NK's are valid sidearms, used all the time in many armies of today, and will probably be used in armies of tomorrow, not only due to their utility, but due to being quiet, which NK's generally match. They are, however, idiotic primaries. You're pushing for them to essentially make primary NK's. That's silly. But I'm dumb. kk

a gun has much less limits than a sword does. can you swing a sword at something 50m away?

Adding **** is fine, skilled for **** at that. Unnecessary and just plain silly **** is not. For the lulz isn't a valid reason to add things when there's tons of other actually decent things that actually needs to be put into the game.

Godin Thekiller, I find your lack of faith disturbing.
Swords are better than knives and I'm talking about adding more melee weapons, not just swords.
Skilled melee users play better than gun-users

Skill melee users are definitively better killers than coward gun users.Any whom that says its impossible cannot think correctly.

Why would you conceal a sword if you're going on the battle field to kill mercs for money, knives in public but swords in conflict.

Actually, if you are going to attempt to insult someone, particularly on intelligence, you should use proper grammar and punctuation.

I would be happy to hear what I misread or didn't quite grasp however if you are insistent I am the one getting something wrong.

Don't be a hater.
And what pvp do we have?
We kill players.

Sigh:
*repost from ultimate melee board discussion*




Gallente: tower shield/ one handed sword fits with their combat doctrine of preserving combatants life and emphasis on cqc
Caldari: said trifdent because its historically paired with nets, though any pole arm would do. I propose a net/ polearm for 2 reasons; it satisfies the requests on the boards I've seen for a stasis webifier equivalent, and it fits caldari doctrine(in as much as a melee weapon can) by immobilizing the enemy, thus stopping them from closing ranks with(theoretical) gunline allies, and can be used to strand someone out of covers...a sort of advance defense. Also spears have the longest reach of melee weapons traditionally used in warfare.
Minmitar whip: because again it can be used as a snare which harkens to their Savannah hunter heritage, and is more tactically versatile if we give it a drag effect.
Amaran great sword: with av capabilitys really brings home the idea of superiority when you can kick a vehicle...


There this introduces: a new av option, and three new tactics to work into the battlefield.
They are functionally different from knives and hypothetically could help balance commandos if we give them a speed boost now that I think of it...

Why use one tank than than the other.
Why add the combat and rail rifle
Why add new tanks
why add new game modes
why are the Devs adding Warp Gates.

So the Player doesn't get bored of the current stuff.
Even if I have to pay to use them, I would and will because I want to.
I don't spent much money on this game because its all the same.
What I'm saying is you add a gun, gives us more melee.

Agaim why add those two guns and tank, because people wanted them even when they weren't necessary.
Why not Swords,Lances, and a Hammer that sends out Shockwaves when it hits your shield.
Why...

I know who(Meaning more, whom meaning 1) I'm abusing it on.

Similarly reasonable.

Katamari514?

The Amarr version should be a disco ball that shoots lasers.

The Gallente one must be on fire.

The Minmatar one has to be made of steel.

And the Caldari would be..........blue.

1: Shields made to be able to fit reasonably within a shield would be weaker than the shielding within a Scout suit, same for Armor. You can't just simply say "Oh, it'll be better because reasons". That makes zero sense. Also, **** your hi tech shield, my hi tech rifle will shoot straight through it.

2: I don't give a **** about your playstyle, a firearm has consistantly been proven to be VASTLY better than a bladed weapon. This has been proven time and time again, over actual history, and in SEVERAL video games.

3: Riot shield and a sword and shield is two separate things. Don't even try and act as if they are the same thing.

4: You think a melee weapon is more suitable than a rifle. Okay, find a time machine, ask all those slain tribal warriors in Latin/South America and the Sub-Saharan Africa regions and ask them how much better their swords was vs. dem boom sticks.

Someone trying to actally use a full on riot shield (not the mobile ones, I'm talking mil spec combat shields) are eiteher stong as **** or just dumb