DUST Search - Perma Scanned: What changed?

All Channels

General Discussions

Perma Scanned: What changed?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Petra 222 SoM Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 90	Posted - 2015.06.13 17:38:00 - [1] - Quote When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think?
PLAYSTTION Corrosive Synergy No Context 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 17:41:00 - [2] - Quote Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? The community said ARs were OP to. Now they are receiving a second buff. Galassault Galogi Galsent Galmando Galscout `Open Beta Vet - 46 mil sp Director of Corrosive Synergy`
Scheneighnay McBob Tribal Liberation Force Paramilitary 7	Posted - 2015.06.13 17:42:00 - [3] - Quote PLAYSTTION wrote: Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? The community said ARs were OP to. Now they are receiving a second buff. They definitely did not say that any time recently. Last time I heard "ARs are OP" was in beta, when they were like assault scramblers are now. Rule 34.6.1: every parody will have a crossover
danthrax martin Bad Blueberries 382	Posted - 2015.06.13 17:57:00 - [4] - Quote If a match doesn't have much scans...awesome. if I'm scanned for a few mins, I go pro gal scout and will team scan them back while hunting theirs. I still wish for a game mode or socket impervious to scans. Suicidal A/V Moron Suicidal Logi "All I wanted was a Pepsi!"
Melchiah ARANeAE The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 670	Posted - 2015.06.13 18:57:00 - [5] - Quote I think people just got bored of complaining about it. danthrax martin wrote: If a match doesn't have much scans...awesome. if I'm scanned for a few mins, I go pro gal scout and will team scan them back while hunting theirs. I still wish for a game mode or socket impervious to scans. I'd go the way of a jamming equipment. Just use nanohives assets to create an aoe where scan profiles in a 10m/12.5m/15m area are reduced by 6dB/10dB/14dB for basic/ADV/PRO and only the highest one applies. We want cake and tea.
Boot Booter Eat Your Cookies INC 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 19:00:00 - [6] - Quote I think people are more split because the active scanners are substantially nerfed compared to when they first were "abused". I remember you could simply spin in a circle and scan the whole map. However there needs to be some hard counter other than dampeners. Because frankly it's bs that a single equipment slot has so much power. I'm thinking a deployable tacnet jammer would be amazing. Any enemy within the range of the jammer would have their tacnet go offline. Anything other than 1 player forcing the entire enemy team to fit two proto dampeners. That's ******* stupid.
DDx77 Random Gunz Rise Of Legion. 302	Posted - 2015.06.13 19:14:00 - [7] - Quote Melchiah ARANeAE wrote: I think people just got bored of complaining about it. danthrax martin wrote: If a match doesn't have much scans...awesome. if I'm scanned for a few mins, I go pro gal scout and will team scan them back while hunting theirs. I still wish for a game mode or socket impervious to scans. I'd go the way of a jamming equipment. Just use nanohives assets to create an aoe where scan profiles in a 10m/12.5m/15m area are reduced by 6dB/10dB/14dB for basic/ADV/PRO and only the highest one applies. - That's..........a very good idea. Sorry good ideas for scanners don't pass the gatekeepers in this place.
DDx77 Random Gunz Rise Of Legion. 303	Posted - 2015.06.13 19:20:00 - [8] - Quote Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? -- I've been pretty vocal, I even have a decoy nanohive idea somewhere buried in features and ideas I mostly just get blown up though. I am waiting for the inb4 use dampeners trolls that clearly have no idea what they are talking about I think based on all the nerfs to scouts and cloaks they could safely move scans back to squad and everything will be just dandy
P14GU3 UNIVERSAL C.A.R.N.A.G.E 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 19:21:00 - [9] - Quote I think eliminating the cool down, and making them be held like rep tools to work would be a big help in scanner spam. No more gallogis with 4 slots full of scanners. You want to permascan, you sacrifice a gun. I am also not a fan of the current way that ewar works in general. I think there needs to be a chance to scan, say 40% base and lowering the db made that chance lower. Gallogis would get a bonus to that percent, say 70% at max. So a maxed out scout would have like a 50% chance of going undetected by a gallogi. Even a heavy would have say a 20-30% chance of going undetected. Now granted, I pulled these numbers out of my @ss, but it seems better than the current all or nothing approach. 'Sault AK.0 - Logi AK.0 - Logi GK.0 - Scout GK.0 - 'Mando MK.0 - Masshole in every sense of the word.
Squagga Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 762	Posted - 2015.06.13 19:21:00 - [10] - Quote I have no idea what you guys are going on about. It really doesn't bother me that much. I don't see it constantly the entire match. And guess what? There's a little notice. It says "you have been scanned". Now I know there's someone on the enemy team, in the area. Time to go find their stupid asses Shields, the silent killer.

PLAYSTTION Corrosive Synergy No Context 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 21:24:00 - [11] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: PLAYSTTION wrote: Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? The community said ARs were OP to. Now they are receiving a second buff. They definitely did not say that any time recently. Last time I heard "ARs are OP" was in beta, when they were like assault scramblers are now. 'ARs are OP' was all the rage in 1.6. Galassault Galogi Galsent Galmando Galscout `Open Beta Vet - 46.5 mil sp Director of Corrosive Synergy`
Jadek Menaheim Xer Cloud Consortium 6	Posted - 2015.06.13 21:59:00 - [12] - Quote Frankly I'd be fine if your tac net showed you the general direction you were scanned from Dust 514 Market Trello. The essential resource for trading in Dust.
Magewarlord KILL-EM-QUICK Rise Of Legion. 103	Posted - 2015.06.13 22:16:00 - [13] - Quote I think 'radar jammers' would be the perfect opponent for the scanner. then I can run 2 quantum scans, 1 jammer, and an uplink.... MWAHAHAHA!
Petra 222 SoM Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 90	Posted - 2015.06.13 22:44:00 - [14] - Quote Squagga wrote: I have no idea what you guys are going on about. It really doesn't bother me that much. I don't see it constantly the entire match. And guess what? There's a little notice. It says "you have been scanned". Now I know there's someone on the enemy team, in the area. Time to go find their stupid asses There's a notice? haven't seen it before.,, Just so you know, it takes a lot of self control for me not to verbally abuse you like a red headed step child. Your posts hurts my brain.
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 22:56:00 - [15] - Quote Squagga wrote: I have no idea what you guys are going on about. It really doesn't bother me that much. I don't see it constantly the entire match. And guess what? There's a little notice. It says "you have been scanned". Now I know there's someone on the enemy team, in the area. Time to go find their stupid asses I agree with this guy. If I get the warning I adjust what I'm doing accordingly. OR I keep doing what I'm doing without any illusion of being unnoticed as I do it. What I don't do is expect to be in a far-future gamescape that doesn't utilize at the very least current day technology. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
Sgt Kirk Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 11	Posted - 2015.06.13 22:59:00 - [16] - Quote Normally when I get scanned I use that to my advantage and let them come to me. Charged Ion Pistol shot, they never expect it and while they are freaking out you take them out. TUNNEL SNAKES RULE!
Kinky Fat Bastard OMFGZOMBIESRUN 24	Posted - 2015.06.14 00:18:00 - [17] - Quote Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? What's changed? I imagine, in the time since scanners were last nerfed the players who QQ'd about them then now use them as a crutch or run a gal scout.
TIGER SHARK1501 Savage Bullet RUST415 239	Posted - 2015.06.14 01:26:00 - [18] - Quote Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? Not a problem. Have you specced into profile dampening?
Tech Ohm Eaven Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 1	Posted - 2015.06.14 03:07:00 - [19] - Quote Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? i think many did my solution delete dust 514 sell ps3 hello ps4 that fixed many problems related to dust 514 if theres a ps4 port then ok and if not then no problem
Pocket Rocket Girl Psygod9 444	Posted - 2015.06.14 04:11:00 - [20] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: PLAYSTTION wrote: Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? The community said ARs were OP to. Now they are receiving a second buff. They definitely did not say that any time recently. Last time I heard "ARs are OP" was in beta, when they were like assault scramblers are now. You mean Duvolle514? Have garbage gun game? Throw a Core.

Pocket Rocket Girl Psygod9 444	Posted - 2015.06.14 04:14:00 - [21] - Quote danthrax martin wrote: If a match doesn't have much scans...awesome. if I'm scanned for a few mins, I go pro gal scout and will team scan them back while hunting theirs. I still wish for a game mode or socket impervious to scans. it would be awesome to see that. different sockets different effects you might be on to something there Have garbage gun game? Throw a Core.
P14GU3 UNIVERSAL C.A.R.N.A.G.E 1	Posted - 2015.06.14 04:32:00 - [22] - Quote Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? i think many did my solution delete dust 514 sell ps3 hello ps4 that fixed many problems related to dust 514 if theres a ps4 port then ok and if not then no problem And yet you still hang out on the forums shitposting. 'Sault AK.0 - Logi AK.0 - Logi GK.0 - Scout GK.0 - 'Mando MK.0 - Masshole in every sense of the word.
Reign Omega T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K 1	Posted - 2015.06.14 05:07:00 - [23] - Quote P14GU3 wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? i think many did my solution delete dust 514 sell ps3 hello ps4 that fixed many problems related to dust 514 if theres a ps4 port then ok and if not then no problem And yet you still hang out on the forums shitposting. Dang... got em. (Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!! The Incursions are back... and they're golden baby!
Regis Blackbird DUST University Ivy League 979	Posted - 2015.06.14 05:53:00 - [24] - Quote Melchiah ARANeAE wrote: I think people just got bored of complaining about it. danthrax martin wrote: If a match doesn't have much scans...awesome. if I'm scanned for a few mins, I go pro gal scout and will team scan them back while hunting theirs. I still wish for a game mode or socket impervious to scans. I'd go the way of a jamming equipment. Just use nanohives assets to create an aoe where scan profiles in a 10m/12.5m/15m area are reduced by 6dB/10dB/14dB for basic/ADV/PRO and only the highest one applies. While I like the idea, I think it will be difficult to implement and adds an extra complex layer to a already complex system. I would prefer if the active scanner (when activated) raises the scan profile of the player using the scanner. So, you might see everybody else, but you just painted a huge bullseye on your back . Risk and reward and all that. Edit: ^ This would also mean you would have to be more careful when and where to scan, to not blow your own squad position. The gameplay will become way more tactical, as there will be cases when you care more about your own position rather than the enemy.
Petra 222 SoM Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 92	Posted - 2015.06.14 14:47:00 - [25] - Quote Sgt Kirk wrote: Normally when I get scanned I use that to my advantage and let them come to me. Charged Ion Pistol shot, they never expect it and while they are freaking out you take them out. Yes this can be can be a good tactic for a high Hp slayer role, especially when the opposing team is likely scanned as well. But, what about support roles? and what happens to tactical equipment use? Vehicle VS AV? Breaking the redline? The entire flow of matches are different when teams are lit up across the map. Maybe for the better? I have no problem slaying in any meta the game throws at me. And Gal scout was my first of 6 proto suits, so if i dont want to be scanned, I sure as hell wont be. My support roles, on the other hand, are having a harder time contributing.
Aeon Amadi Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback 10	Posted - 2015.06.14 14:56:00 - [26] - Quote Some of us aren't scared of Scanners because we know that even if they see us, they have to kill us. Its the profile tanked Scouts that are never on TacNET that **** me off because I don't stand a fighting chance against sergeant Predator-Gimmick-Kill and his 'Dren' Shotgun even running the best gear. Design a Skin Challenge POLL (Vote Now!)
Petra 222 SoM Opus Arcana Covert Intervention 92	Posted - 2015.06.14 15:05:00 - [27] - Quote TIGER SHARK1501 wrote: Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? Not a problem. Have you specced into profile dampening? Yes, all cores maxed long ago. This is only really affective with scouts though (2 complex damps). All other suits on the field will have to sacrifice multiple slots to counter that logi's 1 piece of equipment.
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.14 20:21:00 - [28] - Quote http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tvrPT3tpjZY Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
Tesfa Alem Death by Disassociation 1	Posted - 2015.06.14 20:39:00 - [29] - Quote Petra 222 SoM wrote: When I first started visiting the forums, one of the most vocalized complaints that the community agreed on was their dislike for the abuse of active scanners. Everyone hated having the line 'You have been scanned' burned onto their displays. Well, now the scanner abuse has returned yet the community seems more divided on the subject. So what has changed? Is the community scarred from past meta? Is it better playing with the majority of players visible at 200m through walls? What do you think? Scouts used their passive scan advantage to a devastating effect. That's what most of the scan opponents are leaving out. It was okay for them if you passive scan and have a 10 meter radar advantage and the enemy could not pick you up at all. That was considered fair. Over time more and more people specced into gal logi to counter the scouts. As scouts lost their superiority more people specced into assaults. Assaults can't even ewar. Don't need proto scans to pick up the enemy anymore, scans became more popular. To add to all of this, turns out the best counter to the enemy pubs stomping and devastate people using scans is to scan them right back. If you want to kill active scanning fine. But then toss that passive scanning out too. Redline for Thee, but no Redline for Me. "I sometimes wonder why I share stuff "- CCP Rattati


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.