| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Haerr
The Rainbow Effect
Negative-Feedback
3
   |
Posted - 2015.06.05 06:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
A) Excellent! Second to none.
B) Not quite good enough.
C) Other.
What do you think GD?
Jumping is Strafing UP
|
Ceadda Sai
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
102
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 06:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Haerr wrote:A) Excellent! Second to none.
B) Not quite good enough.
C) Other.
What do you think GD?
Depends aim assist on or not? I think many mercs rely heavily on the whole spray and pray mechanic on close up fights, where you stand less of a chance at a distance, varies by the weapon of choice.
"I love the smell of Warbarge Laser Strikes in the morning... Smells like, Victory!"
|
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken
Going for the gold
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 07:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
I never played any other FPS so I wouldn't know, but I feel like they're pretty good.
:(
|
VAHZZ
The Nerf Herders
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 07:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Not as good as Halo, way more responsive than Call of DukeBuddies. Can't compare to Battlefront II though, Star Wars had that **** down on point, best **** ever. So, DUSTs aiming is in the middle. Hit detection and TTK is another story....
"I bring nothing, I bless nothing, I save nothing; I just erase; completely, shatter."
|
Indianna Pwns
TERRA R1SING
New Eden's Heros
127
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 07:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
Dust's aiming is really bad. Sure you can get used to it, but then you play other FPS's and the realisation hits once more. |
Adan Montano Pietsch
Sebiestor Field Sappers
Minmatar Republic
37
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 09:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
C) complete ****
Which Faction am I loyal to, you ask? The real question is, which one is paying the most?
|
Lightning35 Delta514
48TH SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCE
569
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 10:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
A
48th Special Operations Force
Twitter-@48SOF
|
Sinboto Simmons
Dead Man's Game
8
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 10:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
Feels like it was made for the mouse and keyboard, you need to be far too accurate for it to have been intentionally intended for the ds3 controller.
Forum Warrior level 5 Prof 2
Join eve online today mercs
|
KingBabar
The Rainbow Effect
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 10:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Well, if you've played MAG then Dust seems a bit like its made by amateurs...
Spkr4theDead wrote:
Says the guy that was quitting the game because CCP were nerfing fused locus grenades.
|
Spaceman-Rob
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
820
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 12:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
The aiming is pretty good actually due to the not very strong aim assist, problem is the low frame rate which messes up your aiming. |
|
|
abdullah muzaffar
Random Gunz
Rise Of Legion.
602
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 12:51:00 -
[11] - Quote
C: Terrible.
Controller:Not enough sensitivity adjustments. High ingame movement speeds make it difficult to track. No custom mapping.
M/Kb:Worst implementation ever. Either it moves waay to little or it just flies off. Sensitivity options are screwed ingame, mouse smoothing is waay too limiting. Kb doesnt have custom remaps. No way to get raw input, messes with muscle memory.
PSMove: $$$$$$$#&@@$%&%%#@##$. Might as well be removed, saving us the 3-5 seconds at startup.
IJR took my soul. RIP 20/3/15 5:14
|
Nocturnal Soul
Primordial Threat
6
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 13:00:00 -
[12] - Quote
Better than Destiny
"The Wrath of God is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
|
Vrain Matari
Mikramurka Shock Troop
Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 13:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
C) Pretty frakkin' far from alright.
Without aim assist Dust has terrible and abrupt low-deflection sensitivity, this is why right-stick aiming is so important in Dust. Weapon handling and tracking is off also - there's a great set of videos out there somewhere in which a dedicated player went to great lengths to demonstrate exactly what the issues were to the Devs. Iirc the thread was noticed but nothing ever came of it.
With aim assist we get exploitation of the mechanic by kb/m emulators and everybody makes shots that they shouldn't. The aim assist in Dust is not so much to balance controllers vs kb/m but to cover up CCP's aiming controls and hit detection.
As far as the lag argument goes, increasing game performance always makes any game feel better, of course Dust would benefit from increased framerate. But the low-deflection sensitivity behaves the same in high-lag and low-lag situations and the behavior of the POV while moving is also a code-based problem, so framerate can only fix so much in this game. The rest is on the devs.
PSN: RationalSpark
|
Clone D
Solo Zen
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 13:31:00 -
[14] - Quote
Talking about aiming mechanism alone, not hit detection.
C) Other
Needs max value of X Y sensitivity increase.
Aiming is sluggish during a firefight. Is this by design?
Changing between aiming states takes too long.
Changing between aiming states can cause unexpected offsets to current target (especially if turning).
Aiming and ADS while traveling over uneven terrain is atrocious (again offsets).
WHERE SHOULD I AIM? Sometimes sight is not directly in the center of the screen (due to offset). Should I use the sight or the center of the screen at that point? |
CommanderBolt
KILL-EM-QUICK
Rise Of Legion.
3
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 13:45:00 -
[15] - Quote
C. Other.
(Sh*t)
I just got a new Roccat mouse n keyboard, nothing too fancy but its a lot better than what I had before. 1k hertz polling rate, 2000 dpi (as opposed to my old mouse that was less than 1000dpi).....
Long story short my new KB/M is really nice on PC, been having sweet battles in Battlefield 4. It felt even better than my old one that's for sure. However for some strange strange reason... even though my new mouse has double the dpi and a higher polling rate, even at max settings and MAX sensitivity settings it is MUCH slower in DUST than my old mouse.
Aiming now is like a mouse drag marathon just to turn 180 deg.
No wonder most KB/M players stopped using KB/M a long time ago..... FML 
"Madness how we turned our common-ground into a battle-ground.." - Essa
|
Aramis Madrigal
0uter.Heaven
436
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 14:17:00 -
[16] - Quote
Sinboto Simmons wrote:Feels like it was made for the mouse and keyboard, you need to be far too accurate for it to have been intentionally intended for the ds3 controller.
As a long time Kb/M player, it doesn't feel like this game was made for me :). |
Billy Jr
Eternal Beings
149
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 17:34:00 -
[17] - Quote
KingBabar wrote:Well, if you've played MAG then Dust seems a bit like its made by amateurs...
Considering that MAG did a number things better than Dust has, including large-scale battles and encouraging teamwork, that's an understatement. |
Mejt0
Dead Man's Game
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 20:35:00 -
[18] - Quote
Compared to?
It is bad/good compared to other games.
Compared to PC shooters (low TTK, aiming means everything) it's not as good.
Compared to other console shooters (higher TTK) it's decent.
Hit detection is wonky, recoil/kick is not noticeable. You should know what i mean.
Ps. Give examples next time.
Cuz it's like saying : this apple is delicious!
Without knowing how other apples taste.
Loyal to The State
Member of : State Protectorate
Belongs to : Patriots power bloc
Civire Bloodline
|
Indianna Pwns
TERRA R1SING
New Eden's Heros
129
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 20:49:00 -
[19] - Quote
Mejt0 wrote:Compared to?
It is bad/good compared to other games.
Compared to PC shooters (low TTK, aiming means everything) it's not as good.
Compared to other console shooters (higher TTK) it's decent.
Hit detection is wonky, recoil/kick is not noticeable. You should know what i mean.
Ps. Give examples next time.
Cuz it's like saying : this apple is delicious!
Without knowing how other apples taste.
Its to twitchy and sensitive at the middle of the stick and to slow at the the edge. Also the transition in sensitivity from the middle to the outside of the stick is not smooth enough.
A game with great twin stick aiming mechanics is bad company 2, playing that and then coming back to dust its night and day.
I don't see why the aiming mechanics cant be looked at again by rattati. |
Mejt0
Dead Man's Game
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 22:26:00 -
[20] - Quote
Indianna Pwns wrote:Mejt0 wrote:Compared to?
It is bad/good compared to other games.
Compared to PC shooters (low TTK, aiming means everything) it's not as good.
Compared to other console shooters (higher TTK) it's decent.
Hit detection is wonky, recoil/kick is not noticeable. You should know what i mean.
Ps. Give examples next time.
Cuz it's like saying : this apple is delicious!
Without knowing how other apples taste. Its to twitchy and sensitive at the middle of the stick and to slow at the the edge. Also the transition in sensitivity from the middle to the outside of the stick is not smooth enough. A game with great twin stick aiming mechanics is bad company 2, playing that and then coming back to dust its night and day. I don't see why the aiming mechanics cant be looked at again by rattati.
Probably because :
a) they don't want to (lazy)
b) they would mess it up even more
Loyal to The State
Member of : State Protectorate
Belongs to : Patriots power bloc
Civire Bloodline
|
|
|
J0LLY R0G3R
Negative-Feedback.
3
|
Posted - 2015.06.06 00:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
Haerr wrote:A) Excellent! Second to none.
B) Not quite good enough.
C) Other.
What do you think GD?
B. a little too assisted by the aim assist. Hip fire up close sure, but being able to so easily hip fire at range is ehhh.
XD
TheYoutube XD
|
Talos Vagheitan
Ancient Exiles.
1
|
Posted - 2015.06.06 01:53:00 -
[22] - Quote
I feel it's aight.
You just have to get used to it. Like any game.
I thought battlefield 3 was clunky and weird when I got used to it.
Halo did it best tho. Smoooooooooth
!--CCP, PORT DUST 2.0 TO XB1 AND PS4 AS THE FIRST CROSS PLATFORM SHOOTER--!
|
First Prophet
Nos Nothi
3
|
Posted - 2015.06.06 05:55:00 -
[23] - Quote
B
"The Wrath of Rust is Immense. His Justice is Swift and Decisive. His Tolerance is Limited."
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |