DUST Search - EvE Online

True Adamance wrote:

CELESTA AUNGM wrote:

I'd like to repeat though,GÇª I wouldn't like to see Console players OWNING, or CHOOSING ATTACKS, or RENAMING, or changing real estate and assets in someone else's game (namely EVE-Online). It just doesn't feel fair for players to invest years of their own effort and cash in a game, and have someone else's separate game start mucking up their possessions WITHOUT direct input and request from them. Something's just not right about doing thatGÇª like a new rule that says a guest can come into your house and start changing walls and shutting off your refrigerator, just because he's a visitor. Ugh

Every change/assault/theft/take-over done by Dust-players really needs to be created only through the wish of an EVE-player who's making this possible as part of her power and her control in HER game.

I can understand that in a sense too.

But EVE pilots have everything in New Eden to play around with except planets......PI really isn't all that immersing. Why should not the planets be our domain to control and fool around with as we wish like space is theirs?

We place our own assets down, choose where we attack, when we attack, how we attack, if they want PI on our planets they need to either agree for us to leave their PI intact, etc.

Universe of good wishes for the 49, especially CCP Eterne... No story can have life without writers and publishers.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
CELESTA AUNGM Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 524	Posted - 2015.04.16 20:29:00 - [1] - Quote Joel II X wrote: Having the orbital artillery actually destroying ships with LOLOHKBBQ Yes, the Orbital Cannon control bags it for me too. Of all the components I saw in those promotional videos, a surprising MANY of them actually became reality in Dust as the development progressed. But that "Cannon" is the grand-prize to fight for on a District. I think it would also make a valid difference between Pub/FW matches and a PC match. I'd like to repeat though,GÇª I wouldn't like to see Console players OWNING, or CHOOSING ATTACKS, or RENAMING, or changing real estate and assets in someone else's game (namely EVE-Online). It just doesn't feel fair for players to invest years of their own effort and cash in a game, and have someone else's separate game start mucking up their possessions WITHOUT direct input and request from them. Something's just not right about doing thatGÇª like a new rule that says a guest can come into your house and start changing walls and shutting off your refrigerator, just because he's a visitor. Every change/assault/theft/take-over done by Dust-players really needs to be created only through the wish of an EVE-player who's making this possible as part of her power and her control in HER game. Universe of good wishes for the 49, especially CCP Eterne... No story can have life without writers and publishers.
CELESTA AUNGM Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation 525	Posted - 2015.04.17 05:38:00 - [2] - Quote True Adamance wrote: CELESTA AUNGM wrote: I'd like to repeat though,GÇª I wouldn't like to see Console players OWNING, or CHOOSING ATTACKS, or RENAMING, or changing real estate and assets in someone else's game (namely EVE-Online). It just doesn't feel fair for players to invest years of their own effort and cash in a game, and have someone else's separate game start mucking up their possessions WITHOUT direct input and request from them. Something's just not right about doing thatGÇª like a new rule that says a guest can come into your house and start changing walls and shutting off your refrigerator, just because he's a visitor. Every change/assault/theft/take-over done by Dust-players really needs to be created only through the wish of an EVE-player who's making this possible as part of her power and her control in HER game. I can understand that in a sense too. But EVE pilots have everything in New Eden to play around with except planets......PI really isn't all that immersing. Why should not the planets be our domain to control and fool around with as we wish like space is theirs? We place our own assets down, choose where we attack, when we attack, how we attack, if they want PI on our planets they need to either agree for us to leave their PI intact, etc. True Adamance, I wouldn't mind allowing that if a portion of the star cluster could be cordoned off for PS3 consolers' use (much like Modlen Heath is kind of IMPLIED as serving that purpose). But I think to EVE-Online capsuleers, "space" as theirs means the planets and asteroids in it. The Starmap seems to define space-ownership and space-contention by tagging planets. So I can't help but imagine that any lock-restriction our planet gameplay puts on their P-v-E gamplay (which I think is the part of EVE players have to pay a monthly subscription to unlock)GÇª will create a game-controversy. And I'm not sure what side of the argument I'd be on, in that case. I'm just not sure what's fair. It would be an interesting thing to see develop though. CCP would be perhaps the first game designer to ever try it. Universe of good wishes for the 49, especially CCP Eterne... No story can have life without writers and publishers.