|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Roman837
Murphys-Law
1
   |
Posted - 2015.07.29 15:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
...I am shocked the **** posted this. He pretty much just said he's happy li ing in a care bear game. Where no one has any ambition. Also...you may be right that ccp won't even acknowledge it. But maybe they will. Maybe they will add us to yhe lore of eve. They have done that with eve corps who conquered entire systems. It should be every leaders goal to strive for 109 percent. If not why are you playing a war game?
Yes. This will create sides and there will be lots of pcs. It will take huge amounts of planning which to sum of us is the best part of the game.
Last time we reached 99%. OH was not with us..and the only reason we didn't achieve it was the last district was being perms locked by like 30 people spamming it lol. And then egos turned on each other and civil war broke out. And guess what. That civil war was amazing. It created rich history.
So don't worry. I understand why DMG doesn't want to get involved. They are already the bottom of the barrel when it comes to being considered anything like a impressive team. Glad you will be on yhe other side as it will make things that much easier.
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Character Cesar Sousa
|
Roman837
Murphys-Law
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 16:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
D4GG3R wrote:People obviously don't remember that the DNS Era was the second most stagnant time in PC history. The only thing it created content for was 0H, What the French, and everyone farming their districts in DNS. This is literally the dumbest way you could think of in order to retain player base and create fights. So much so that I completely thought this whole thing was a big joke for about the first 3 or so threads.
The end waa stagnant. Correct. The beginning was intense. And lasted 2 weeks of constant pc. The opposition gave up and instead of fighting and reattach ignore to take back districts they decided to just block the war by locking districts.
So. Yes they exploited the game to stop people from "winning"
The goal of 100 percent should be everyone's goal. And that means fighting other people who also want 100 percent. This will create fights.
No one should rolls over and quit. But it will happen because half the people who play this game are younger than 25 and have grown up in the era of getting participation ribbons...and breaking up good teams of kids for soccer or any sport so the ****** kids can have fun.
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Character Cesar Sousa
|
Roman837
Murphys-Law
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 16:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
D4GG3R wrote:Roman837 wrote:...I am shocked the **** posted this. He pretty much just said he's happy li ing in a care bear game. Where no one has any ambition. Also...you may be right that ccp won't even acknowledge it. But maybe they will. Maybe they will add us to yhe lore of eve. They have done that with eve corps who conquered entire systems. It should be every leaders goal to strive for 109 percent. If not why are you playing a war game?
Yes. This will create sides and there will be lots of pcs. It will take huge amounts of planning which to sum of us is the best part of the game.
Last time we reached 99%. OH was not with us..and the only reason we didn't achieve it was the last district was being perms locked by like 30 people spamming it lol. And then egos turned on each other and civil war broke out. And guess what. That civil war was amazing. It created rich history.
So don't worry. I understand why DMG doesn't want to get involved. They are already the bottom of the barrel when it comes to being considered ambitious. Glad you will be on yhe other side as it will make things that much easier The civil war created 0 content for anyone but those involved in DNS once again, as well as 0H. Further proof that the little guys in dust don't have a single thing to gain from this little whim to take 100%. not to mention the shear amount of time it will take to take all of those districts with the CP system. Months, maybe even a year.
Waa this during your corp hopping phase? Where you left FA because they didn't field you? Because there were tones of fights.
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Character Cesar Sousa
|
Roman837
Murphys-Law
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 16:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Shadowed Cola wrote:D4GG3R wrote:Roman837 wrote:...I am shocked the **** posted this. He pretty much just said he's happy li ing in a care bear game. Where no one has any ambition. Also...you may be right that ccp won't even acknowledge it. But maybe they will. Maybe they will add us to yhe lore of eve. They have done that with eve corps who conquered entire systems. It should be every leaders goal to strive for 109 percent. If not why are you playing a war game?
Yes. This will create sides and there will be lots of pcs. It will take huge amounts of planning which to sum of us is the best part of the game.
Last time we reached 99%. OH was not with us..and the only reason we didn't achieve it was the last district was being perms locked by like 30 people spamming it lol. And then egos turned on each other and civil war broke out. And guess what. That civil war was amazing. It created rich history.
So don't worry. I understand why DMG doesn't want to get involved. They are already the bottom of the barrel when it comes to being considered ambitious. Glad you will be on yhe other side as it will make things that much easier The civil war created 0 content for anyone but those involved in DNS once again, as well as 0H. Further proof that the little guys in dust don't have a single thing to gain from this little whim to take 100%. not to mention the shear amount of time it will take to take all of those districts with the CP system. Months, maybe even a year. This is both untrue and true at the same time. A lot of you seem to be forgetting PFC existed still in this time line, it wasn't taken out till the last weeks to get the full 100%. After DNS fell a part and AE took control of all the land any of the small corps could of gotten content if they wanted, for almost no price. None of them stood up to get that content that was WIDELY available for them. it's not DNS's fault the noobs are all idiots.
Smartest thing you've ever said.
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Character Cesar Sousa
|
Roman837
Murphys-Law
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 17:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
D4GG3R wrote:Roman837 wrote:D4GG3R wrote:Roman837 wrote:...I am shocked the **** posted this. He pretty much just said he's happy li ing in a care bear game. Where no one has any ambition. Also...you may be right that ccp won't even acknowledge it. But maybe they will. Maybe they will add us to yhe lore of eve. They have done that with eve corps who conquered entire systems. It should be every leaders goal to strive for 109 percent. If not why are you playing a war game?
Yes. This will create sides and there will be lots of pcs. It will take huge amounts of planning which to sum of us is the best part of the game.
Last time we reached 99%. OH was not with us..and the only reason we didn't achieve it was the last district was being perms locked by like 30 people spamming it lol. And then egos turned on each other and civil war broke out. And guess what. That civil war was amazing. It created rich history.
So don't worry. I understand why DMG doesn't want to get involved. They are already the bottom of the barrel when it comes to being considered ambitious. Glad you will be on yhe other side as it will make things that much easier The civil war created 0 content for anyone but those involved in DNS once again, as well as 0H. Further proof that the little guys in dust don't have a single thing to gain from this little whim to take 100%. not to mention the shear amount of time it will take to take all of those districts with the CP system. Months, maybe even a year. Waa this during your corp hopping phase? Where you left FA because they didn't field you? Because there were tones of fights. I left FA pretty DNS because they no showed all of their PCS and let AE take their districts. I was in Opus Arcana. A little corp
Yes I remember where you went. As I always tried to get you in on my pcs.
This idea for 100 percent. Should be fought for and fought against. It's going to force people to fight. That is a good thing. And as Ghost said. ..after 100 percent is achieved. ..it's what the winners do that's good or bad. I'd want to dump 80 percent of then. Like a reset.
Either way this idea has made me want to play again. And that's a big deal because I honestly thought I was done with dust. I'm getting back my ps3 from a friend this weekend and reinstalling Dust.
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Character Cesar Sousa
|
Roman837
Murphys-Law
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 17:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Shadowed Cola wrote:Roman837 wrote:Shadowed Cola wrote:D4GG3R wrote:Roman837 wrote:...I am shocked the **** posted this. He pretty much just said he's happy li ing in a care bear game. Where no one has any ambition. Also...you may be right that ccp won't even acknowledge it. But maybe they will. Maybe they will add us to yhe lore of eve. They have done that with eve corps who conquered entire systems. It should be every leaders goal to strive for 109 percent. If not why are you playing a war game?
Yes. This will create sides and there will be lots of pcs. It will take huge amounts of planning which to sum of us is the best part of the game.
Last time we reached 99%. OH was not with us..and the only reason we didn't achieve it was the last district was being perms locked by like 30 people spamming it lol. And then egos turned on each other and civil war broke out. And guess what. That civil war was amazing. It created rich history.
So don't worry. I understand why DMG doesn't want to get involved. They are already the bottom of the barrel when it comes to being considered ambitious. Glad you will be on yhe other side as it will make things that much easier The civil war created 0 content for anyone but those involved in DNS once again, as well as 0H. Further proof that the little guys in dust don't have a single thing to gain from this little whim to take 100%. not to mention the shear amount of time it will take to take all of those districts with the CP system. Months, maybe even a year. This is both untrue and true at the same time. A lot of you seem to be forgetting PFC existed still in this time line, it wasn't taken out till the last weeks to get the full 100%. After DNS fell a part and AE took control of all the land any of the small corps could of gotten content if they wanted, for almost no price. None of them stood up to get that content that was WIDELY available for them. it's not DNS's fault the noobs are all idiots. Smartest thing you've ever said. I like to think the Jinx'd Daily one of my better works. Shame Black Ice took that from me, lol.
Haha we have different views on that news paper. Mainly because I was your main target lol. Very clever tho. Made me chuckle inside but had to put on the show for the troops of being offended. Part of the gamr
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Character Cesar Sousa
|
Roman837
Murphys-Law
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 18:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote:Roman837 wrote:
And as Ghost said. ..after 100 percent is achieved. ..it's what the winners do that's good or bad. I'd want to dump 80 percent...
Am I reading this correctly? Given an opportunity to you would not look to relinquish 100% of the earned districts after taking 100% but instead would look to do some other amount and retain some set other amount?
This is what you read. If a team achieves 100 percent. They deserves to retain some and then continue fighting. I'd hold 100 percent for 1 days...ssoak it all in..then delete clones on 80 percent leaving them free and open un opposed so others could take them. Then. With the left over 2 percent...I would play the game. The corp would probly collapse after that and people would go back to old corps or cut out their own chunk. It would be amazing
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Character Cesar Sousa
|
Roman837
Murphys-Law
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 21:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
My goals align with his in the matter that we work together and achieve 100 percent. After that I hope an epic civil war breaks out with great fights with fun and mutual respect.
But that's future Molden Heath problem
For now I simple will ally myself with 50 and his goals and I hope I can lend my weight and experience to his cause aswell as bringing some of my old friends to the party. I am not high jacking his cause.
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Character Cesar Sousa
|
Roman837
Murphys-Law
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.29 23:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
dusty5678 wrote:Ghost Kaisar wrote:TheD1CK wrote:Cavani1EE7 wrote:TheD1CK wrote:
The problem with staging MH into a platform for good fights is... players would have to fight tougher battles, who wants that??
I do The only way it will ever happen is if the players make it happen...OR We make such a mess that CCP have to add padded walls to the playground. WTF do you think they're doing? Listen, going for 100% creates fights. Because it is literally forcing people to fight for their districts. People take sides. Players switch sides. CONTENT HAPPENS. CCP have already added padded walls to the playground anyways, might as well have some fun. The point is to get fights? Have fun fighting corps full of scrubs and noobs who were given a district by 0.h or even DMG. That sounds like a really good fight right there. I'm against 100% because the only good fights are against the elitist corps. IDC really all you fucks can do whatever. You won't be receiving a single district from 0.h though, whether you try take it or ask for it.
Wernt you from game or nae? The fact that you're in OH and some how speaking for them shows how far the game has sunk. I have always had such respect for OH. They are old school and I've seen them go through some tornadoes of changes. Zaria is a very smart player and fun to talk with...I wonder why she's allowing you to talk for the corp.
Either way..I'm sure there's more than a few people currently in OH who would love to fight for 100%.
Maple Syrup Drinking Canadian, EVE Character Cesar Sousa
|
|
|
| |
|