Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46582/46582f98ec0fb36892e611c4666112455ef98359" alt="Darkstalker Astrea Darkstalker Astrea"
Darkstalker Astrea
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
18
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.16 20:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
What if:
All (non AV) light weapons do damage to vehicles based on their proficiency level? And you increase this output by leveling in fitting optimization
So if I use the rail rifle as an example (prof is armor based)
Add 20% damage efficiency to vehicle armor per level to the fitting optimization
This is not 20% additional damage, this allows you to do a percentage of dmg to a vehicle up to 100% - only based on what the weapons proficiency is.
So if the proficiency is armor then it can only do damage to armor. And vice versa for shields
Plasma cannon would be exempt from this And The mass driver would get either/or 10% - 15% per level because 100% damage might be too much (Minmando?) |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc4b/1bc4b0f1988e1363ebab73904ca7a5a959721632" alt="Zan Azikuchi Zan Azikuchi"
Zan Azikuchi
G.R.A.V.E The Ditanian Alliance
96
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.16 23:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Rather just have extra skills for the weapon's that allow that, proficiency however most notably need's to go back to being +15% straight damage and not this profile damage nonsense.
When there is light, shadow's lurk and fear reign's... Yet by the blade of knight's, mankind, was given hope.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39e8a/39e8aed40d150ccdaf02d86619e4b799b4a2fe81" alt="Harpyja Harpyja"
Harpyja
2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.18 14:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
Because noobs still don't get the fact that you're not supposed to shoot at a tank with an AR??
"By His light, and His will"- The Scriptures, 12:32
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cdf6/8cdf6444262cf0ef008e4cd976fbbfef2f5b0806" alt="Echo 1991 Echo 1991"
Echo 1991
Dead Man's Game
859
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.18 15:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
Zan Azikuchi wrote:Rather just have extra skills for the weapon's that allow that, proficiency however most notably need's to go back to being +15% straight damage and not this profile damage nonsense. that's worse, cos then its still doing the same damage as before plus its doing more damage to the tank type its not effective against.
Wanna play eve?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cdf6/8cdf6444262cf0ef008e4cd976fbbfef2f5b0806" alt="Echo 1991 Echo 1991"
Echo 1991
Dead Man's Game
859
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.18 15:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:Because noobs still don't get the fact that you're not supposed to shoot at a tank with an AR?? it should do damage, not enough to worry you but it should still do a smidge.
Wanna play eve?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cdf6/8cdf6444262cf0ef008e4cd976fbbfef2f5b0806" alt="Megaman Trigger Megaman Trigger"
Megaman Trigger
Ready to Play
364
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.18 21:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Non-AV light arms fire shouldn't be able to damage a HAV. Leave AV work to the AV weapons.
Purifier. First Class.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cdf6/8cdf6444262cf0ef008e4cd976fbbfef2f5b0806" alt="Mikel Arias Mikel Arias"
Mikel Arias
Challengers 506
130
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.18 22:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
I get that they damage LAVs, but no way they should damage Havs. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cdf6/8cdf6444262cf0ef008e4cd976fbbfef2f5b0806" alt="Terry Webber Terry Webber"
Terry Webber
Molon Labe. RUST415
754
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.18 22:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sorry to disappoint you, Darkstalker, but it would be best that a non-AV weapon shouldn't do a an actual AV weapons job.
Inertial Booster Module Thread
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c792/5c792bcf8eefd1aea5db50301886c574c161db72" alt="Sicerly Yaw Sicerly Yaw"
Sicerly Yaw
Quantum times
299
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.19 16:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
Darkstalker Astrea wrote:What if:
All (non AV) light weapons do damage to vehicles based on their proficiency level? And you increase this output by leveling in fitting optimization
So if I use the rail rifle as an example (prof is armor based)
Add 20% damage efficiency to vehicle armor per level to the fitting optimization
This is not 20% additional damage, this allows you to do a percentage of dmg to a vehicle up to 100% - only based on what the weapons proficiency is.
So if the proficiency is armor then it can only do damage to armor. And vice versa for shields
Plasma cannon would be exempt from this And The mass driver would get either/or 10% - 15% per level because 100% damage might be too much (Minmando?)
I think weak spots should take full damage by regular weaponry or at least 50%+whatever bonus you get for hitting the weak spot
you do get more damage off on weak spots already more then the regular dmg so if you want to be more effective learn the weak spots and use them to your advantage |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cdf6/8cdf6444262cf0ef008e4cd976fbbfef2f5b0806" alt="Megaman Trigger Megaman Trigger"
Megaman Trigger
Ready to Play
364
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933d/c933d60294680cd0c5b40b093ffcd43015ea5577" alt="View only posts by author View only posts by author" |
Posted - 2015.06.19 17:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sicerly Yaw wrote:Darkstalker Astrea wrote:What if:
All (non AV) light weapons do damage to vehicles based on their proficiency level? And you increase this output by leveling in fitting optimization
So if I use the rail rifle as an example (prof is armor based)
Add 20% damage efficiency to vehicle armor per level to the fitting optimization
This is not 20% additional damage, this allows you to do a percentage of dmg to a vehicle up to 100% - only based on what the weapons proficiency is.
So if the proficiency is armor then it can only do damage to armor. And vice versa for shields
Plasma cannon would be exempt from this And The mass driver would get either/or 10% - 15% per level because 100% damage might be too much (Minmando?) I think weak spots should take full damage by regular weaponry or at least 50%+whatever bonus you get for hitting the weak spot you do get more damage off on weak spots already more then the regular dmg so if you want to be more effective learn the weak spots and use them to your advantage
Why should non-AV weapons cut into the Avers role?
Purifier. First Class.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |