DUST Search - SSD vs PS3 ultra slim 12GB inbuild flash storage

All Channels

General Discussions

SSD vs PS3 ultra slim 12GB inbuild flash storage

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Bright Cloud Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.07.17 15:11:00 - [1] - Quote Im gonna see if i can squeeze out more performance on dust by switching my PS3's operating system from my trusty SSD to the inbuild 12GB flash storage. Gonna be interesting cause maybe the 12GB inbuild flash storage will perform better with Dust then a SSD due to the rather slow connection between the SSD and the Sata interface that cannot be changed. If you are now scratching your head and want to do this aswell you will need a super slim PS3. A Fat or old slim PS3 variant doesnt support this feature. Rudimentary Mercs of scrubs and incompetence. You touch my mind, fumbling in Ignorance, incapable of understanding.
Bright Cloud Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.07.17 15:19:00 - [2] - Quote Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: Bright Cloud wrote: Im gonna see if i can squeeze out more performance on dust by switching my PS3's operating system from my trusty SSD to the inbuild 12GB flash storage. Gonna be interesting cause maybe the 12GB inbuild flash storage will perform better with Dust then a SSD due to the rather slow connection between the SSD and the Sata interface that cannot be changed. If you are now scratching your head and want to do this aswell you will need a super slim PS3. A Fat or old slim PS3 variant doesnt support this feature. you are better off getting a SSHD more storage space and the same performance of a SSD You misunderstand i have a ultra slim with a SSD (the 12GB flash storage is inbuild and cannot be taken out). Im just gonna go ahead and do the epxeriment on performance by switching the internal storage via recovery menu. Currently redownloading Dust, then ill update and see if i have a better perfomance compared to a regular SSD. Rudimentary Mercs of scrubs and incompetence. You touch my mind, fumbling in Ignorance, incapable of understanding.
Bright Cloud Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.07.17 17:44:00 - [3] - Quote Test result: the internal 12GB flash storage is slower then a regular SSD. Longer loading times, worse performance etc. Just dont bother with it if you allready got a SSD. Rudimentary Mercs of scrubs and incompetence. You touch my mind, fumbling in Ignorance, incapable of understanding.
Bright Cloud Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.07.18 02:02:00 - [4] - Quote Heimdallr69 wrote: I actually ordered an ssd from Amazon, will probably get it next week..yes I know absolutely nothing about them other than what I've watched on youtube I have the ultra slim as well a SSD is basically a bigger USB stick. Rudimentary Mercs of scrubs and incompetence. You touch my mind, fumbling in Ignorance, incapable of understanding.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.