|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Summa Militum
Art.of.Death
525
|
Posted - 2015.07.18 15:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Deadly Goliath wrote:First off I have a few things to say before I continue, Apocalyptic Destroyer, just cause you don't have anything proper to say you just decide to hate on other peoples posts, man rethink what you say you hateful ____. Another point, all of you racist ______ that hate on Nyain Chan, man eat a fat ____. I ain't Asian but you guys are proper racist, so maybe you should shut your mouths for once, there ain't nothing wrong with being Asian.
I didn't know people in this game were racist against Asians. Where exactly do you see this racism at? |
Summa Militum
Art.of.Death Smart Deploy
668
|
Posted - 2015.08.30 00:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote:I have seen every page of this thread and it's a joke , all you guys are bromancing all day and for what ?
Who's the best in action movies .?. Bruce Lee or the Expendables .?. Bruce Lee could handle 20 guys by himself and The Expendable's are 20 guys .
It's just not the same , everyone that any of you have mentioned , played in a well known corporation and had help , that's not to say that they wasn't great but who dominates the leaderboards .?. players who are in corps , now that doesn't mean that they are the best , it just means that they were advantageous from the help that they received .
I can run in a squad and bring down someone to the end of their existence only to see someone else come and get the kill and I get the assist , now that's teamwork and I'm all for that but that's not a one on one experience and if you have a coordinated team , you won't find yourself in many one on one's to begin with .
It's like asking who's the best heavy in-game , the one with two or three logistic players repairing them or the one that can kill 4 players alone without any reps being applied ? I mean , how hard is it to be successful when you have others around you functioning like a cohesive unit ?
I could never understand discussions like this because you really can't be honest in your opinions .
To me the best players are the one's who play solo and know what to do and be just as functional as those who play in a squad but solo players get zero respect from the community , hell some want to rid the game of the existence of solo players ... I've seen some of the comments from past threads , where you want to force players into squads .
It's a joke .
How can you be considered so " great " , when you have others helping you and I'm not against help , not at all but a lot of you are hypocritical , I use to see people talking crap about Duna 2002 ( Or however it was spelled , sorry .. no offence ) all day , talking about how scrubby he was and how his tank crew use to help him acquire the kills he received but in the same breath your asking this question and these people that are mentioned are being praised as the best of the best , didn't they receive help as well or did they do this on their own .?. most of you ran in squads with those whom your mentioning so the answer is they had to receive help .
Kills mean nothing because someone else can do all the work and you deliver the finishing blow and get the recorded kill , WP's mean nothing , anyone could stay glued to a heavy with a repairer after laying links and hives and if your in a squad , it's much easier to do these things then it is when your solo .
For this game to be a team based game there is so much squad bias in the forums , it's just sickening at times .
I just couldn't take it anymore reading such dreck , now you can go back to your bromance and enjoy yourselves .
A lot of you would be garbage if you didn't have your squad running with you and hell , some of you don't even play unless you have squad mates on .
I don't hate on squads , I just don't like how their made to be more important then the TEAM or a solo player for that matter .
Bruce Lee was the best , he was the squad and the team all in one and had humility as well .
Truth!! |
Summa Militum
Art.of.Death Smart Deploy
674
|
Posted - 2015.08.30 06:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:I wrote out a long response...but people have covered it here for the most part.
This thread is illogical. But if you want a tangent thought I had while writing out my initial thoughts:
with all certainty...there has been a dearth of players good enough skill wise that possessed enough leadership to create corps that could compete with the 'elite' few that have been here for years now.
Imps TeamPlayers AE NS FA OH
These are the short list of the corps that have been number one in the game at any given point in history. Maybe i'm missing one, it's 2 am.
If the new 'christmas noobs' are better...where are the leaders of this influx and their respective corps challenging the legacies of those who have been waiting for a new opponent to shift the entrenched politics of this game's only competitive game mode since time immemorial?
Don't tell me that challenging the existing powers can't be done with a new corp of mostly inexperienced players.
I can tell you with surety that it can be done.
If people are so sure that 'christmas noobs' or w/e other euphemism people have for those who came after the OG vets are better...please demonstrate it by rounding up those people and forming a corporation that can compete for elite status in Planetary Conquest.
P.S.
As an OG vet...the breadth and depth of the long forgotten players who beasted this game from Blamejudges KEQ to Djinn Hellsreaper to Baracka to Spongly to Deranged to CSR Sample to The Black Art to Konohomaru to Protoman to Fizzycandy to Traky to Exmaple to Roner...the twins...Zitro's...and ultimately James5955...There's simply no doubt in my mind that this game has..in the aggregate...lost more talent than it's gained.
For EVERY great player that would now be considered among the top in the game and arrived after...1.8 or Rouge Wedding...I could name 10 others from memory who were just as good...having played against most of them over 2 years ago.
Name me 25 players who arrived around 1.8 and would be consensus beasts...and I'll name you 10 OG vets for each name that would get the nod of superiority in a comparison from those who know/knew them both.
Pilots...Logibro's...Slayers...you name it.
You're kind of coming off as an arrogant little ****. |
Summa Militum
Art.of.Death Smart Deploy
677
|
Posted - 2015.08.30 17:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:Summa Militum wrote:
You're kind of coming off as an arrogant little ****.
Quite an achievement I think considering the conundrum that I'm paying tribute to other players and not myself.
You are not paying tribute to other players; you are using the names of other players to try to prove your statements true. The legist of what you said comes down more to you talking **** about not just the current player base but also the current great players of the game than it does a comparison between great players from the past and great players of today. I call you arrogant because you seem to be so proud that you became a part of this game before a lot of the current players that you can not even recognize the skill of some of the people today. |
Summa Militum
Abstract Requiem
1
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 03:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Most of you people suck at this game and rely too heavily on a squad to help you succeed. |
Summa Militum
Abstract Requiem
1
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 05:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:Summa Militum wrote:Most of you people suck at this game and rely too heavily on a squad to help you succeed. What a brilliant statement to say about a tactical shooter. You suck because you work together better then people with individual talent. The top corps in this game used to demand there players squad together, because it doesn't matter how good you are if you can't follow orders, know where to be, or support your team. A good example of this is a well known legend, Alldin. A Imperfect with undeniable skill with anything he touches. Problem is, he's not the best team player. Same issue with Kaizuka Sniper and many other 'top' players. The only class that has ever gotten away with Solo play are vehicles. Infantry who believe they can solo anything are the reason teams lose. Individual talent gets you noticed, but teamwork gets you fielded.
I understand what you are saying.
I feel though that too many people in this game don't know how to effectively analyze what is happening in a match and don't know how to make adjustments accordingly. I don't really know why so many people struggle with this but I have a feeling it has to do with so many people only focusing on what's going on with their particular squad instead of what is going on with the entire team.
|
Summa Militum
Abstract Requiem
1
|
Posted - 2015.11.22 07:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: No, he doesn't. I've played against him. Yes, he is good, but you're wildly exaggerating.
Besides, I don't think he plays anymore.
I consider you to be someone who holds legendary status in this game. I have seen no other person who can do what you can do in that MinScout. |
Summa Militum
Abstract Requiem
1
|
Posted - 2015.11.27 04:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kid Chilled wrote:Summa Militum wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: No, he doesn't. I've played against him. Yes, he is good, but you're wildly exaggerating.
Besides, I don't think he plays anymore.
I consider you to be someone who holds legendary status in this game. I have seen no other person who can do what you can do in that MinScout. I do hope that was sarcasm. I have seen Dreis in a minscout, he is good, but he is not musturd good. Dreis is nowhere near legendary status. Get that **** out of here bro, don't be jockin where it doesn't belong.
Who the **** are you and why don't you realize how pathetic you are that you can't let go of the past?
People like you are so desperate to be a part of something greater than yourself that you grab ahold of elite players from the past and somehow try to use them to prop yourself up above the people who kick your ass in the game today.
|
|
|
|