|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
55
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 21:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
Didn't realise they'd turned on full player trading yet. |
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
55
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 22:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
IR Scifi wrote:Vlad Rostok wrote:Those aren't scams. It's outright theft. Problem is many of the r-tards in "New Eden" don't know a "scam" from "theft". Do you suppose we should be grateful they aren't out stealing purses from old ladies? Because it's sort of the same behaviour. Evidence of the same character flaw. Did they somehow hack into your account and trade them away when you weren't looking? No? You say you willing selected GIVE item and didn't get what was expected in return? Sorry friend that's not theft. It seriously sucks I agree and CCP should get us a proper trading system asap but let's not go crazy pretending this is something it's not. Next you'll try convincing me that piracy is something other than stealing **** on the high seas.
I think you should consider looking up the word theft, because I don't think it means what you think it means. If an agreement to trade was made and they didn't fulfill their end of the trade then that's theft. It's pretty much a textbook definition of theft. If you walk into a shop and agree to pay money for an item, they hand you a bag with the stuff and ask for your money, what do you think would happen if you just walked out of the shop as you'd been handed the item? I'll put money on it you'd be arrested and charged for theft.
I do agree with you on not pretending that it's something it's not, but you're trying to pretend it wasn't theft when by any definition it was. |
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
55
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 23:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:Vlad Rostok wrote:IR Scifi wrote:Vlad Rostok wrote:Those aren't scams. It's outright theft. Problem is many of the r-tards in "New Eden" don't know a "scam" from "theft". Do you suppose we should be grateful they aren't out stealing purses from old ladies? Because it's sort of the same behaviour. Evidence of the same character flaw. Did they somehow hack into your account and trade them away when you weren't looking? No? You say you willing selected GIVE item and didn't get what was expected in return? Sorry friend that's not theft. It seriously sucks I agree and CCP should get us a proper trading system asap but let's not go crazy pretending this is something it's not. Next you'll try convincing me that piracy is something other than stealing **** on the high seas. I wouldn't deal with anyone I didn't personally know, especially in the realm of "New Eden" where being a "scammer" is some sort of f*cked up badge of honour. If I offered up something for sale IRL and the buyer didn't pay up upon goods receipt or their cheque bounced, then g*ddamn right it's theft. And deserving of retribution. thats actually fraud not theft aka scamming
No, it's theft. Fraud is a specific form of theft. Scamming is also theft, but in Eve it's specifically allowed, I've not seen such an exemption in any of the Dust Terms of Use allowing it though. |
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
55
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 23:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:Vlad Rostok wrote:IR Scifi wrote:Vlad Rostok wrote:Those aren't scams. It's outright theft. Problem is many of the r-tards in "New Eden" don't know a "scam" from "theft". Do you suppose we should be grateful they aren't out stealing purses from old ladies? Because it's sort of the same behaviour. Evidence of the same character flaw. Did they somehow hack into your account and trade them away when you weren't looking? No? You say you willing selected GIVE item and didn't get what was expected in return? Sorry friend that's not theft. It seriously sucks I agree and CCP should get us a proper trading system asap but let's not go crazy pretending this is something it's not. Next you'll try convincing me that piracy is something other than stealing **** on the high seas. I wouldn't deal with anyone I didn't personally know, especially in the realm of "New Eden" where being a "scammer" is some sort of f*cked up badge of honour. If I offered up something for sale IRL and the buyer didn't pay up upon goods receipt or their cheque bounced, then g*ddamn right it's theft. And deserving of retribution. thats actually fraud not theft from a legal standpoint. fraud is a violation of a lgeal contract or agreement. any sales could as a legal agreement. theft however is the change of property without consent or legal agreement. akafraud = scamming it is YOU who do not understand the difference between froud and theft good sir
No, it is you who don't understand the difference. Fraud is using any deliberate deception to achieve unfair/unlawful gain. Which is strangely almost the exact same definition as theft. Fraud is just applied to specific crimes where an individual victim is harder to identify.
Of course the confusion arises in that fraud can also be used to gain items without a specific value or nebulous legal benefits to which they are not entitled. For example obtaining a driving license or passport not in your name is also considered fraud. However, in this case, goods were taken without payment. The method is irrelevant, it's theft. Though the two are very closely related. |
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
55
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 23:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
Krias Thracian wrote: No, it's theft. Fraud is a specific form of theft. Scamming is also theft, but in Eve it's specifically allowed, I've not seen such an exemption in any of the Dust Terms of Use allowing it though.
Ghosts Chance wrote:i dont see a specific exemption alowinng people to leave their mics oipen with screaming children in the room either but aparently thats alowed....
you show a very clearn misunderstanding of how things work so im done here
scamming isnt a legal term... scam is the commons of fraud... they are one in the same. fraud and theft are two very different legal definitions.
Congratulations on using reductio ad absurdem like a child because they've been proven wrong. Specific exemptions for that is entirely unnecessary. It's discourteous, not illegal or even morally wrong. Your suggestion implies that they should have a specific exemption for everything that irritates you?
Theft is wrong, and moreover in any other game of its type is not tolerated and so a specific exemption is granted in EvE specifying that it is allowed and so to guard against it.
The misunderstanding is not mine, but yours for thinking that theft is allowed and normal behaviour and should be placed on the same level of behaviour as an open microphone. One hopes you're just trolling.
No, fraud and theft are almost the same legal definition. Fraud IS theft, or more importantly, a specific form of theft. |
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
57
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 23:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ghosts Chance wrote:Krias Thracian wrote:Krias Thracian wrote: No, it's theft. Fraud is a specific form of theft. Scamming is also theft, but in Eve it's specifically allowed, I've not seen such an exemption in any of the Dust Terms of Use allowing it though.
i dont see a specific exemption alowinng people to leave their mics oipen with screaming children in the room either but aparently thats alowed.... you show a very clearn misunderstanding of how things work so im done here scamming isnt a legal term... scam is the commons of fraud... they are one in the same. fraud and theft are two very different legal definitions. Congratulations on using reductio ad absurdem like a child because they've been proven wrong. Specific exemptions for that is entirely unnecessary. It's discourteous, not illegal or even morally wrong. Your suggestion implies that they should have a specific exemption for everything that irritates you? Theft is wrong, and moreover in any other game of its type is not tolerated and so a specific exemption is granted in EvE specifying that it is allowed and so to guard against it. The misunderstanding is not mine, but yours for thinking that theft is allowed and normal behaviour and should be placed on the same level of behaviour as an open microphone. One hopes you're just trolling. No, fraud and theft are almost the same legal definition. Fraud IS theft, or more importantly, a specific form of theft.
Ghosts Chance wrote:*slow clap* congratulations for reading a "forumwarrior" 101 manual aka debate theory
but its actually a relevent example
leaving an open mic on with screaming children in the room while your not activly using said mic is ALSO wrong. but in this instance right and wrong are defined prurely be legal and illegal, and in the world we live in things are legal untill they are expressly deemed illegal though judicial review. (case law being what tends to define these judgements)
so not only did you pull out debate theory 101 you used it incorrectly.
No, it's not wrong at all. It is likely negligence, or they're busy, your implication is that they are deliberately doing it to irritate you, which would be wrong. Without intent there is no moral argument to be made so the action is negligent, not morally wrong in any way and therefore completely irrelevant and no place in this discussion. As I said, you are comparing an act of negligence with an act that is illegal. That the act takes place in an online setting doesn't change that.
Theft IS illegal. It is defined as such and you have no clue how legality is actually defined. The Judiciary do not define legality. They enforce the law (and in America have the unique power to strike down laws incompatible with the Constitution). The law is defined by the legislative branches of government, who also set the punishment for said laws.
As I said, Theft is illegal. Fraud is also a form of theft and also illegal. As they are both illegal, within the framework of the game there is a specific exemption for EvE that allows it.
I refuse to lower myself to the act of going and actually finding legislation wording for them because you clearly have no actual idea how the law is formed or works. |
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
59
|
Posted - 2015.07.11 09:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jack the Rlpper wrote:Between yesterday and today Ive lost 15mil isk and 2 skins. 15 Mil to Ali lol99 and 2 skins to a David L33 who is working wth whiteguy pasty white.
I'd suggest you raise a ticket, there's nothing in the Terms of Service or Rules of Conduct to allow it and if the trade mechanic is broken and is how this was done, then they may return your stuff.
|
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
59
|
Posted - 2015.07.11 12:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Count- -Crotchula wrote:For the person who mistakenly sees this as theft and not fraud (and for the person who has exhausted all options save copy and pasting legal framework). The words "fraud by misrepresentation" came to mind, so I googled it to make sure.
"Fraud by Misrepresentation (or fraudulent misrepresentation) under Section 2 Fraud Act 2006
Section 2 Fraud Act 2006 sets out the framework of the classic fraud offence. The offence usually consists of some sort of dishonest statement made to gain something or so that someone else makes a loss. This offence is one that will often apply to an offence committed in business. The four necessary elements that must be proved in order to result in a conviction are:
A representation must be made The representation must be known to be false The representation must be dishonestly made The person making the representation must intend to gain something, or intend that the person receiving it loses something"
Perhaps we should have an insterstellar court of justice?
Once again, Theft is obtaining something that is not yours with the intent to deprive an individual of it. You gaining or someone making a loss does not necessarily imply that you took their items, which is why fraud can be different. But as you seem to want to be a moron about it, here is the legal definition of theft:
A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it; and GÇ£thiefGÇ¥ and GÇ£stealGÇ¥ shall be construed accordingly.
(2)It is immaterial whether the appropriation is made with a view to gain, or is made for the thiefGÇÖs own benefit.
(3)The five following sections of this Act shall have effect as regards the interpretation and operation of this section (and, except as otherwise provided by this Act, shall apply only for purposes of this section). Annotations: Help about Annotation
Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C3S. 1(1) applied (25.8.2000) by 2000 c. 6, ss. 148(8), 168 2GÇ£DishonestlyGÇ¥
(1)A personGÇÖs appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonestGÇö
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the otherGÇÖs consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A personGÇÖs appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
See the rather significant bit about Dishonestly Appropriates Property that does not belong to them? That's EXACTLY what scamming items off of someone is. You've been dishonest and taken goods that aren't yours. The canadian version of the law even SPECIFIES that it can be done fraudulently. Would you like to continue to defend your idiotically doomed position?
|
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
62
|
Posted - 2015.07.14 20:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
This is particularly relevant to this: http://www.buzzfeed.com/jonstone/make-love-not-warcraft#.xqy4xwveny
God I hope that's a joke, as it could have rather frightening implications for EvE in particular, but many other online games.... |
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
62
|
Posted - 2015.07.14 20:53:00 -
[10] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Krias Thracian wrote:This is particularly relevant to this: http://www.buzzfeed.com/jonstone/make-love-not-warcraft#.xqy4xwvenyGod I hope that's a joke, as it could have rather frightening implications for EvE in particular, but many other online games.... Of course, if something like this does end up happening, be it in 2 years, 5 years or 10 years then EvE, or whatever takes its place if it's not around any more will probably cry as their customer base of loyal sociopaths evaporates when the first court case comes through. Could be pretty funny..... Not going to happen. First off, Eve Online is played globally. How will you even convince the country to even charge the player if the developers were the ones that allowed it in the first place? Do you have any idea how many players in Eve steal and scam? You can safely assume almost all of them barring the new players. And even the new players will eventually turn to the dark side of Eve. You will have to practically arrest everyone who plays Eve Online because everything in Eve is tied somehow to real-world cash via the PLEX system.
That's why it would be funny. :) Though to answer your question, the same way Microsoft and Google and Apple keep getting screwed by the EU for unfair business practices/lack of ethics. You operate globally, you have to abide by the laws of the country you're operating it. Don't get me wrong, it would only apply to people from the specific country, I can't see anyone but the US trying for extradition over something like that, but that would just make it funnier.
Like I said, it would be hysterical.
Though I have been playing EvE for over 6 years and I have yet to scam anyone. Ganked a few times. Never scammed. |
|
Krias Thracian
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
64
|
Posted - 2015.07.15 13:56:00 -
[11] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Soldner VonKuechle wrote:This thread makes my day, as i have recently settled a fraudulent claims/failure to produce suit involving my farm and the feed mill i used to buy from.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
Fraud at times can be theft, and fraud at times, will not be theft.
As well as theft at times can have fraudulent roots, where as other times is just straight boosting something.
If you have to argue for days about it, i suggest you go to law school.
And finally,
LOLOLOLOLOL. Law school doesn't teach you jack **** about what happens when you become a victim of scamming and theft in a game that allows it because the devs allow it. We are talking about outliers here. Or as I call it, the grey areas of the video game industry. Is it really punishable in the real world when you commit a crime in a game that clearly allows it like Eve Online? If I were to scam you right now or rob your player corporation's ISK and assets in Eve, will that mean you can file charges against me in the real world court? Unlike actual real-world farms like you mentioned, laws are not clearly defined when it comes to in-game shenanigans like you see here in Dust or Eve. Even if the law becomes updated later on to make them clearly defined, would the law accommodate for developers who actually allow such shenanigans in their games?
Indeed, though there are precedents of course. EvE and Dust both have very specific rules in their TOC against Online Bullying and Racism and all the -isms, undoubtedly partly because they are illegal in almost every country where CCP Operates.
It would be a rather dangerous precedent if "Virtual Theft" were given the same legal weight as "Real Theft" and CCP would have the choice to either stop operating in countries that implemented such a law, or comply with said law. Like I said, it would be funny as hell. |
|
|
|