No one is crying dude. Simply pointing out the obvious.

I have better solution: Buff the other guns. Arent there enough pea shooters in dust?

Except this sentence.
ScR isn't very popular compared to other rifles. Same goes for number of ScR users per battle. It's never more than few for both teams.

hmm so u people think except those fine people supporting me a CARTHIUM assault scrambler can take out a gal gk.0 FROM 27meter range in a cqc ? almost instantaneously thats bull **** u guys must have skill up ino the scr a lot so you are scared if they nerf it again yu need grind to gain sp for another weapon :3

It is not OP.
That's like being allergic to peanut butter, then wonder why the f**k you stop breathing when you eat a pb&j sammich ._.

You might be confused.
Carthum = full auto
Viziam = semi auto
Majority of the complaints come from the viziam.

The weapon itself isn't OP. It's the fact that it can be abused with a Turbo controller. It also performs far too well outside of its intended role.

It needs to be adjusted to not work so well from close range and somehow stop the turbo controller abuse.

The AScR is over performing too well, it's simply an easy mode of the tactical variant. It's damage needs to be toned down.

It's armor damage profiles need to be changed or something else at least, I've been killed in mere moments by both the viziam and carthum with 600 armor and getting shot with 50-70+ damage per shot from a viziam and just a stream of continued damage of about 10-25 damage from a carthum

What if it was a +10/-15(or -20) profile

the scram rifles main issues is

A: its high base damage means its -20% to armour still wont affect its ttk too much since it really isn't losing too much damage. ifn the profile was -30 or 35% THEN it would be noticble and struggle to melt armour. could be applied to the base variant......we all hate how stong that charged shot is even without damage mods. the assault variant really only needs its base damage nerfed down.

B: the turbo controller....................enough said

C: feed back damge of 25..............could be higher................it gets all this damage......short over heat time.. compare to the laser: 125 feedback....LONG cooldown even with lvl 5 operation. increase feedback to 75-90 damage to punish for over heat...and anoy turbo users. slightly increase overheat time. (prevent's....hinders...makes bad choice for cqc)



D: the charged shot damage......................this is way too high. should have higher heat cost. to make it more risk/reward for landing the hit. prevents single round spam from lasting too long.

E: clip size feels slightly too big, heat built per shot also feels to low compared to how many rounds/accumulated damage can be applied.

F: shield suits using the scram rifle...............really.....

I could go on but I feel these are its main issues.

tactical long range rifle dominates in CQC, Georgia doesnt even begin to realize that this is a problem in his post implying that the scrambler is fine, Georgia doesnt even begin to realize that is also dominates at long ranges, making it the best rifle weapon at any range, and against any target, even armor ones, unless youre talking about a tanked out heavy with a logi hugging his butt.

think it does a tad bit to much to armor . it should be reaally the opposite of the cr . take off the charge shot and it would fine .