinders who simply want to waste your time and have no long term strategic goals (i.e no long drawn out meta) which will be accomplished by training you to ignore their attacks.

How do you know that they don't have a long drawn out meta? Are you really the alt of some small corp scrub who really has no real PC plans?

You're also wrong about there being no risk for the no-show attackers. What if the District is attacked and seized by some other corp? They've effectively lost their opportunity to weaponize boredom against you since you've lost the District before they've had the chance to take it from you with their real attack. Now they'd need to go through the whole process again with the second corp; again risking that they will lose the opportunity to another corp.

It is the long gamble, not my fault you're unable to see that.

I am the operator. We're a group of about 8 buds in a casual corp. Me and my directors are loaded from assets/long time play. We play pubs in mostly bpo to keep it real and keep isk positive.

This is most of the corps that don't pc.


We really don't want to be tied to defending a district constantly. Raiding is fun and lucrative. (More than pubs/fw anyway) I don't want to lead any revolutions honestly.

I see some 1v16 matches in my future. Can't wait.

And still think no-show is a valid tactic. Just not so much for me.

Sad truth is we all know about pc macros, throttling, web tethers, equipment spam, suit changing constantly, explosion spam, general nastiness.

The ability to pay for ringers, bribes, eve support, unlimited ads/HAV, etc.

All time zones covered.


Even with an A game, nobody can compete...


I'll bet alot of these no shows are from farm corps, probably people you know and don't very much care for. Some would say it was asked for.


After years of blue donut style control, what do you expect?
Already gathering to discuss changes to a system put in place to wear you down...

I'll be done with this game.

Is that what this is about?

You guys are hoping for fresh blood in the PC game since you're all too sick of playing together/against one another so you need the fresh blood so you can extort payment for ringing out of the new guys?

I still find it amusing how much people complain about lag and [FILL_IN_THE_BLANK] ARE OP NERF! NERF!! and then try to say that this game is meant to be competitive.

Last night there was a thread about BlOps2 and how it (or any other COD) never lags but Dust lags terrible.

This game is a game, it is meant to be fun. It is no where near competitive now and nor will it ever be until we're playing it on LANs or have literally instant telecomms.

I just think it is hilarious how the chest beaters get over this game when there are other things that can (and should) be used for chest beating purposes rather than this game we all play.