|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Tebu Gan
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
1353
|
Posted - 2015.04.15 19:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: Then let's set the math aside.
What functional, logical, immersive, or performance gaining reason do you have for having BPO's in PC? What is their functional purpose other than exploiting a defensive move to freely defend a district you know you are going to lose and forcing the enemy to incur ISK losses by doing so? How is that in any way fair for the attackers who have to deal with it?
Are you saying that scorched earth tactics are an exploit? To that sounds like a war of economy. To me, it seems incredibly meta to use cheap/free gear in order to dupe the enemy into incurring more losses than they intended. If I know I'm going to lose a battle, I'm going to make damn sure that I make the guy taking my stuff suffer as much as possible. I think that in of itself, New Eden at its finest. Now don't get me wrong, in the current state of PC with this being the ONLY profitability in a district....it's not a good thing. However pending upcoming changes, I could see it as a valid tactic in winning the ISK war (since innate profitability will be baked into owning a district outside of ISK) Scorched Earth tactics are burning everything as you fall back to prevent the enemy from using it. Scorched Earth tactics are -NOT- letting them have it anyway and giving them a run for their money with absolutely no risk on your end. It'd be cool if it were a choice factor but this is an obvious choice. If I lose the first battle for the district, the second is where I start weighing my options. If I feel it's absolutely necessary to keep the district, I'll fight - otherwise, why bother wasting ISK? It's not a choice, it's a default, and every PC entity -ever- will make that choice; thereby, it's not so much a choice as a "use this tactic always and forever". It's going to get old -real freaggin quick- and, again, I see absolutely no reason why it should be a thing. The entire point of all of this was to offer good fights, wasn't it? Why sacrifice or risk those good fights by giving a mechanic like this when the simple solution is to simply prevent BPO's and APEX suits from being used in PC? Every time I brought up BPOs and APEXs, I heard "we don't have an economy for them to affect". Okay, well, we have player trading. We have asset selling. How far back are we going to move this goal post before we start seriously considering the implications that riskless, lossless assets have on the game? EDIT: Long story short, you're just taking one terrible meta (players giving up early and just letting their enemies have the district) and replacing it with another (fielding BPOs and doing damage with no risk/loss). The only players losing with this new mechanic are the attackers. Well since the primary profitability within PC in Rattatis new design has absolutely nothing to do with ISK at all, that aspect is non-issue. I'm not entirely sure what you're worried about. People using cheap gear? Doesn't that simply encourage the opposing side to use cheaper gear as well? What it does is encourage a sense of "use the bare minimum of what is necessary to win" . If one team is using BPOs, then you should use BPOs as well. Don't have a BPO? Use a standard ISK suits. Worried about losing money that way? You could literally mulch yourself in a PC match, and make all of the money you lost from running standard in a single pub match. The lost profitability from the other team running BPOs is simply not that much compared to them running standard suits and militia modules. Or are you worried you'll need to use proto gear to beat a team using BPOs? Well then you probably shouldn't be in PC. So again, under the new system, this simply allows people to use cheap gear to wear the enemy down if they want to. However since ownership of the district will actually provide benefit that isn't tied to ISK, what you end up with is a system where ISK is the means to fight the battle, but if you want to win, you're going to use the best you have because owning the district is valuable to you. So the moral of the story is, don't use more than you have to, but you might want to up it up a notch to secure the win if you want the true profit, which is in district ownership.
This isn't some pub match, this is the end game meta. If there is one mode where the best of the best is encouraged to be used, this is it. Your idea on what PC should be is just wrong. There should be absolutely no incentive to run cheap gear, yet here it is.
This isn't just some glorified PUB match, where if you are losing, just switch to cheap fits and try to cause what little pain you can. You don't give up until those last few ticks, and even then you usually don't stop. All the while running proto.
This mode is for the elite of dust, go big or go home. Now it's just another PUB match until they come out with their "soon" changes that will make it worth it. Just stupid, they could have brought this change out with other incentives. Nope, overnight, hey guess what guys, you now make even less out of PC cause we NEEDED to fix this exploit priority.
Was it really that important that it need to be done NOW?
Tanks - Balancing Turrets
|
Tebu Gan
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
1353
|
Posted - 2015.04.15 19:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
XxBlazikenxX wrote:Awesome! Especially since I planned to get into PC in a few days time. Be warned, Y.A.M.A.H is coming!
Hah, good luck. You think the top corps are the top corps because of the isk??
You are in for quite the surprise.
Tanks - Balancing Turrets
|
Tebu Gan
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
1353
|
Posted - 2015.04.15 19:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:
If they don't care about the win, they'll use cheap gear and try to dupe you into burning ISK on expensive stuff.
And I think many are missing the fundemental of what PC is. It's not about bringing cheap stuff to make a profit. You aren't hurting anyone by doing that. Sure you might get a larger than normal payout (by LOSING mind you), but what was the point of the battle. This shouldn't be some pub you go afk in.
We bring the best, and always will, and care little for the isk. Sometimes we don't even make a profit off a win. It's not about the isk for most of us, it's about the fight. And by encouraging the use of lesser gear to make a larger profit, there won't be many good fights.
This idea that people get caught up in that PC has been about isk are just crazy. Sure for a select few it was (and we wiped a few of those off the starmap ourselves), but not for all. This sudden change will have more negative affects than it will positive.
Sure it's easy to say chill out when you(and many others) aren't even involved in this mode. This didn't need to happen right this moment. I get that other changes are on the way, but without those changes, the only people that suffer are those that are already heavily invested into PC. And for what reason?????
Yeah, I'm pissed, and others like me have every right to be. This isn't hurting the corps, but the PLAYERS.
Tanks - Balancing Turrets
|
Tebu Gan
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
1368
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 18:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:This thread has achieved BREAKIN STUFF'S COMEDY GOLD SEAL OF APPROVAL
You don't strike me as much of a comedian.
Leave that to the funny people, stick with your data!
Tanks - Balancing Turrets
|
Tebu Gan
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
1368
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 18:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bremen van Equis wrote:Dust User wrote:With the payouts being so low is this CCP's way of telling us they want less proto in PC matches? My guess is that it's CCP's way of telling us they want less proto in pubs... The ISK factories and exploits are going bye-bye, and with lower payouts in PC's the most viable way of making money is grinding it in pubs. Just a supposition...maybe the rich have endless ISK but somehow I think over time it will dry out if mercs keep spamming proto in pubs AND fielding it as a necessity in PCs.
What's wrong with proto in Pubs. Sure before when they faced people without it, but with new matchmaking you usually go against people wearing it or can wear it.
There shouldn't be ANY complaints over proto in Pubs. I spent plenty of time obtaining that, and should be encouraged to use it against others that have it. Be it PUBS or PC. I believe that was a major point they were pointing to when they announced legion.
And besides, there are plenty out there who say that proto gear < skill. So you should probably get gud (according to proponents that advocate the idea gear has a lesser impact on engagements over skill. Ignore the fact that those who have it (proto gear) are probably pretty skilled to start with at that point in their merc life.).
I myself don't agree with that sentiment (skill > gear) when the gear DOES make a noticeable impact, proven by those that hate being proto stomped yet can't afford to run it as consistently as others.
Tanks - Balancing Turrets
|
Tebu Gan
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
1368
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 18:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:Look, there is no justifying the use of BPO's or APEX's in PC.
The entire point of both of those were for players to accumulate ISK - citing we didn't have an economy to screw over - and that's the entire reason for them existing now while looking cool. The looking cool bit is being hashed out with SKINs and we now have player trading and asset selling which is, essentially, a rudimentary economy. We have trade forums now and this only strengthens the argument that the economy is now in play.
I feel like I'm repeating myself with this (maybe because it wasn't properly tackled the last time I brought it up, for whatever reason).
In PC though? They're fundamentally unnecessary. Looking cool? SKINs. Accumulating ISK? You should not be doing this in PC and as Pokey keeps bringing up, profitability isn't in ISK with PC 2.0 (even though he admits that right now it's not in play and the system is derp). I'm -REALLY- having serious doubts as to why BPO's and APEX's should have any role at all in PC other than the inevitable: Weaponized Boredom through lack of good fights, and Cheapskating using an exploited, gamed system of "Keep What You Kill".
So the enemy team wants to use cheap stuff... Who cares right? Well, when the only thing holding them back from attacking your district is the clones to actually assault it than what's to stop them from starting a War of Attrition on you and just burning you out of both ISK and patience? Instead of asking "Why would they use BPOs", ask "Why -WOULDN'T- they use BPOs?"
They can assault you with riskless/lossless BPO's/APEX's as long as they have clones and if you attack them they'll just use all the ISK they've saved up from kicking your hind quarters to field the best gear. If they look like they're losing? They'll just default back to the BPO, give you a run for your money at no cost to them, and then you have more territory than you can feasible defend and they just repeat the process until they get their districts back - but now with a bank of ISK they generated from kicking you while you're down.
Give it time. Once people start realizing that there's no other way to make ISK in PC and PC is fundamentally worthless otherwise until -MAYBE- a tentative June/July release (according to the roadmap Trello) they're just going to default to the easiest option available: BPO's, Attrition, Boredom, and Bull****.
Again, I've seen a lot of justification for why a person would -want- to use them but absolutely no justification as to why they should be in PC for any reason other than exploiting a gamed system.
BPO's need to be in PC because they serve as entry level for new corps to try things out. BPO's combined with warbages producing clones will allow active corps with Command Points, a point of entry into PC. BPO's in PC is no different than using Rookie Ships in sov warfare in eve.
Do rookie ships last long outside of high sec?
Sure, bring your BPO and get stomped. You will NEVER gain a foothold in PC with that logic. Therefore you will never reap any benefits from it aside from a little extra isk in you pocket.
Tanks - Balancing Turrets
|
Tebu Gan
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
1371
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 20:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Bremen van Equis wrote:Tebu Gan wrote:Bremen van Equis wrote:Dust User wrote:With the payouts being so low is this CCP's way of telling us they want less proto in PC matches? My guess is that it's CCP's way of telling us they want less proto in pubs... The ISK factories and exploits are going bye-bye, and with lower payouts in PC's the most viable way of making money is grinding it in pubs. Just a supposition...maybe the rich have endless ISK but somehow I think over time it will dry out if mercs keep spamming proto in pubs AND fielding it as a necessity in PCs. What's wrong with proto in Pubs. Sure before when they faced people without it, but with new matchmaking you usually go against people wearing it or can wear it. There shouldn't be ANY complaints over proto in Pubs. I spent plenty of time obtaining that, and should be encouraged to use it against others that have it. Be it PUBS or PC. I believe that was a major point they were pointing to when they announced legion. And besides, there are plenty out there who say that proto gear < skill. So you should probably get gud (according to proponents that advocate the idea gear has a lesser impact on engagements over skill. Ignore the fact that those who have it (proto gear) are probably pretty skilled to start with at that point in their merc life.). I myself don't agree with that sentiment (skill > gear) when the gear DOES make a noticeable impact, proven by those that hate being proto stomped yet can't afford to run it as consistently as others. Easy, cowboy. Who said proto shouldn't be used in pubs? Lern to reed gudder. I simply think with less ISK floating around, there will be less proto SPAMMING in pubs. As for pubstomping? When the big corps are lolScrubLording at my ground spawn, I spawn MCC in a cloaked myofib suit and punch a few in the back of the head. I lose the suit but I can afford it b/c I don't constantly run it. It's great fun! Maybe I punched you once and you're angry? Let's talk about it. Uz yor werds.
I think you misunderstood me, but no matter.
But tell me this, because you CHOOSE not to use proto gear, you feel it's right that if others do choose to use it, consistently, that they should somehow be punished.
I honestly don't understand this "Proto stomp mentality" with matchmaking in place. They pull proto, and you want to compete on their level, then pull proto. Nuff said.
As far as your idea of ISK, I know a great deal of people that have a boatload of isk, who obtained by grinding pubs with cheap/free fits. This idea floating around that the PC people are rich because they gamed the system is silly. A grand majority of them gained that legit. You honestly can't pretend like everyone that runs proto ever gained it through ill gotten means.
And I do suggest you reread what I said. You assumed I was bashing you, yet I was engaging in civil discourse.
My main point, you should be encouraged to run proto. It's not something reserved for special occasions. I worked hard to get that gear, and I and you should be encouraged to use it all the time. And if you think that the PC change is going to stop the isk flow, just wait until you see trading.
I'll be proto stomping all day everyday my friend, for I have MUCH to sell. And just wait until they open up the trade of aur things like boosters and keys. The isk will flow like a rushing river my friend.
Tanks - Balancing Turrets
|
Tebu Gan
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
1375
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 21:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bremen van Equis wrote:Tebu Gan wrote:
I think you misunderstood me, but no matter.
But tell me this, because you CHOOSE not to use proto gear, you feel it's right that if others do choose to use it, consistently, that they should somehow be punished.
I honestly don't understand this "Proto stomp mentality" with matchmaking in place. They pull proto, and you want to compete on their level, then pull proto. Nuff said.
As far as your idea of ISK, I know a great deal of people that have a boatload of isk, who obtained by grinding pubs with cheap/free fits. This idea floating around that the PC people are rich because they gamed the system is silly. A grand majority of them gained that legit. You honestly can't pretend like everyone that runs proto ever gained it through ill gotten means.
And I do suggest you reread what I said. You assumed I was bashing you, yet I was engaging in civil discourse.
My main point, you should be encouraged to run proto. It's not something reserved for special occasions. I worked hard to get that gear, and I and you should be encouraged to use it all the time. And if you think that the PC change is going to stop the isk flow, just wait until you see trading.
I'll be proto stomping all day everyday my friend, for I have MUCH to sell. And just wait until they open up the trade of aur things like boosters and keys. The isk will flow like a rushing river my friend.
Dear Cowboy, Your "get gud" (in bold, I might add) isn't civil discourse, so get off your high horse (yes, pun on the cowboy thing). Maybe we're just talking past each other because you're butthurt by the changes and you think I'm happy they are "punishing" you with the new mechanics. I made my fortune in pubs as well. It's a small fortune...not nine figures yet, but plenty to keep me entertained and able to run proto as needed. I'm not talking about anyone being punished, guy. I'm just saying...again...that I THINK with less ISK floating around from the old PC mechanics, we will see less proto spamming in pubs. If you feel the new mechanics of PC is punishing you then that is your opinion. I'm just positing a thought about what one of the results might be. Do I think it's a good thing that there may be less proto spamming in pubs? Yes. Absolutely. It will lead to better battles with actual escalation. I enjoy those fights the most. o7 Cowboy!
*Sigh* Please pay special attention the what I put in parentheses. I was making a reference to others that propagate the idea that skill is greater than gear.
And again, how do you imagine trading is going to affect the isk eh?? If anything you will see far more proto floating around.
Tanks - Balancing Turrets
|
|
|
|