|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
IAmDuncanIdaho II
Nos Nothi
2
   |
Posted - 2015.07.16 12:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Very very surprised candidates do not have a link to their "platform", "manifesto" or whatever it is we call it in their signature. Only see one on Operative's.
You guys really should consider adding the link. Make it as easy as possible for potential voters to read your stuff. |
IAmDuncanIdaho II
Nos Nothi
3
|
Posted - 2015.07.18 07:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:TheD1CK wrote:Fox Gaden wrote:My voting list so far: Pokey DravonCross Atu Zaria Min Deir BreakinGÇÖ Stuff Kevall will probably be on there somewhere. I voted for him last time. I donGÇÖt know Talos, so will have to look out for some of his posts. Of course I am not sure who is all running yet. Yes there is still uncertainty about who will run, but the ones working hardest for it are noticable. I updated OP to set Pokey as a solid candidate, I think most of Dust will be hoping he can be the critic that can beat some sense into CCP  A lot of mercs thinking about CPM voting will browse this so feedback from candidates is very welcome I like to think that Rattati and I both react well to a very analytical approach on topics. He's always been very responsive to my discussions with him because I approach things in a very factual manner. So when he comes up with an idea that just doesn't make sense, and I explain to him why it doesn't make sense, he's been very willing to change his position on the topic. What he doesn't respond to well is emotionally driven rants and demands, which is something I always try to avoid in my conversations.
:: seeding a thought ::
He does need to look at more than just the numbers though...and maybe he does, but that's not my perception. This is why having more heads involved is always a good idea to get all angles. Anecdotal and observational evidence has its place. |
IAmDuncanIdaho II
Nos Nothi
3
|
Posted - 2015.07.18 12:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:IAmDuncanIdaho II wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:
I like to think that Rattati and I both react well to a very analytical approach on topics. He's always been very responsive to my discussions with him because I approach things in a very factual manner. So when he comes up with an idea that just doesn't make sense, and I explain to him why it doesn't make sense, he's been very willing to change his position on the topic.
What he doesn't respond to well is emotionally driven rants and demands, which is something I always try to avoid in my conversations.
:: seeding a thought :: I feel he can focus too much on numbers though...maybe he does look at other stuff too, but I think too much weight is placed on numbers. This is why having more heads involved is always a good idea to get all angles. Anecdotal and observational evidence has its place as does realising that balance is not necessarily achieved with perfect symmetry It's important to remember that CCP Rattati is an Engineer, so he's -going- to focus on the numbers first. 
Exactly why I mentioned it - because putting like-minded alongside him (as in Pokey's example) misses the other aspects, as you and others have already pointed out in later posts re: how stuff *feels*.
Instead of (or indeed as well as!) breaking down into small groups of like-minded and having isolated discussions, then rejoining to disagree with equivalent other groups, inclusive discussion involving all the types involved should achieve better results.
|
|
|
| |
|