DUST Search - [Video] Polt Bistol is just ridiculous...

Adipem Nothi wrote:

Sgt Kirk wrote:

Adipem Nothi wrote:

And a few more:

[quote=Sgt Kirk]All this nerf Breach AR nonsense and no one is calling out the Combat Rifle's overperformance still is hilarious to me.

Yep, you mind finding the multiple post where I take it back and say it does need to be repurposed while you're at it.

Like I said before in multiple post. You'll only find the post you want, the ones you don't find according to your wanted worldview are ones you discard.

And no, I don't care that you look through my history I have a problem with you showing halfs truths.

A half truth is not a truth at all.

These quotes are not untrue or half true. These are examples of Team Gallente double standards. These are examples of excusing imbalance. These are examples of defending an item that's being actively spammed as FoTM. And these examples aren't isolated instances.

On Page 1 of this thread, a weapon which admittedly needs tuning but is not over-utilized and absolutely not FoTM falls under Aeon's scrutiny. It isn't Gallente. He labels it "ridiculous" and "overpowered". On the other hand, we have a truly overpowered, truly over-utilized and truly FoTM Gallente Rifle. "Not overpowered." "It's just doing its job".


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 11	Posted - 2015.06.18 14:50:00 - [1] - Quote Oh look, Adipem is once again letting my name slip out of his Ad hominin mouth again. You ignore evidence that doesn't fit your argument anyway so I dont know why I'm trying. You've obviously dug through my history looking for things, once again. Why dont you go and find the post where I wanted the breach AR repurposed. Why dont you go and find the era of Bricked tanked Gallente scout and where I complained about them, Duvolle TAR era, the list can go on. No, lets ignore all that. Lets ignore when the Laser was clearly OP. Lets ignore when the Rail and Combat rifle first came out, or when both Dropships ruled the world or when explosive spam was the only viable way of killing people. List goes on but for the sake of your argument we will only focus on "them" is when they talk about nerfing something that's Caldari. Gasp how dare they? How dare they even consider not discriminating against racial weapons. As a did before, it's pretty clear you guys have some sort us childish "us vs them" mentality especially when you guys call us "Team Gallente" when it comes to balancing things. I guess by your logic I can be called team Amarr too because they need more assets in the game and back then their weapons sucked as bad as ours did. You and your character is nothing new to me. Since the game started when Shields were the best option there were people that still cried whenever I said their favorite toy or race was OP. Especially when I said Dual Tanking should not be as effective as it is but then people claimed it was because I was a vehicle guy and not an infantry man, even though was pretty obvious I play mostly assault. You always want to bring up race when it comes to this but its pretty damn clear when we talk about things that aren't Gallente or Caldari no one ever says a thing about bias but the second we make a thread about Gallente or Caldari its suddenly," you and your friends only want x for y. " I honestly have no time for this absurdly childish banter today, only having one day off this week. Just popping in because my name came out of your mouth again with false acquisitions with cherry picked information you love so much. Feel free to go back to arguing with ad homs against the other "Team Gallente". Enjoy those cherrys. >>"This is pretty unfair. People being worried that some suggested nerfs would be going too far, doesn't mean they weren't advocating nerfs. Particularly considering CCP tend to overdo nerfs and buffs.<<" This is very true and it works both ways. Cognitive Bias is once again the word for today. This message has been brought to you by the Tunnel Snakes. TUNNEL SNAKES RULE!
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 11	Posted - 2015.06.18 15:41:00 - [2] - Quote Varoth Drac wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: >>"This is pretty unfair. People being worried that some suggested nerfs would be going too far, doesn't mean they weren't advocating nerfs. Particularly considering CCP tend to overdo nerfs and buffs.<<" This is very true and it works both ways. Cognitive Bias is once again the word for today. This message has been brought to you by the Tunnel Snakes. Just to be clear, I am in no way involved with Adipem's comments about "Team Gallente" or anything like that. I'm not accusing anyone of bias and don't want to be dragged into it. I was purely commenting on the history of scout balancing discussions. Oh no, I'm not saying you were at all. I was just agreeing with your statement then started talking about those two again. TUNNEL SNAKES RULE!
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 11	Posted - 2015.06.18 18:59:00 - [3] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: And a few more: [quote=Sgt Kirk]All this nerf Breach AR nonsense and no one is calling out the Combat Rifle's overperformance still is hilarious to me. Yep, you mind finding the multiple post where I take it back and say it does need to be repurposed while you're at it. Like I said before in multiple post. You'll only find the post you want, the ones you don't find according to your wanted worldview are ones you discard. And no, I don't care that you look through my history I have a problem with you showing halfs truths. A half truth is not a truth at all. TUNNEL SNAKES RULE!
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 11	Posted - 2015.06.18 19:38:00 - [4] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: And a few more: [quote=Sgt Kirk]All this nerf Breach AR nonsense and no one is calling out the Combat Rifle's overperformance still is hilarious to me. Yep, you mind finding the multiple post where I take it back and say it does need to be repurposed while you're at it. Like I said before in multiple post. You'll only find the post you want, the ones you don't find according to your wanted worldview are ones you discard. And no, I don't care that you look through my history I have a problem with you showing halfs truths. A half truth is not a truth at all. These quotes are not untrue or half true. These are examples of Team Gallente double standards. These are examples of excusing imbalance. These are examples of defending an item that's being actively spammed as FoTM. And these examples aren't isolated instances. On Page 1 of this thread, a weapon which admittedly needs tuning but is not over-utilized and absolutely not FoTM falls under Aeon's scrutiny. It isn't Gallente. He labels it "ridiculous" and "overpowered". On the other hand, we have a truly overpowered, truly over-utilized and truly FoTM Gallente Rifle. "Not overpowered." "It's just doing its job". You all saw it ladies in gentleman. There's proof that I took back my words on the Breach AR after a week or two of debating and wanted to change it and here Adipem is ignoring that. One, if he does admit that he will bring another attack routing around to something around the area of my being wrong which discredits anything I have to say. Because normal human beings couldn't possibly be wrong about something. Or he will just continue to ignore it as you see here. Either way, he'll try to shift you opinion on his court. Lets see which path he takes! TUNNEL SNAKES RULE!
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 11	Posted - 2015.06.18 19:46:00 - [5] - Quote noob cavman wrote: I... Wha? Since when has the gal ar become op!? If I didn't enjoy the ar for fun fits and racial fits I would 90% of the time throw on a arr for the extra range. Or the cr There was about a month Rattati buffed the Breach AR after it was nerfed into uselessness. The Buff was a bit too strong but really all it needed was a range reduction (which is what it got). My biggest problem is that if it's supposed to emulate the Rail Rifle in a way, why isn't it longer range, less DPS and same RoF? TUNNEL SNAKES RULE!