ISKs shouldn't buy invicibility and super powers.

ISK however should buy greater battlefield efficiency. That is more or less the purpose of it. As for your balancing suggestion neither will benefit the Large Blaster in its intended role for the weapon itself has long been inappropriate as a tank main gun.

It's not "too effective at killing infantry." It's utterly sh*t for killing infantry. Tank drivers are fitting the active mod that makes them shoot straight, and the ones who do it sacrifice their ability to use the nigh unto biblically difficult to kill madrugars.

So no, the premise of this post is pretty bad.

Adipem this post comes off like:

"You make good counterpoints! But we're going to ignore them in favor of discussing how we're going to nerf your sh*t."

This is the source of 99% of hostile reactions to your posts. Might want to check how you phrase things.

Then I have absolutely no respect for this line of argument and will not bother trying to be civil, because that tack of debate is ass. I consider the people who consider it acceptable it to be self-entitled little pricks barely worthy of notice much less respect.

I see you didn't read my posts about blasters requiring a dispersion mod. Good show.

And bluntly, low to mid HP suits die fast. It's what they do. It's not unfair. It's the price you pay for your fitting choices.

Every suit has strength and weakness. Low base HP suits have higher mobility but pay for that with fragility.

And bluntly I think your penchant gor demanding nerfs for every damn thing under the sun is annoying as sh*t. Never once in the last three months can I recall you suggesting that something be brought up to match the competition. Just incessant demands that this be nerfed, that be nerfed, and your argument is always "low HP suits."

Low HP suits are fragile. Working as intended, move the f*ck along.