|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
8363
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 09:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mobility and ease of control.
Make small turrets accurate while in motion again.
Honestly were it not for the fact that LAVs are immune to small arms fire I would advocate better fitting options to get more HP. The fact that a jeep is 100% immune to small arms creates an artificial need for AV to be employed 100% of the time in every match, rather than escalation in response to heavy siege vehicle or transport assets.
I also firmly believe that a jeep (27,000 year old technology in new eden) should be cheaper than an ADV dropsuit overall. Power armor should be the big cost utem there. This would put jeeps as an infantry support asset.
So TL;DR make them easier to maneuver, fix the hit detection of small turrets for mobile fire, make them only 50% ressistant to small arms while making them cheaper and giving them more fitting.
There's never enough sh**posting going on, so let's add a few more teaspoons of the guy posting after me to the recipie!
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
8366
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 14:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Chosokabe Ite wrote:Figures.
If you folks have such grand ideas, voice them in your own damn threads. Don't wait for someone else to bring up a subject for you. It's not like we're competing for who's idea CCP will listen to. People will disagree with your assessment. They will say so. There are actual forum rules about crapping the forums up with multiple threads on the same topic.
Get over yourself.
There's never enough sh**posting going on, so let's add a few more teaspoons of the guy posting after me to the recipie!
|
Breakin Stuff
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
8380
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 23:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Chosokabe Ite wrote:
Its when someone tries to hijack a thread so he doesn't have to make one(for whatever reason they have), dismiss everything posted beforehand and try to replace it with what suggestions he thinks "should" be listed in the first place. That's what I'm complaining about. It's like they wait for a certain subject to pop up and try to cram whatever they can think of into it, hoping someone important stumbles upon it.
if it's on-topic it's not a hijack, and I've made a lot of threads along this bent, specifically in the opposite direction, because LAVs naked (no fittings) were entirely too tanky.
Guess what? I reserve the right to present alternative views and solutions to your ideas. I also reserve the right to contradict, break down and rip apart, and/or dismantle any idea presented down to the fundamentals of what makes it up.
You think I'm wrong? Say why.
Again. Get over yourself. Don't post if someone coming in and disagreeing and presenting an alternative view is going to make you get mad and stamp your feet.
There's never enough sh**posting going on, so let's add a few more teaspoons of the guy posting after me to the recipie!
|
|
|
|