Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atlas Donovan
The Immortal Order
63
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 06:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would like to share some ideas that would cause me to spend money on this game and do so happily;
#1. Return of Quafe LAV bpo's
#2. Boosters that weren't timed - because let's be honest, some of us have school and work and significant others and kids and we literally can't play a game all day every day and it's a waste of money, legit.
#3. A new game mode. - I'm tired of Ambush and Domination and the rare times skirmish actually comes up!
#4. Fancy colored variants of already existing weapons
#5. Changes to PC that tied EVE/DUST together more!
Those are some things that would cause me to spend money! I know Dust 514 is a business for CCP and you wish to be in the black instead of in the red! This game is amazing sometimes and total crap other times! I'd be more willing to spend money on this game if you gave me decent things to spend money on!
I realize you CCP guys work very hard and the rat man wants to make the player base happy and I respect you guys and what you are doing and your trello board and am eager for warlords 1.1 but there are some things that would be sensible to do!!
P.S. Have you ever thought about kickstarter? If you said hey, we need some money for legion or to move Dust to ps4, the whole NEW EDEN network would flock to it! Tshirt rewards, exclusive bpo's, whatever else....you would have major profit almost instantly and could up your game to another level!
I wish to see this game succeed! I love it dearly! Rat man, make it so! |
JIMvc2
Consolidated Dust
886
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 06:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
I have the Lav Guristas BPO Caldari aka the Yellow one :)
The Blood saga is reserved for another merc.
I have the Quafe Lav Caldari Bpo, its not for sale but I'm thinking about it :)
(Gê¬n+Ç-´)GèâGöüGÿån+ƒ.pâ+n+ín+ƒ. LASERS BTCH!!!!!! Die YOU SHADOW BEING IN THE DARK!!!
|
GeorgeN76
Senshi Slayers
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 12:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
Don't like how most things in the marketplace store are get it now or almost never again. Make it easily available. I enjoy this game and what they are doing with it so I choose to support them. Spent over $400 so far this year on it. Bring back more bpo's and such so the isk poor such as myself can just buy them. Really kicking myself in the ass for not getting the war profiteer pack when it was available. And yes it would be nice to turn on the boosters when you want to. Build it and they will come...lol
Scouts and Swarms
|
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French
2399
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 12:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Atlas Donovan wrote:
#3. A new game mode. - I'm tired of Ambush and Domination and the rare times skirmish actually comes up!
Dont even bother there bro. It's been my main focus to have an actual conquest mode when skirmish 1.0 was removed and i was a beta tester, then when i was a player and then when i was CPM, and the lack of it is still something i point as a massive flaw with Dust even now that i dont play it anymore.
It's even something we were hinted at like 2 years ago, and the return of skirmish 1.0 at FF13.
Result of all this ? Void. Nothing. Nada. Que dalle
Farming your likes since 2012
|
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1102
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
#2 might happen it seems
#5 , something is in the works I think |
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1102
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
GeorgeN76 wrote:Don't like how most things in the marketplace store are get it now or almost never again. Make it easily available. I enjoy this game and what they are doing with it so I choose to support them. Spent over $400 so far this year on it. Bring back more bpo's and such so the isk poor such as myself can just buy them. I would love to be able to buy skill points too but that would probably set some people over the edge. Battlefield has a shortcut kit so what's the difference? I just don't have the time that others do to play. Really kicking myself in the ass for not getting the war profiteer pack when it was available. And yes it would be nice to turn on the boosters when you want to. Build it and they will come...lol
you can buy SP.. double to triple instant boost after battle , bit expensive bu can be a great boost on those well played games. Boosters are buying SP. SP has been being bought for quite some time. |
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
9155
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Atlas Donovan wrote:
#3. A new game mode. - I'm tired of Ambush and Domination and the rare times skirmish actually comes up!
Dont even bother there bro. It's been my main focus to have an actual conquest mode when skirmish 1.0 was removed and i was a beta tester, then when i was a player and then when i was CPM, and the lack of it is still something i point as a massive flaw with Dust even now that i dont play it anymore. It's even something we were hinted at like 2 years ago, and the return of skirmish 1.0 at FF13. Result of all this ? Void. Nothing. Nada. Que dalle We have a new gamemode coming out next patch: Acquisition. It's similar to domination, but the objective moves around as each side hacks it.
So yeah... don't talk about things you don't know anything about.
@Ripley_Riley
|
reydient
ROGUE RELICS
101
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
OP is spot on. I don't have the time to invest in dust but I do have the income . I am avid supporter of this game and I ( my wife included ) are more than happy to sink money into this game. TBH, I have spent less on gaming since playing dust and I have purchased less horrible games because of my activity in dust. I do fill that at this point they should open the market some to " us" the paying guy's .
Your suggestions are spot on ! |
ANAHEIM Darko
Corrosive Synergy Rise Of Legion.
220
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
I'd spend Aurum on non-militia weapon BPOs.
CalAss Grunt. Former Eve Pilot.
--Cellar Door
|
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French
2400
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:[quote=Atlas Donovan]
#3. A new game mode. - I'm tired of Ambush and Domination and the rare times skirmish actually comes up!
. It's similar to domination,
Nuff said. Please do read before quoting and failing to bash.
Farming your likes since 2012
|
|
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1102
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Ripley Riley wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:[quote=Atlas Donovan]
#3. A new game mode. - I'm tired of Ambush and Domination and the rare times skirmish actually comes up!
. It's similar to domination, Nuff said. Please do read before quoting and failing to bash.
it's still a new game mode, first I have seen of it , so I am a little excited.
It will be a more dynamic domination , and sounds interesting to me
|
GeorgeN76
Senshi Slayers
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Knightshade Belladonna wrote:GeorgeN76 wrote:Don't like how most things in the marketplace store are get it now or almost never again. Make it easily available. I enjoy this game and what they are doing with it so I choose to support them. Spent over $400 so far this year on it. Bring back more bpo's and such so the isk poor such as myself can just buy them. I would love to be able to buy skill points too but that would probably set some people over the edge. Battlefield has a shortcut kit so what's the difference? I just don't have the time that others do to play. Really kicking myself in the ass for not getting the war profiteer pack when it was available. And yes it would be nice to turn on the boosters when you want to. Build it and they will come...lol you can buy SP.. double to triple instant boost after battle , bit expensive bu can be a great boost on those well played games. Boosters are buying SP. SP has been being bought for quite some time.
Yeah but doesn't have that new skill point smell I want to go to the store and buy it.
Scouts and Swarms
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
9157
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 13:51:00 -
[13] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Nuff said. Please do read before quoting and failing to bash. It's a spin on an existing gamemode. Hell, most objective-based gamemodes are based off of King of the Hill. It promotes a different approach to earning a victory than domination; that's all that matters.
Players have been asking for a free-for-all ambush where there are no teams. That would be a different gamemode too. Are you going to **** on that one because it isn't 100% different?
@Ripley_Riley
|
Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance
1996
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Nuff said. Please do read before quoting and failing to bash. It's a spin on an existing gamemode. Hell, most objective-based gamemodes are based off of King of the Hill. It promotes a different approach to earning a victory than domination; that's all that matters. Players have been asking for a free-for-all ambush where there are no teams. That would be a different gamemode too. Are you going to **** on that one because it isn't 100% different?
Laurent is mad because his ideas were wasted by shanghai 1.0 and now feels his relevancy slipping further into obscurity, so he has to reSult top forum bashing like the rest of us.
I literally can not understand how people can survive being so inept.
|
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French
2401
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:05:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Nuff said. Please do read before quoting and failing to bash. It's a spin on an existing gamemode. Hell, most objective-based gamemodes are based off of King of the Hill. It promotes a different approach to earning a victory than domination; that's all that matters. Players have been asking for a free-for-all ambush where there are no teams. That would be a different gamemode too. Are you going to **** on that one because it isn't 100% different?
I dont **** on anything. My only point is, always has been, and will always be that no existing or coming game mode fits Dust's ambition regarding planetary conquest, FW and such. No modes features a situation where you feel you're defending or attacking when it seems only logical when you're the "owner" or the "invader" of a territory.
This acquisition thing sounds to me as interesting as domination was when it was announced. In the mean time, the first ever game mode that Dust ever had is still nowhere to be found and was the most fun ever featured in Dust despite obvious balance issues in its mecanics.
As for the SoonGäóGäóGäóGäóGäóGäó so hyped by devs Conquest Mode.....well.
Be glad with that acquisition thingy mate if that's what you fancy. As for all objective based game modes being based of king of the hill, there's a lot more than to a game mode than its base. Take MAG for instance which featured an actual progression in a battle. Or hell, PS2 which features the same feeling when attacking big outposts. Outposts that actually look like they're meant to be taken and not just big places where you spawn in and rush to grab stuff to shoot at the enemy's MCC and think "why the F did we not set a real defense here ?"
And please avoid the "dont talk about what u know nothing about dude" with me. Chances are i know way more (probably too much) about D514.
Farming your likes since 2012
|
Isa Lucifer
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
186
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:07:00 -
[16] - Quote
I agree with OP totally. I love the game and CCP Shangai 2.0
Amarr Victor
|
Laurent Cazaderon
What The French
2401
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
Soldner VonKuechle wrote:Ripley Riley wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Nuff said. Please do read before quoting and failing to bash. It's a spin on an existing gamemode. Hell, most objective-based gamemodes are based off of King of the Hill. It promotes a different approach to earning a victory than domination; that's all that matters. Players have been asking for a free-for-all ambush where there are no teams. That would be a different gamemode too. Are you going to **** on that one because it isn't 100% different? Laurent is mad because his ideas were wasted by shanghai 1.0 and now feels his relevancy slipping further into obscurity, so he has to reSult top forum bashing like the rest of us.
I'm still mad but this has nothing to do with MY ideas. This whole conquest game mode, skirmish 1.0 thing was a community wide expectation. No wonder people cheered and applaused when it was fakely said skirmish 1.0 would come back at FF13 and after that.
As for my relevancy, i couldnt care less. I play something else now. but got to admit i still keep my eye on D514 as i cant help but hoping it will someday be what most people hoped it could be.
Also, who doesnt like a good forum bashing now and then uh ?
Farming your likes since 2012
|
Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK General Tso's Alliance
1996
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:14:00 -
[18] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote: I play something else now. but got to admit i still keep my eye on D514 as i cant help but hoping it will someday be what most people hoped it could be.
Then don't shiit on those who are genuinely excited by it, and are the reason YOU can keep holding onto this silly thing if "hope"?
Sensible Frenchman wrote:
Also, who doesnt like a good forum bashing now and then uh ?
People who aren't sado-masochists? Certainly they dont read these forums.
I literally can not understand how people can survive being so inept.
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
9157
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:17:00 -
[19] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:I dont **** on anything. My only point is, always has been, and will always be that no existing or coming game mode fits Dust's ambition regarding planetary conquest, FW and such. No modes features a situation where you feel you're defending or attacking when it seems only logical when you're the "owner" or the "invader" of a territory. Dust 514 has a team of, what, 6-ish people now. You are creating gamemodes that would be possible for a team with a full team of artists, 3D modelers, programmers, etc. Adjust your expectations for what can realistically be attained with our current team.
TL;DR - It isn't CCP Shanghai's fault you are asking for Don Perignon when they are on a Korbel budget.
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:This acquisition thing sounds to me as interesting as domination was when it was announced. In the mean time, the first ever game mode that Dust ever had is still nowhere to be found and was the most fun ever featured in Dust despite obvious balance issues in its mechanics.
As for the SoonGäóGäóGäóGäóGäóGäó so hyped by devs Conquest Mode.....well. Please link me the quote from CCP Rattati or Rouge where they hyped a conquest mode. If the current management didn't talk about it, then throw whatever pie-in-the-sky bullshit you think you were "promised" out of the window. It probably won't happen. There is a reason they shitcanned the last CCP Shanghai EP: he was spouting a bunch of features and possibilities that are unattainable for Dust 514 (PS3).
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Be glad with that acquisition thingy mate if that's what you fancy. As for all objective based game modes being based of king of the hill, there's a lot more than to a game mode than its base. Take MAG for instance which featured an actual progression in a battle. Or hell, PS2 which features the same feeling when attacking big outposts. Outposts that actually look like they're meant to be taken and not just big places where you spawn in and rush to grab stuff to shoot at the enemy's MCC and think "why the F did we not set a real defense here ?" MAG is dead.
Also, PS2 is on PC and PS4, two vastly better platforms. The PS3's hardware is ****; that and the small dev team are choking us out right now.
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:And please avoid the "don't talk about what u know nothing about dude" with me. Chances are i know way more (probably too much) about D514. I forum warrior pretty hard. I may not have every single detail of Dust's pre-beta history, but that doesn't even matter now anyway. As I stated above, the new management has tossed all the old "promises" aside and is developing Dust 514 with a realistic set of goals in mind. Dust's past is not as relevant as Dust's present and near-future.
@Ripley_Riley
|
Travis Stanush
GunFall Mobilization
468
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:24:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:Laurent Cazaderon wrote:I dont **** on anything. My only point is, always has been, and will always be that no existing or coming game mode fits Dust's ambition regarding planetary conquest, FW and such. No modes features a situation where you feel you're defending or attacking when it seems only logical when you're the "owner" or the "invader" of a territory. Dust 514 has a team of, what, 6-ish people now. You are creating gamemodes that would be possible for a team with a full team of artists, 3D modelers, programmers, etc. Adjust your expectations for what can realistically be attained with our current team. TL;DR - It isn't CCP Shanghai's fault you are asking for Don Perignon when they are on a Korbel budget. Laurent Cazaderon wrote:This acquisition thing sounds to me as interesting as domination was when it was announced. In the mean time, the first ever game mode that Dust ever had is still nowhere to be found and was the most fun ever featured in Dust despite obvious balance issues in its mechanics.
As for the SoonGäóGäóGäóGäóGäóGäó so hyped by devs Conquest Mode.....well. Please link me the quote from CCP Rattati or Rouge where they hyped a conquest mode. If the current management didn't talk about it, then throw whatever pie-in-the-sky bullshit you think you were "promised" out of the window. It probably won't happen. There is a reason they shitcanned the last CCP Shanghai EP: he was spouting a bunch of features and possibilities that are unattainable for Dust 514 (PS3). Laurent Cazaderon wrote:Be glad with that acquisition thingy mate if that's what you fancy. As for all objective based game modes being based of king of the hill, there's a lot more than to a game mode than its base. Take MAG for instance which featured an actual progression in a battle. Or hell, PS2 which features the same feeling when attacking big outposts. Outposts that actually look like they're meant to be taken and not just big places where you spawn in and rush to grab stuff to shoot at the enemy's MCC and think "why the F did we not set a real defense here ?" MAG is dead. Also, PS2 is on PC and PS4, two vastly better platforms. The PS3's hardware is ****; that and the small dev team are choking us out right now. Laurent Cazaderon wrote:And please avoid the "don't talk about what u know nothing about dude" with me. Chances are i know way more (probably too much) about D514. I forum warrior pretty hard. I may not have every single detail of Dust's pre-beta history, but that doesn't even matter now anyway. As I stated above, the new management has tossed all the old "promises" aside and is developing Dust 514 with a realistic set of goals in mind. Dust's past is not as relevant as Dust's present and near-future.
Damn Rip don't stuff the Calzone too much...
No I will not show you where they touched me!!!
|
|
james rains
OUTCAST MERCS General Tso's Alliance
18
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
Acquisition sounds like an interesting gamemode. Keeping mercenaries on their feet and moving about, also instead of the objective being in one position for the match it would be constantly changing and opening for different sides of attack. |
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
9161
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:34:00 -
[22] - Quote
james rains wrote: Acquisition sounds like an interesting gamemode. Keeping mercenaries on their feet and moving about, also instead of the objective being in one position for the match it would be constantly changing and opening for different sides of attack. I should think so. The emphasis will be less on logi + sentinel "Hold the line" style gameplay and more on the mobile scout + assault playstyles.
I'm excited for it.
@Ripley_Riley
|
JJ'S
Krusual Covert Operators Minmatar Republic
81
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:36:00 -
[23] - Quote
CCP is basing their development "Things to do list" based on random opinions in mass on the forums...
We should of had a survey sent out to emails that gave us some kind of item reward in game if you filled it out..
This survey should of went into detail about what features your looking for...
What would you see worth investing a few dollars into DUST every month..
What first got you into this IP..
What keeps you playing..
Etc...
The lack of data CCP has currently that they are then basing their development decisions on... Is laughable.. Specially for a company that largely runs off data...
CCP Shanghai is pretty much an advertisement for how bad CCP is getting as a whole. |
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
9162
|
Posted - 2015.04.14 14:48:00 -
[24] - Quote
JJ'S wrote:CCP is basing their development "Things to do list" based on random opinions in mass on the forums...
We should of had a survey sent out to emails that gave us some kind of item reward in game if you filled it out..
This survey should of went into detail about what features your looking for...
What would you see worth investing a few dollars into DUST every month..
What first got you into this IP..
What keeps you playing..
Etc...
The lack of data CCP has currently that they are then basing their development decisions on... Is laughable.. Specially for a company that largely runs off data...
CCP Shanghai is pretty much an advertisement for how bad CCP is getting as a whole. Customer surveys done in-house are usually riddled with errors and generate little useful data. Typically, a company would hire a third party to create and conduct a survey for them that guaranteed quality data. Dust 514 is not exactly being budgeted a ton of money right now so I doubt that will happen.
Also, lol @ customer opinion being used as objective measurement.
@Ripley_Riley
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |