| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1
   |
Posted - 2015.07.11 04:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
being inside its radius lowers you scan profile to 1 dB
radius increases at adv and proto levels.
useful? |
five times
Liverpool F.C.
166
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 03:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yeah, as a heavy I would love this |
Terry Webber
Molon Labe.
RUST415
801
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 03:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
I think it would be best for the device to reduce profiles by a percentage than to reduce everything to 1 decibel.
Inertial Booster Module
Vehicle Installation
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 05:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
Terry Webber wrote:I think it would be best for the device to reduce profiles by a percentage than to reduce everything to 1 decibel.
well if gal logi scans werent so crazy, then yes. but since they see everything we need some form of counter.
pros: you can finally hide from gal scans and make little camping spots to hide in.
cons: the device is stationary. |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 05:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
five times wrote:Yeah, as a heavy I would love this
hell yea. a lot of people would. most campers though lol |
Terry Webber
Molon Labe.
RUST415
804
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 05:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Terry Webber wrote:I think it would be best for the device to reduce profiles by a percentage than to reduce everything to 1 decibel. well if gal logi scans werent so crazy, then yes. but since they see everything we need some form of counter. pros: you can finally hide from gal scans and make little camping spots to hide in. cons: the device is stationary. They could be very large percentages, maybe 80% or more.
Inertial Booster Module
Vehicle Installation
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 07:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
Terry Webber wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:Terry Webber wrote:I think it would be best for the device to reduce profiles by a percentage than to reduce everything to 1 decibel. well if gal logi scans werent so crazy, then yes. but since they see everything we need some form of counter. pros: you can finally hide from gal scans and make little camping spots to hide in. cons: the device is stationary. They could be very large percentages, maybe 80% or more.
the problem with percentages is that they would stack. and the way stacking penalties work is weird. if you put too many in one spot you could actually end up increasing you profile.
it be much easier to just have them rduce the profile to an absolute value |
Terry Webber
Molon Labe.
RUST415
806
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 19:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Terry Webber wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:Terry Webber wrote:I think it would be best for the device to reduce profiles by a percentage than to reduce everything to 1 decibel. well if gal logi scans werent so crazy, then yes. but since they see everything we need some form of counter. pros: you can finally hide from gal scans and make little camping spots to hide in. cons: the device is stationary. They could be very large percentages, maybe 80% or more. the problem with percentages is that they would stack. and the way stacking penalties work is weird. if you put too many in one spot you could actually end up increasing you profile. it be much easier to just have them rduce the profile to an absolute value Overlapping profile dampening nanohives would actually increase profiles instead of reduce them? Is that how the profile dampening modules work? If so, then that could be one of the disadvantages of the device.
Inertial Booster Module
Vehicle Installation
|
Hector Carson
G0DS AM0NG MEN
New Eden's Heros
205
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 19:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
I actually like this, but instead of 1 db lets go with what that guy said needs to be a real percentage, other than that I am on board with that idea
Dampening Nanohive:
Basic: 15% CPU: 25 PG: 10
Adv.: 25% CPU: 40 PG: 15
Proto: 40% CPU: 65 PG: 15
Optimization Fitting Skill per lvl: 2% reduction for Dampening Nanohives CPU cost
Let me know what you think
Commando gk.0
Sentinel gk.0
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 20:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
Terry Webber wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:Terry Webber wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:Terry Webber wrote:I think it would be best for the device to reduce profiles by a percentage than to reduce everything to 1 decibel. well if gal logi scans werent so crazy, then yes. but since they see everything we need some form of counter. pros: you can finally hide from gal scans and make little camping spots to hide in. cons: the device is stationary. They could be very large percentages, maybe 80% or more. the problem with percentages is that they would stack. and the way stacking penalties work is weird. if you put too many in one spot you could actually end up increasing you profile. it be much easier to just have them rduce the profile to an absolute value Overlapping profile dampening nanohives would actually increase profiles instead of reduce them? Is that how the profile dampening modules work? If so, then that could be one of the disadvantages of the device.
it depends on if a module carries stacking penalties. usually penalties can only be given to bonuses that are percentage based.
if the device doesnt have stacking penalties, then there's no worries |
|
|
DeathwindRising
ROGUE RELICS
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 20:26:00 -
[11] - Quote
Hector Carson wrote:I actually like this, but instead of 1 db lets go with what that guy said needs to be a real percentage, other than that I am on board with that idea
Dampening Nanohive:
Basic: 15% CPU: 25 PG: 10
Adv.: 25% CPU: 40 PG: 15
Proto: 40% CPU: 65 PG: 15
Optimization Fitting Skill per lvl: 2% reduction for Dampening Nanohives CPU cost
Let me know what you think
maybe 20%, then 30% and 40%.
too much of a gap otherwise.
i like it. how many can be carried though? 6 like the other nanohives?
does the radius increase at adv and proto, or should that be a variant? |
Terry Webber
Molon Labe.
RUST415
806
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 20:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Hector Carson wrote:I actually like this, but instead of 1 db lets go with what that guy said needs to be a real percentage, other than that I am on board with that idea
Dampening Nanohive:
Basic: 15% CPU: 25 PG: 10
Adv.: 25% CPU: 40 PG: 15
Proto: 40% CPU: 65 PG: 15
Optimization Fitting Skill per lvl: 2% reduction for Dampening Nanohives CPU cost
Let me know what you think This looks like a good start but what about the radius of each them?
Inertial Booster Module
Vehicle Installation
|
Hector Carson
G0DS AM0NG MEN
New Eden's Heros
206
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 21:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
Terry Webber wrote:Hector Carson wrote:I actually like this, but instead of 1 db lets go with what that guy said needs to be a real percentage, other than that I am on board with that idea
Dampening Nanohive:
Basic: 15% CPU: 25 PG: 10
Adv.: 25% CPU: 40 PG: 15
Proto: 40% CPU: 65 PG: 15
Optimization Fitting Skill per lvl: 2% reduction for Dampening Nanohives CPU cost
Let me know what you think This looks like a good start but what about the radius of each them?
Standard 7 meter radius
Commando gk.0
Sentinel gk.0
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |