|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
korrah silain
True Illuminate
68
   |
Posted - 2015.06.25 21:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
I disagree with the diwnvoting aspect because it will allow anyone who dislikes the tactics you use to down vote, eg: ******* scouts! Rage down vote, damb prohards! Downvote. HES USING A SCANNER!?/SWARM LAUNCHER!? downvote. HOW DARE SOMEONE SNIPE ME!? downvote. My concern isn't intentional abuse, just butthurt sore losers.
And this is a concern as anyone who drives a vehicle hates anyone with a swarm for example, and I personally think anyone in superhard Maddie's needs a downvote, so it inherently punishes 'unpopular' play styles. |
korrah silain
True Illuminate
69
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 21:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Talos Vagheitan wrote:korrah silain wrote:I disagree with the diwnvoting aspect because it will allow anyone who dislikes the tactics you use to down vote, eg: ******* scouts! Rage down vote, damb prohards! Downvote. HES USING A SCANNER!?/SWARM LAUNCHER!? downvote. HOW DARE SOMEONE SNIPE ME!? downvote. My concern isn't intentional abuse, just butthurt sore losers. I'll encourage you to re-read the OP. I've throughly covered the problem of potential abuse
No you didn't. One down vote for every butt hurt piolet, or infantry who can't scratch your Maddie or person who hates redline snipers or person who can't stand people who use remote explosives and that's a huge impact. You did not address that you just said "only one down vote per" which addresses people down voting for no reason/to be dicks, not people diwnvoting because they personally think your tactic is "cheap" |
korrah silain
True Illuminate
69
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 02:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Talos Vagheitan wrote:Read the part where they must be on your team. Also read the part where down voting too much will remove your ability to do so.
But besides that: A feature doesn't have to be 100% exploit proof. There are plenty of ways we can already grief each other in Dust, such as team killing in FW, but it's really not a problem
If they have to be on your team it will remove its effectiveness because a) people(me, personally anyway) dont tend to pay much attention to the teammates specific tactics, and b)people will be biased towards tactics that help them.
Also if you vote too often and lose the ability to vote then duh, do I need to point out how it loses effectiveness? Not to mention holy **** you get barred from an entire game mode for falling too low?! But yeah no mechanic is 100% exploit proof, but its OK if it gets exploited and bars people from content forcing them to grind ungodly ammounts of missions in pubs to even start to earn back into positives. Plus they better hope those are all good matches and not one-sided stomps, or else playing this game is going to become a chore... |
|
|
| |
|