we can track all players that used the claim function and track all trades of that item from that person to the next, and so on. Those that think they can outsmart by sending to more and more alts to hide their tracks are mistaken.

So just as a hypothetical 1trade = notbad.... 17 trades = verybad?

I know quite a few who decided to give some to their friends either as a trial run knowing that they'd be removed or simply just not knowing any better.

On the upside having the opportunity to use them has confirmed some peoples desires to buy one.

If you're smart enough to know it's valuable, you're probably smart enough to realize it was unintentional. There's really not much point to playing stupid here.

Yet I have not ever used a faction warfare booster especially with the intent of exploiting something unintended (to my recollection, I may have popped some during the various fw events), I don't condone it myself, and I've never encourage others to exploit it!

I myself didn't ever hear about it until two days ago and I had assumed that someone had already filed a ticket about it, so you're not really turn the tables on me like you think you are dozer.

You calling me a liar? Can you prove it? Have any compelling evidence of me going "run fw boosters! they're glitched!", have any evidence of me doing it myself? If not, **** off.

I know about the apex serpentis scout exploit too, does that mean I condone exploiting it dozer? That's the exact leap of logic you're making.

In any case, I find it amusing that you of all people (with your incredible amounts of isk and what 1500+ kubo cannons) are butthurt over being 'impaired' in your ability to do something... especially when that something is take advantage of an exploit or be punished for participating in said exploit.

And somehow I'm not according to you? I said glitched boosters are bad, I said I don't condone it. How do you get the opposite message out of that?

I don't need to disprove it, because of a simple little thing called the burden of proof... a person asserting a position (eg. you claiming that I have benefited from the glitched booster) bears the weight of proving it. It's far easier to create fallacious statements than it is to disprove them, which is why 'fallacious' statements must be made not fallacious before they're worth being considered.

And maybe contrary to popular belief, I don't jam my opinions down peoples throats at every opportunity. When comes to how STF operates I speak my opinion because it is my responsibility to, when it comes to people spreading misinformation I speak up because it should be everyone's job to counter misinformation and ignorance. But about plenty of other more private issues, I don't speak up because either no one cares what I think of say the BDSM community or they're not interested in listening to my opinion on say pc vs console (or a more pertinent example, the exploitation of something that isn't working properly but is unlikely to have any actual consequences).


By your logic I can confidently assert that you are pedophile, and while I cannot prove that you are.... you cannot prove that you aren't. allegedy.

This is as absurd and slanderous as your example, that's why we don't deal with these statements. While we'd both like to be right about things, My position is actually correct, yours is not.