|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
11
   |
Posted - 2015.07.13 15:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
Scrambler isn't OP, just VERY powerful in 1v1 or 1v2 situations. You have amazing burst damage, but lack the drawn out DPS of the other rifles.
I'm still convinced that the best 1v1 suit in the game is the Amarr Assault with a scrambler. I don't see how you should lose a 1v1 in that suit, with your amazing burst and tankiness. Granted, you're really slow and have no decent regen, so its not made to weather an assault without support, unlike the Gallente or Caldari.
Currently listening to: Tsukihime OST
Un-Retired PC Scout. I miss the old days ;_;
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
11
|
Posted - 2015.07.13 16:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vitharr Foebane wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:http://dust.thang.dk/market_historycategory.php
Judging by this, the scrambler rifle is falling behind. Still and as always the least used fine rifle
Cause Skill-Cap.
Using the scrambler effectively heavily relies on being able to know when to use the weapon in certain ways.
Messing up a charge shot into engagement, or not spacing shots correctly at range can be a death sentence. This deters most users from it.
I for one, hate the Scrambler. Mainly cause Amarr. I'm a well known Matari loyalist. On a separate issue, I dislike how unreliable it can be in CQC. It's heavily dependent on charge into engagement in CQC. Otherwise, all you can do is spam and hope.
Hence why I use my ACR and CR more. Reliable and versatile, just the way I like it.
Currently listening to: Tsukihime OST
Un-Retired PC Scout. I miss the old days ;_;
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
11
|
Posted - 2015.07.13 18:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Stormblade Green wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:http://dust.thang.dk/market_historycategory.php
Judging by this, the scrambler rifle is falling behind. Heh.... kinda doesn' t prove a thing.... this is just economics. It could mean tons of people Don't use it. It could also mean it is rarely lost in battles..... Plus using this logic wouldn't that mean the rr is op? Or is that the ar with tons of buys? Looking at the killfeed doesn't prove a thing either. My point here is that correlation does not, and never will, equal causation.
But it is a healthy indicator that something might be up.
OP is still wrong. Just noting that. I just see that quote thrown all over the place. It isn't wrong, but you should never ignore correlation. You investigate it.
Currently listening to: Tsukihime OST
Un-Retired PC Scout. I miss the old days ;_;
|
Ghost Kaisar
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
11
|
Posted - 2015.07.13 18:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Ghost Kaisar wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Stormblade Green wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:http://dust.thang.dk/market_historycategory.php
Judging by this, the scrambler rifle is falling behind. Heh.... kinda doesn' t prove a thing.... this is just economics. It could mean tons of people Don't use it. It could also mean it is rarely lost in battles..... Plus using this logic wouldn't that mean the rr is op? Or is that the ar with tons of buys? Looking at the killfeed doesn't prove a thing either. My point here is that correlation does not, and never will, equal causation. But it is a healthy indicator that something might be up. OP is still wrong. Just noting that. I just see that quote thrown all over the place. It isn't wrong, but you should never ignore correlation. You investigate it. I'm not even considering it a healthy indicator when the Kill Feed and the Dust.Thang.DK have highly conflicting reports.
I wasn't referring specifically to that situation. I'm not addressing the kill feed and Dust Thang, just the saying.
In general: Correlation should have you investigating. You don't assume causation. But you look into the possibility if its plausible. Big emphasis on plausible.
Currently listening to: Tsukihime OST
Un-Retired PC Scout. I miss the old days ;_;
|
|
|
| |
|