DUST Search - Light Wep proficiency/fitting op = AV damage

Sicerly Yaw wrote:

Darkstalker Astrea wrote:

What if:

All (non AV) light weapons do damage to vehicles based on their proficiency level?
And you increase this output by leveling in fitting optimization

So if I use the rail rifle as an example (prof is armor based)

Add 20% damage efficiency to vehicle armor per level to the fitting optimization

This is not 20% additional damage, this allows you to do a percentage of dmg to a vehicle up to 100% - only based on what the weapons proficiency is.

So if the proficiency is armor then it can only do damage to armor. And vice versa for shields

Plasma cannon would be exempt from this
And
The mass driver would get either/or 10% - 15% per level because 100% damage might be too much (Minmando?)

I think weak spots should take full damage by regular weaponry or at least 50%+whatever bonus you get for hitting the weak spot

you do get more damage off on weak spots already more then the regular dmg so if you want to be more effective learn the weak spots and use them to your advantage

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Darkstalker Astrea Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 18	Posted - 2015.06.16 20:14:00 - [1] - Quote What if: All (non AV) light weapons do damage to vehicles based on their proficiency level? And you increase this output by leveling in fitting optimization So if I use the rail rifle as an example (prof is armor based) Add 20% damage efficiency to vehicle armor per level to the fitting optimization This is not 20% additional damage, this allows you to do a percentage of dmg to a vehicle up to 100% - only based on what the weapons proficiency is. So if the proficiency is armor then it can only do damage to armor. And vice versa for shields Plasma cannon would be exempt from this And The mass driver would get either/or 10% - 15% per level because 100% damage might be too much (Minmando?)
Zan Azikuchi G.R.A.V.E The Ditanian Alliance 96	Posted - 2015.06.16 23:54:00 - [2] - Quote Rather just have extra skills for the weapon's that allow that, proficiency however most notably need's to go back to being +15% straight damage and not this profile damage nonsense. When there is light, shadow's lurk and fear reign's... Yet by the blade of knight's, mankind, was given hope.
Harpyja 2	Posted - 2015.06.18 14:08:00 - [3] - Quote Because noobs still don't get the fact that you're not supposed to shoot at a tank with an AR?? "By His light, and His will"- The Scriptures, 12:32
Echo 1991 Dead Man's Game 859	Posted - 2015.06.18 15:14:00 - [4] - Quote Zan Azikuchi wrote: Rather just have extra skills for the weapon's that allow that, proficiency however most notably need's to go back to being +15% straight damage and not this profile damage nonsense. that's worse, cos then its still doing the same damage as before plus its doing more damage to the tank type its not effective against. Wanna play eve?
Echo 1991 Dead Man's Game 859	Posted - 2015.06.18 15:18:00 - [5] - Quote Harpyja wrote: Because noobs still don't get the fact that you're not supposed to shoot at a tank with an AR?? it should do damage, not enough to worry you but it should still do a smidge. Wanna play eve?
Megaman Trigger Ready to Play 364	Posted - 2015.06.18 21:56:00 - [6] - Quote Non-AV light arms fire shouldn't be able to damage a HAV. Leave AV work to the AV weapons. Purifier. First Class.
Mikel Arias Challengers 506 130	Posted - 2015.06.18 22:17:00 - [7] - Quote I get that they damage LAVs, but no way they should damage Havs.
Terry Webber Molon Labe. RUST415 754	Posted - 2015.06.18 22:39:00 - [8] - Quote Sorry to disappoint you, Darkstalker, but it would be best that a non-AV weapon shouldn't do a an actual AV weapons job. Inertial Booster Module Thread
Sicerly Yaw Quantum times 299	Posted - 2015.06.19 16:54:00 - [9] - Quote Darkstalker Astrea wrote: What if: All (non AV) light weapons do damage to vehicles based on their proficiency level? And you increase this output by leveling in fitting optimization So if I use the rail rifle as an example (prof is armor based) Add 20% damage efficiency to vehicle armor per level to the fitting optimization This is not 20% additional damage, this allows you to do a percentage of dmg to a vehicle up to 100% - only based on what the weapons proficiency is. So if the proficiency is armor then it can only do damage to armor. And vice versa for shields Plasma cannon would be exempt from this And The mass driver would get either/or 10% - 15% per level because 100% damage might be too much (Minmando?) I think weak spots should take full damage by regular weaponry or at least 50%+whatever bonus you get for hitting the weak spot you do get more damage off on weak spots already more then the regular dmg so if you want to be more effective learn the weak spots and use them to your advantage
Megaman Trigger Ready to Play 364	Posted - 2015.06.19 17:16:00 - [10] - Quote Sicerly Yaw wrote: Darkstalker Astrea wrote: What if: All (non AV) light weapons do damage to vehicles based on their proficiency level? And you increase this output by leveling in fitting optimization So if I use the rail rifle as an example (prof is armor based) Add 20% damage efficiency to vehicle armor per level to the fitting optimization This is not 20% additional damage, this allows you to do a percentage of dmg to a vehicle up to 100% - only based on what the weapons proficiency is. So if the proficiency is armor then it can only do damage to armor. And vice versa for shields Plasma cannon would be exempt from this And The mass driver would get either/or 10% - 15% per level because 100% damage might be too much (Minmando?) I think weak spots should take full damage by regular weaponry or at least 50%+whatever bonus you get for hitting the weak spot you do get more damage off on weak spots already more then the regular dmg so if you want to be more effective learn the weak spots and use them to your advantage Why should non-AV weapons cut into the Avers role? Purifier. First Class.



Pages: 1 :: [one page]