|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5838
|
Posted - 2015.04.15 04:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote: Then let's set the math aside.
What functional, logical, immersive, or performance gaining reason do you have for having BPO's in PC? What is their functional purpose other than exploiting a defensive move to freely defend a district you know you are going to lose and forcing the enemy to incur ISK losses by doing so? How is that in any way fair for the attackers who have to deal with it?
Are you saying that scorched earth tactics are an exploit? To that sounds like a war of economy.
To me, it seems incredibly meta to use cheap/free gear in order to dupe the enemy into incurring more losses than they intended. If I know I'm going to lose a battle, I'm going to make damn sure that I make the guy taking my stuff suffer as much as possible. I think that in of itself, New Eden at its finest.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5843
|
Posted - 2015.04.15 18:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: Then let's set the math aside.
What functional, logical, immersive, or performance gaining reason do you have for having BPO's in PC? What is their functional purpose other than exploiting a defensive move to freely defend a district you know you are going to lose and forcing the enemy to incur ISK losses by doing so? How is that in any way fair for the attackers who have to deal with it?
Are you saying that scorched earth tactics are an exploit? To that sounds like a war of economy. To me, it seems incredibly meta to use cheap/free gear in order to dupe the enemy into incurring more losses than they intended. If I know I'm going to lose a battle, I'm going to make damn sure that I make the guy taking my stuff suffer as much as possible. I think that in of itself, New Eden at its finest. Now don't get me wrong, in the current state of PC with this being the ONLY profitability in a district....it's not a good thing. However pending upcoming changes, I could see it as a valid tactic in winning the ISK war (since innate profitability will be baked into owning a district outside of ISK) Scorched Earth tactics are burning everything as you fall back to prevent the enemy from using it. Scorched Earth tactics are -NOT- letting them have it anyway and giving them a run for their money with absolutely no risk on your end. It'd be cool if it were a choice factor but this is an obvious choice. If I lose the first battle for the district, the second is where I start weighing my options. If I feel it's absolutely necessary to keep the district, I'll fight - otherwise, why bother wasting ISK? It's not a choice, it's a default, and every PC entity -ever- will make that choice; thereby, it's not so much a choice as a "use this tactic always and forever". It's going to get old -real freaggin quick- and, again, I see absolutely no reason why it should be a thing. The entire point of all of this was to offer good fights, wasn't it? Why sacrifice or risk those good fights by giving a mechanic like this when the simple solution is to simply prevent BPO's and APEX suits from being used in PC? Every time I brought up BPOs and APEXs, I heard "we don't have an economy for them to affect". Okay, well, we have player trading. We have asset selling. How far back are we going to move this goal post before we start seriously considering the implications that riskless, lossless assets have on the game? EDIT: Long story short, you're just taking one terrible meta (players giving up early and just letting their enemies have the district) and replacing it with another (fielding BPOs and doing damage with no risk/loss). The only players losing with this new mechanic are the attackers.
Well since the primary profitability within PC in Rattatis new design has absolutely nothing to do with ISK at all, that aspect is non-issue.
I'm not entirely sure what you're worried about. People using cheap gear? Doesn't that simply encourage the opposing side to use cheaper gear as well? What it does is encourage a sense of "use the bare minimum of what is necessary to win" . If one team is using BPOs, then you should use BPOs as well. Don't have a BPO? Use a standard ISK suits.
Worried about losing money that way? You could literally mulch yourself in a PC match, and make all of the money you lost from running standard in a single pub match. The lost profitability from the other team running BPOs is simply not that much compared to them running standard suits and militia modules.
Or are you worried you'll need to use proto gear to beat a team using BPOs? Well then you probably shouldn't be in PC.
So again, under the new system, this simply allows people to use cheap gear to wear the enemy down if they want to. However since ownership of the district will actually provide benefit that isn't tied to ISK, what you end up with is a system where ISK is the means to fight the battle, but if you want to win, you're going to use the best you have because owning the district is valuable to you. So the moral of the story is, don't use more than you have to, but you might want to up it up a notch to secure the win if you want the true profit, which is in district ownership.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5843
|
Posted - 2015.04.15 19:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote: This isn't some pub match, this is the end game meta. If there is one mode where the best of the best is encouraged to be used, this is it. Your idea on what PC should be is just wrong. There should be absolutely no incentive to run cheap gear, yet here it is.
This isn't just some glorified PUB match, where if you are losing, just switch to cheap fits and try to cause what little pain you can. You don't give up until those last few ticks, and even then you usually don't stop. All the while running proto.
This mode is for the elite of dust, go big or go home. Now it's just another PUB match until they come out with their "soon" changes that will make it worth it. Just stupid, they could have brought this change out with other incentives. Nope, overnight, hey guess what guys, you now make even less out of PC cause we NEEDED to fix this exploit priority.
Was it really that important that it need to be done NOW?
You misunderstand my point.
Under the planned rework, ISK rewards are not the primary rewards for the game mode. Therefor the type of gear you need to use, should be just slightly better than what the enemy is using. If the enemy wants to win, they're going to use the best they can, and you will do the same. If they don't care about the win, they'll use cheap gear and try to dupe you into burning ISK on expensive stuff. I think that in of itself is part of the meta.
Since the real benefit comes from winning and holding the land, the win is what is important.
Now obviously the redesign isn't in place yet, and as I've stated before I agree with you in that this seems a bit odd and really doesn't work since ISK is the only real profitability right now. So in effect, profitability of PC *in its current form* is pretty messed up. The point I was trying to make, is that I think this sort of thing actually works quite well under the planned system. So does it suck right now? Totally. But really....take a deep breath and calm down. This type of system will likely work in the long run.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5846
|
Posted - 2015.04.15 19:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:
If they don't care about the win, they'll use cheap gear and try to dupe you into burning ISK on expensive stuff.
And I think many are missing the fundemental of what PC is. It's not about bringing cheap stuff to make a profit. You aren't hurting anyone by doing that. Sure you might get a larger than normal payout (by LOSING mind you), but what was the point of the battle. This shouldn't be some pub you go afk in. We bring the best, and always will, and care little for the isk. Sometimes we don't even make a profit off a win. It's not about the isk for most of us, it's about the fight. And by encouraging the use of lesser gear to make a larger profit, there won't be many good fights. This idea that people get caught up in that PC has been about isk are just crazy. Sure for a select few it was (and we wiped a few of those off the starmap ourselves), but not for all. This sudden change will have more negative affects than it will positive. Sure it's easy to say chill out when you(and many others) aren't even involved in this mode. This didn't need to happen right this moment. I get that other changes are on the way, but without those changes, the only people that suffer are those that are already heavily invested into PC. And for what reason????? Yeah, I'm pissed, and others like me have every right to be. This isn't hurting the corps, but the PLAYERS.
I guess I don't see PC as "Must use Proto or it isn't fun" but rather a war of economy. Do you feel that the quality of gameplay in PC would be lessened if everyone ran something less than proto? I guess for me, a gun is a gun, tier just defines how much damage it does but the amount of needed damage also depends on how much defense the dude I'm shooting has.
Now you could make the argument that lower suits have less flexibility and fun because of lack of slots, totally with you on that, which is why I support flatlined slot layouts, that's a different issue entirely.
I guess I don't see it as "encouraging you to use the cheapest gear possible. If ISK isn't the issue, isn't it more an encouragement to use whatever gear is necessary to beat the enemy? And if the enemy really wants to win and take your district, won't they use the best they can?
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5848
|
Posted - 2015.04.15 21:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
nickmunson wrote: you are taking out roles that ccp intended to be played in every game, there is no such thing as a cheap logi suit that would be viable, bpo links why? 15 seconds can not be used tactically . tanks forget about it, so there for av role is gone. theres 3 roles automatically thrown out of pc. its pretty much the same now as an ambush game mode just with an objective.
You do realize that there will be profitability in PC 2.0 besides ISK right? Profitability that can be used to recoup losses from using higher tiered gear in battles.
Silver Strike44 wrote: Would you not define PC as endgame content? I think most would. Endgame content consists of using what assets (skills points) you have amassed in order to be competitive with others or be challenged in another way. Since Dust is a strictly multiplayer game, it the endgame content should be highly competitive and require the highest level of everything (skill and gear) in order to compete.
Then use the highest level gear you can, either your enemy will do the same, or you will crush them.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5851
|
Posted - 2015.04.15 22:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote: Pokey, the more commentary I read from you in tryng to justify this the more utterly divorced from the reality of the topic I realize you are.
We've seen bpo's fielded in PC ever since bpo's were available. "Serious" battles or otherwise.
"Battle to battle earnings" has been by far the best and fairest payment system to date. Paid for performance, direct to the merc. No passive accrual, no active generation reliant on however many different people to get a merc PAID for a battle.
There is NO profitability without isk. ANY other, extra means or ethergoo or w/e ultimately is converted to ISK and every single step in between Fighting and Gettin' Paid is a timewaster, a chance to not be paid properly OR BOTH.
Have you read Rattati's PC 2.0 proposal yet? What are your thoughts on BMKs?
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5859
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 01:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote: 3.No, I do not recall Rattati having posted a PC2.0 document proposal. I am relying on these forums, the official game forums, to have that info but haven't seen it. What has been posted, has been little else than real vague and general concept stuff. Not formal proposals and nothing with a reference to "BMK"s.
Here you go [Source]
In the future make sure you have all of the information before going on an emotionally driven tirade. Its unbecoming.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5859
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 01:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote: 3.No, I do not recall Rattati having posted a PC2.0 document proposal. I am relying on these forums, the official game forums, to have that info but haven't seen it. What has been posted, has been little else than real vague and general concept stuff. Not formal proposals and nothing with a reference to "BMK"s.
Here you go https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2715403
(You might have to copy the URL to the bar, been getting 404 errors lately from links for some reason)
In the future make sure you have all of the information before going on an emotionally driven tirade. Its unbecoming.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5861
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 03:28:00 -
[9] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:el OPERATOR wrote: 3.No, I do not recall Rattati having posted a PC2.0 document proposal. I am relying on these forums, the official game forums, to have that info but haven't seen it. What has been posted, has been little else than real vague and general concept stuff. Not formal proposals and nothing with a reference to "BMK"s.
Here you go https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2715403(You might have to copy the URL to the bar, been getting 404 errors lately from links for some reason) In the future make sure you have all of the information before going on an emotionally driven tirade. Its unbecoming. 404s either way, direct or url copy/pasted. I appreciate your trying to link it, but since it should be stickied nice and large somewhere simply telling me where should be enough.
CCP Rattati wrote:True Adamance wrote: I'm wondering how you all view the CP measure. Would it lead to a more competitive and organic a mercenary economy or a less competitive one.
This is the synopsis. "Don't own something, that you can't defend" From my WIP document: Corporation Members need to Finish Daily Missions, earning Command Points for the Corporation. Any Corporation Actions require Command Points, and thus, the activity of a Corporation is limited by the size of the Corporation and activity of its members. Wealth accumulation is through Active sales of Clones, that are generated on Districts. Wealth can also be generated through Tax income from Corp Members. Corporations will also be able to attack Districts using Clone Packs that only cost Command Points, making money by inflicting more losses on the enemy team than they lose themselves, using the new "Keep what you Kill" ISK reward method. Black Market Kredits are created and distributed equally to all Corporation Members on Clone Sales. BMK's can be used to buy Black Market goods, such as unique BPO's and gear.
Additionally those who applied to the PC think tank received correspondence from Rattati outlining those same details.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5861
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 03:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Soldner VonKuechle wrote:PS, this might be what Pokey was trying to show you. Its in the archives now, meaning itll be in-game somewhere between 2 to 6 weeks. Theres a chart here. EDIT FFS RATATTI fix the link to the damn development discussion archives its called Planetary Conquest Revisited, incase you actually do intend to read it Goddamn children these days.
Actually not the same thing but a good post nonetheless.
And god damn what is wrong with links lately? I thought it was just a one time thing but pretty much all links of the forums lately seem totally messed up...
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
|
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5877
|
Posted - 2015.04.16 05:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
el OPERATOR wrote:Thank You
Ok, now those are nice ideas BUT clearly there isn't a fully finalized and ready to implement set of parameters there. BMK? So, more LP? More rebranding of the same already existing elements as a guise of "new content"? I'm not buying, but whatever.
Long story short, if this is the totality of the info at this time then the assertion that PC payouts should be restructured rigt now is an absolute Farce.
Payouts have been redrawn so that later on they can be added to. Why not have everything ready to go, THEN redraw them? Losers, apparently, can't handle being told and shown that they LOST, and need a feel-good prize. A....scrubaward? Fine. I understand that. But...a Profit ?? Even if you lose, you still win? That's Pub stuff and should stay there.
Inb4 the next yaddayaddaL337piratevikingpubstar, I wouldn't get paid from a loss either. Learn to punch up instead of insisting on dragging down.
Well there is a bit more to it than just those ideas. Numbers and magical things, but not on the forums.
Also I apologize if I was condescending before, I'll admit that thread was well...buried. I just assumed you had signed up for the Think tank since you feel so strongly about PC and thus were in the know.
"That little s**t Pokey..." --CCP Rattati, Biomassed Episode 032
Dust514 // Podcast & Blog
www.biomassed.net
|
|
|
|