|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
257
   |
Posted - 2015.07.22 13:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Shields need a buff. But id like to stress to any CCP Devs who might read this that buffing shields:
DOES NOT CALL FOR A NERF TO ARMOUR.
^ I hope this is clear. Its your number one mistake, you buff one thing, then you nerf the other creating a constant imbalance between them.
Now to start my idea.
1.Shield HP.
I suggest that changing all core shield extender skills to 5% instead of 2%. This will make Shields a little meatier while not having to change the extender modules massively.
2. Regulators
Buff the complex to 50% reduction
Enhanced to 35% reduction
Basic to 25% reduction of depleted and delay.
3. Energizers and rechargers
A small buff in regen wouldn't go a miss. But I think it needs a CPU fitting reduction. I dont have the numbers handy to make a detailed assessment but something along those lines would be handy.
4. Threshold
6hp is useless and I think this is a really cool feature. I would suggest at least 50HP thresh hold which can be increased with a new module, or even a bonus added to extenders or rechargers but not energizers.
Im open to suggestions and criticism.
These are an initial idea of numbers and are there to be discussed.
But I must stress again in the chance a DEV sees this.
DO NOT NERF ARMOUR IF YOU DECIDE TO BUFF SHIELDS!!!!
|
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
259
|
Posted - 2015.07.23 12:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yeah I agree, 50 might be too high, but I was thinking that fifty would be the max number with the module bonus but even then it is quite high.
I like 14. I think its a good modest number. Im sick of getting killed by hmg at range. 6 threshold isnt enough is my point.
|
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
262
|
Posted - 2015.07.26 18:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Bump
|
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
263
|
Posted - 2015.07.26 18:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:tffvbhb wrote:
your right and with 50 threshold a HMG would be completely useless at anything other than very close range and still couldn't be doing that well
... ... ... ... 50 threshold is too much... But damn you are mistaken about how dangerous the HMG would be to this.
Yeah I admitted 50 was too much.
Someone suggested 14 and that could maybe be boosted to a max of 25 with modules. |
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
263
|
Posted - 2015.07.26 18:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
Omaarion27 wrote:Kiiran-B wrote:Shields need a buff. But id like to stress to any CCP Devs who might read this that buffing shields:
DOES NOT CALL FOR A NERF TO ARMOUR.
^ I hope this is clear. Its your number one mistake, you buff one thing, then you nerf the other creating a constant imbalance between them.
Now to start my idea.
1.Shield HP.
I suggest that changing all core shield extender skills to 5% instead of 2%. This will make Shields a little meatier while not having to change the extender modules massively.
2. Regulators
Buff the complex to 50% reduction
Enhanced to 35% reduction
Basic to 25% reduction of depleted and delay.
3. Energizers and rechargers
A small buff in regen wouldn't go a miss. But I think it needs a CPU fitting reduction. I dont have the numbers handy to make a detailed assessment but something along those lines would be handy.
4. Threshold
6hp is useless and I think this is a really cool feature. I would suggest at least 50HP thresh hold which can be increased with a new module, or even a bonus added to extenders or rechargers but not energizers.
Im open to suggestions and criticism.
These are an initial idea of numbers and are there to be discussed.
But I must stress again in the chance a DEV sees this.
DO NOT NERF ARMOUR IF YOU DECIDE TO BUFF SHIELDS!!!!
i like this idea you have not changed the ehp of extenders but an innovative way to increase the hp: genius i dunno why ccp even thought 6hp was a good idea when i saw that i laughed it needs to be able to soak up one round 5. possibly a cpu and pg decrease because those complex extenders be thirsty
Have your first like, sir!
Yeah the complex extenders are a lot.
|
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
263
|
Posted - 2015.07.26 18:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Oh my! My first fan! Ill cherish you always. |
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
265
|
Posted - 2015.07.26 20:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
tffvbhb wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:tffvbhb wrote:
your right and with 50 threshold a HMG would be completely useless at anything other than very close range and still couldn't be doing that well
... ... ... ... 50 threshold is too much... But damn you are mistaken about how dangerous the HMG would be to this. 50 threshold with 130hps shield recharge have you seen someone with a core focused rep tool on them??? You could have that but without a rep tool on you
Can I ask what you're talking about?
130hp/s regen?
Elaborate please. |
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
269
|
Posted - 2015.07.27 10:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bumpety bump bump. |
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
270
|
Posted - 2015.07.27 15:27:00 -
[9] - Quote
achoo! |
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
271
|
Posted - 2015.07.27 15:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jerome Kersey DVBKMGMT wrote:Kiiran-B wrote:Bumpety bump bump. I do not like your nubb'ry
I donGÇÿt like choGÇÿ mama |
|
|
Kiiran-B
Seraphim Initiative.
281
|
Posted - 2015.07.28 12:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jerome Kersey DVBKMGMT wrote:Kiiran-B wrote:Shields need a buff. But id like to stress to any CCP Devs who might read this that buffing shields:
DOES NOT CALL FOR A NERF TO ARMOUR.
^ I hope this is clear. Its your number one mistake, you buff one thing, then you nerf the other creating a constant imbalance between them.
Now to start my idea.
1.Shield HP.
I suggest that changing all core shield extender skills to 5% instead of 2%. This will make Shields a little meatier while not having to change the extender modules massively.
2. Regulators
Buff the complex to 50% reduction
Enhanced to 35% reduction
Basic to 25% reduction of depleted and delay.
3. Energizers and rechargers
A small buff in regen wouldn't go a miss. But I think it needs a CPU fitting reduction. I dont have the numbers handy to make a detailed assessment but something along those lines would be handy.
4. Threshold
6hp is useless and I think this is a really cool feature. It was suggested at least 14HP thresh hold which can be increased with a new module, or even a bonus added to extenders or rechargers but not energizers.
5. PG & CPU cost of extenders
A reduction is needed, complex cost ridiculous amounts of pg & cpu. Even without a buff to hp on the extenders, this will be so handy for fitting regulators and rechargers.
Im open to suggestions and criticism.
These are an initial idea of numbers and are there to be discussed.
But I must stress again in the chance a DEV sees this.
DO NOT NERF ARMOUR IF YOU DECIDE TO BUFF SHIELDS!!!! This noob^ lawl If I see you in game prepare to die many many times.
Oh yay, my first stalker!
Cant wait to see you baby
What server/gamemode you on? |
|
|
| |
|