|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3178
   |
Posted - 2015.05.16 20:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:I know you vehicle users have a lot of prolific whiners on the forums but let it be known that there seems to be as many infantry players that seem to want to hold back further vehicle usage.
I for one would welcome huge maps that really favour dropship and fast LAV usage or some other clever level design ideas.. Tank's already have an important role in many maps, a good tanker can easily own countless infantry if they play smart at specific locations.
Lets give regular LAV`s and dropships more to do ehh? (Remember that Scout LAV, I still have a fitting for that in my fitting screen.... want to use again! CCP Stick a cloak on the scout LAV plzzzz)
And that role is what exactly? At current, they are just big ass slayers of everything they see. If they were taken out of the equation, there would be little change to the flow of the matches.
Top lel
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3182
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 22:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Making maps either infantry or vehicle based ends up with screwing people out of gameplay, and separates the playerbase. This has also been time and time again shown to simply not work, as for example Planerside 2 trying to cater to one or another just straight fails for both sides. That applies with gamemodes. Simply making a gamemode use vehicles as infantry doesn't help vehicles become better roled, and therefore in general better to use for pilots, it probably won't even be a good mode in the first place due to the cost of vehicles.
This idea of balancing based of a dichotomy needs to stop. It doesn't lead to balance, it leads to imbalance.
Top lel
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3182
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 22:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:"Counter the trend of Infantry everywhere?"
This sentence alone makes me want to dismiss you into the same limbo of mockery I consign the whiny nerds who cry that vehicles should be removed from acquisition. You don't even have a 1.0 KDR. Please do not speak in any thread which asks for the opinion of an individual who is properly enlightened as to the workings of the game. Especially if you are going to do so in a derogatory manner.
Oh wow, you are either the dumbest person alive, or the slickest troll.
Top lel
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3184
|
Posted - 2015.05.17 22:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:CommanderBolt wrote:I know you vehicle users have a lot of prolific whiners on the forums but let it be known that there seems to be as many infantry players that seem to want to hold back further vehicle usage.
I for one would welcome huge maps that really favour dropship and fast LAV usage or some other clever level design ideas.. Tank's already have an important role in many maps, a good tanker can easily own countless infantry if they play smart at specific locations.
Lets give regular LAV`s and dropships more to do ehh? (Remember that Scout LAV, I still have a fitting for that in my fitting screen.... want to use again! CCP Stick a cloak on the scout LAV plzzzz) And that role is what exactly? At current, they are just big ass slayers of everything they see. If they were taken out of the equation, there would be little change to the flow of the matches. Tanks slaying infantry and vehicles is there role. It forces people to take out the new big threat. I would love actual objectives for HAV`s and vehicles such as "Blow up this gate to the complex for vehicle access" , "blow up this power generator to knock out enemy MCC shields / Defend this power generator" etc...
1: Their*
2: Slaying is done by ever single suit and vehicle in the game. That is not a role. Again, if it was taken out of the equation, little would change.
3: It being able to defend or destroy structures is vastly different than killing everything.
Top lel
|
|
|
| |
|