|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18363
   |
Posted - 2015.04.20 01:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Eruditus 920 wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:As we asked IN CLOSED BETA, they're adding Minmatar and Amarr vehicles (HAVs for sure, not sure about the rest) by reskinning Gallente and Caldari vehicles. Bob, let's be very clear, they are NOT "adding Minmatar and Amarr vehicles". If you want to get excited about this, great, but don't make it more than what it is. Sometimes I wonder if everyone here is on CCP's payroll but me. You're right, they're adding variants of Caldari and Gallente vehicles that will perform exactly as an Amarr and Minmatar vehicle would perform, have Amarr and Minmatar slot layouts, Amarr and Minmatar base stats, have the color of an Amarr and Minmatar vehicle, and be named in a fashion that is Amarr and Minmatar. However, because the actual shape of the HAV is not different, they are most definitely nothing like Amarr and Minmatar vehicles would be. 
A hero. Not the hero we deserved but the hero we needed. Nothing less than a knight.
GÇ£That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.GÇ¥
-The Nameless City
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18365
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 02:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Eruditus 920 wrote:I would prefer it be done right, or not at all.
I would prefer CCP to show a little pride for a change.
They tend to always do things half assed, and from reading some of these posts, it's clear why.
The players don't demand any better.
Why do so many two year old bugs persist? Because the players accept it as "oh, it's just CCP".
The 2d Warbarge was only as good as it had to be to get by. Everyone just accepts it.
Look, I don't really care that much anymore. I play DUST to have a little fun.
If everyone really believe we are getting "new" vehicles, then I think that is wonderful.
But don't tell me they are new, and that I am somehow wrong for not falling in line and calling mediocrity excellence.
We did demand better. At thing point I genuinely don't think anyone cares too much about these continuing shenanigans and really can't be bothered getting emotionally invested.
Am I disappointed there are no unique Racial AM/MIN hulls?
Yes more than I'll ever let on, being one of the loudest voices for getting these in the game, but am I willing to look a gift horse in the mouth?
Nope.
GÇ£That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.GÇ¥
-The Nameless City
|
True Adamance
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
18368
|
Posted - 2015.04.20 04:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
Raiden246 wrote:
Proof that morons will expect little from CCP, and allow them to be lazy with adding new features to the game. How hard is it to add a different vehicle design? But of course you'll sit here and act like a RESKIN is some widely acceptable thing for a dev team to do.
What do you propose we do that we haven't already done? You have all the answers don't you?
Petition CCP?
Done that.
Bug them in the IRC Coldfront Chat and Trello Boards?
Get with the times buddy.
Irritate the developers in a near bi-annular basis with a self bumped thread?
C'mon man I've been there and done that.
Whined in threads that have had nothing to do with Vehicles about racial tanks?
Uh....wait let me check my posting history.
What more could you or I hope to do to convince them than they should give up on implementing placeholder tanks, hire on or re-assign a 3d modeller, and programme in new vehicles for a game that is for all intents and purposes not worth their time on a console who's playstation network support might be pulled later this year?
GÇ£That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.GÇ¥
-The Nameless City
|
|
|
| |
|