|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3156
   |
Posted - 2015.05.04 05:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why should a small turret be made for AV purposes when:
1: LAV's will be ended by anything it tries to shoot at in fairly short order.
2: Everywhere else the turret placements are made to be AI protection
Top lel
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3157
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 19:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Chosokabe Ite wrote:Figures.
If you folks have such grand ideas, voice them in your own damn threads. Don't wait for someone else to bring up a subject for you. It's not like we're competing for who's idea CCP will listen to.
You're in the wrong place if you think that if you make a thread, everyone on the forum will either shut the **** up or suck your **** praising your silliness. Oh, and I'm pretty sure most here, and many others has made threads trying to say how LAV's should be. I've made 11 so far.
Top lel
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3157
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 19:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Chosokabe Ite wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:Chosokabe Ite wrote:Figures.
If you folks have such grand ideas, voice them in your own damn threads. Don't wait for someone else to bring up a subject for you. It's not like we're competing for who's idea CCP will listen to. People will disagree with your assessment. They will say so. There are actual forum rules about crapping the forums up with multiple threads on the same topic. Get over yourself. Don't pull that high horse crap, I have no problem with people disagreeing with me. The problem is there are too many people here struggling to contradict each other.
lel. This one is just amusing.
Top lel
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3161
|
Posted - 2015.05.05 01:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Chosokabe Ite wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:I like your shield idea, but the rest is flawed.
LAVs, along with most other vehicles, are -meant- for teamwork. Granted, they're rarely used that way, but it's intended that there's at least a driver and a gunner: not just a driver jumping seats.
Small railguns are also tricky: you want them to be effective AV, but not capable of easily OHK-ing infantry at any tier. Until you can come up with a way to solve that, they'll just be a hybrid of AV/AI, like plasma cannons are. Sentry Mode kinda depended on the owner's willingness to work with a team. But yeah, I can see how the idea recreates the problem. As for railguns, I dunno, maybe a longer charge time before each shot to balance higher dmg? We don't want to make them more mobile versions of forge guns. Like you said, tricky. I don't mean vehicles are for working WITH a team (everything is for that), I'm saying most vehicles are meant to REQUIRE teamwork. Thus the current *attempt* of making large turrets AV while small turrets are AI, to force HAVs to use teamwork.
I'll ask it again: Why should any small turret be made to be AV in the first place?
Top lel
|
|
|
| |
|