| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cody Sietz
Random Gunz
Rise Of Legion.
4497
   |
Posted - 2015.04.20 15:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
We add new sets of districts(or change some of the current ones) and give them the High/low/null sec security status, then depending on which status, only so many people can fight there.
So for high Sec you'd only be allowed 6v6 and but would get lowest rewards
Low sec would be for 10-12vs10-12 with a higher reward then high sec
And null would be our current PC environment(with the older payouts or even slightly higher, but that can be discussed later)
I think this would allow the smaller corps who have a issue fielding a full team yet still allow the larger ones to have a real place in PC. Of course, the battles themselves would have to be fine tuned and adjusted to accommodate the smaller player count but I doubt that would be a problem.
So, thoughts?
"I do agree with you there though. shudders"
-Arkena Wyrnspire
|
Scheneighnay McBob
And the ButtPirates
6100
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 16:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
I like.
However, clone packs are still ridiculously expensive.
Some details can be ignored
|
Dust User
PIanet Express
Smart Deploy
1901
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 16:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:I doubt that would be a problem.
You must be new. |
Ku Shala
PIanet Express
Smart Deploy
1382
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 16:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
how much easier would it be for 6 pros to stomp in high sec?
unfortunately the economics of PC do not accommodate smaller corporations.
Passively gained clone packs based on sp/wp earned so that corps can attack and reattack at least once per month with little to no cost is the only way to get smaller corps into pc. holding their hand will only result in lost districts and huge isk dumps.
poor easily exploited idea back to the drawing board..........
-¦a+ó a+ú-Æa+äla+ä (CK-0 Specialist x5)
Caldari Loyalist
22 230 780 sp in drop suit upgrades
|
Cody Sietz
Random Gunz
Rise Of Legion.
4498
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 16:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ku Shala wrote:how much easier would it be for 6 pros to stomp in high sec?
unfortunately the economics of PC do not accommodate smaller corporations.
Passively gained clone packs based on sp/wp earned so that corps can attack and reattack at least once per month with little to no cost is the only way to get smaller corps into pc. holding their hand will only result in lost districts and huge isk dumps.
poor easily exploited idea back to the drawing board..........
Once a month attacks? Who do think will have enough patience for that?
I also think it will be easier for small groups to field 6 good players then to field 16. We have a small pool of players to choose from and it's nearly impossible for a new fledgling corp to get newbies together and then they get stomped by the best of the best everytime and simply quit PC and or the game.
"I do agree with you there though. shudders"
-Arkena Wyrnspire
|
Cody Sietz
Random Gunz
Rise Of Legion.
4498
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 16:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:I like.
However, clone packs are still ridiculously expensive.
I think once this is established we can adjust clone pack cost and have set lower max clone counts for high and low sec.
"I do agree with you there though. shudders"
-Arkena Wyrnspire
|
Cody Sietz
Random Gunz
Rise Of Legion.
4498
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 16:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dust User wrote:Cody Sietz wrote:I doubt that would be a problem. You must be new.
Point taken, but I still think it will be relatively easy to make a smaller group fight on a domination map or even a skirm with 3 points and even make a new skirm with one less point to fight for.
"I do agree with you there though. shudders"
-Arkena Wyrnspire
|
Fox Gaden
Immortal Guides
Learning Alliance
6316
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 17:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
Forget about security status, just have some smaller districts.
Use the 3 objective maps.
I think 8 vs 8 and 12 vs12 would be more appropriate sizes. 6 vs 6 is just a bit too small.
Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
|
Cody Sietz
Random Gunz
Rise Of Legion.
4498
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 17:46:00 -
[9] - Quote
Fox Gaden wrote:Forget about security status, just have some smaller districts.
Use the 3 objective maps.
I think 8 vs 8 and 12 vs12 would be more appropriate sizes. 6 vs 6 is just a bit too small.
I think your right about 8v8, seems like the the sweet spot.
I think the security status is just a way to tie into Eve lore a little more neatly. Just seems like less paperwork IMO.
"I do agree with you there though. shudders"
-Arkena Wyrnspire
|
Fox Gaden
Immortal Guides
Learning Alliance
6319
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 18:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:Fox Gaden wrote:Forget about security status, just have some smaller districts.
Use the 3 objective maps.
I think 8 vs 8 and 12 vs12 would be more appropriate sizes. 6 vs 6 is just a bit too small. I think your right about 8v8, seems like the the sweet spot. I think the security status is just a way to tie into Eve lore a little more neatly. Just seems like less paperwork IMO.
While it would be convenient to use the High Sec terrestrial planets in Molden Heath for the small districts, so they don't have to change any of the existing districts, we would still need an explanation of why people are being allowed to claim territory by force in High Sec.
Also, our current PC environment is located on planets in Low Sec space (not Null Sec).
I think the best approach is just to ask CEO's to volunteer their districts for downsizing, and then modify a certain number of the districts that have been volunteered. Since most of the districts would remain the standard 16 vs 16, we would only need a few CEO's to volunteer districts to get enough. It might be better if a number of the smaller districts were on the same planets, so small corps could fight each other.
Hand/Eye coordination cannot be taught. For everything else there is the Learning Coalition.
|
Ku Shala
PIanet Express
Smart Deploy
1385
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 18:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
we cant just be handing out 80 million isk out daily now can we at least every corp could be able to experience pc with less risk and it could be implemented into the corporate warbarge,
6, 8, 10, 12 , 16 players doesn't matter bigger corps with more experience and more players will dominate the smaller districts, the smaller you make a match the more competitive it will become. Its harder to elude 16 players than 8. top players will have a bigger advantage only having to worry about 8 guns firing at them.
-¦a+ó a+ú-Æa+äla+ä (CK-0 Specialist x5)
Caldari Loyalist
22 230 780 sp in drop suit upgrades
|
JIMvc2
Consolidated Dust
919
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 19:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
lol
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!! Die YOU SHADOW BEING IN THE DARK!!!
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |