DUST Search - Let's talk about the Scout: Racial bonuses and inferred roles.

All Channels

General Discussions

Let's talk about the Scout: Racial bonuses and inferred roles.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.11 23:54:00 - [1] - Quote inb4qqlogis damn, too late. <3s anyways. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.12 00:19:00 - [2] - Quote I would love to have my hacking bonus back, btw. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.12 01:11:00 - [3] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I stopped taking you seriously once you suggested using kincats with knives. I run KinCats on all my knifing fits. Am I doing it wrong? only if you're complaining about not being damped enough. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.12 01:19:00 - [4] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I stopped taking you seriously once you suggested using kincats with knives. I run KinCats on all my knifing fits. Am I doing it wrong? only if you're complaining about not being damped enough. I believe you dropped this: * hands crutch * Thank you, here these are yours. slowly pours out bucket of tears Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.12 03:30:00 - [5] - Quote intermittent short period long-cooldown scan bump! Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 17:56:00 - [6] - Quote So when do we get to the part that explains why intermittent scans in limited areas is a crutch but permanent tacnet invisibility in all areas isn't? And Gus, the Apidem guy is Shotty Go Bang. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 18:58:00 - [7] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: So when do we get to the part that explains why intermittent scans in limited areas is a crutch but permanent tacnet invisibility in all areas isn't? Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 19:13:00 - [8] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: So when do we get to the part that explains why intermittent scans in limited areas is a crutch but permanent tacnet invisibility in all areas isn't? So....deafening, the crickets in this section of the forums are. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 20:16:00 - [9] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: So when do we get to the part that explains why intermittent scans in limited areas is a crutch but permanent tacnet invisibility in all areas isn't? "TacNet Invisibility" isn't accurate. Assuming Arirana's figures were implemented... They aren't, they're hypothetical. Wheras the "intermittent scanning is a crutch but permanent invisibility isn't" thing is presented very much as a non-hypothetical. I'd be a fool to dismiss the balance-minded perspectives from highly experienced [others]. You got that last part right. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 20:54:00 - [10] - Quote el OPERATOR wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: So when do we get to the part that explains why intermittent scans in limited areas is a crutch but permanent tacnet invisibility in all areas isn't? I do ok at keeping a topic on topic and avoiding the redherring trash that goes for "arguement" in certain circles. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR

el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 21:08:00 - [11] - Quote Adipem Nothi wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: So when do we get to the part that explains why intermittent scans in limited areas is a crutch but permanent tacnet invisibility in all areas isn't? I do ok at keeping a topic on topic and avoiding the redherring trash that goes for "arguement" in certain circles. "Permanent TacNet Invisibility" isn't presently possible, nor has it been proposed by anyone in this thread. Perhaps you can better explain what you mean by "permanent tacnet invisibility" if you mean something other than permanent tacnet invisibility. As for 21dB GalLogi scans, yes these are arguably out-of-balance, but this is an altogether separate issue. Arguably anything and everything is out of balance. Why are scans a crutch but tacnet invisibility not ? Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 21:16:00 - [12] - Quote Ace Ravager wrote: Scouts are supposed to be used for recon purposes even though that never happens in the game. Though scouts can easily slip past enemy lines and wreak havoc. And then cry on the forums about how they got scanned while doing it. What?!? Scouts aren't supposed to be point defenders or assaults? Well, there went all that hard earned meta.... Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 21:18:00 - [13] - Quote knight guard fury wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Apidem Nothi wrote: "Permanent TacNet Invisibility" isn't presently possible, nor has it been proposed by anyone in this thread. Perhaps you can better explain what you mean by "permanent tacnet invisibility" if you mean something other than permanent tacnet invisibility. As for 21dB GalLogi scans, yes these are arguably out-of-balance, but this is an altogether separate issue. Arguably anything and everything is out of balance. Why are scans a crutch but tacnet invisibility is not ? Specifically what do you mean by "tacnet invisibility" and specifically how would units achieve it? i think he means not bieng able to be seen on the tac net The grammer sucks but after an edit the idea is close enough. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 21:27:00 - [14] - Quote I recon in a scout. Its peachy. Except when I'm a ****** and don't recon. Then its a deathtrap. Am I experienced enough yet? Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 21:48:00 - [15] - Quote Ace Ravager wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: Ace Ravager wrote: Scouts are supposed to be used for recon purposes even though that never happens in the game. Though scouts can easily slip past enemy lines and wreak havoc. And then cry on the forums about how they got scanned while doing it. What?!? Scouts aren't supposed to be point defenders or assaults? Well, there went all that hard earned meta.... Why did u add that part to my post Its an Easter Egg for the sharp of eye and accurate of memory. Congratulations, You've won! Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR
el OPERATOR Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2015.06.13 21:50:00 - [16] - Quote Alright, I gtg, I feel like I'm going to begin getting petty and start parsing dumb ****. Hope you're able to get what you're looking for, Ari. Open-Beta Vet. CAPCRO Nomad. DUST514 is WARFARE, not WAR-FAIR

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.