Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Phosis Norg
Mad Clone Posse
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.07 16:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would like to suggest that just because you get overwhelmed by a specific technology, in a match or group of matches, DOES NOT MEAN that this technology should be removed from the mode. It means that players have to adapt. It does not mean imbalance, it means change of view point, change of tactics.
For instance, at one time, the heavies were being killed by Douvolle TAC AR's. The complaining was huge and CCP nerfed the TAC ARs. Now the TAC ARs are worthless (and expensive for noobs to find out they are of no use).
Then, players began spamming tanks and were over running infantry, but then drop ship pilots figured out the tactic of how to stack ROF and began thinning out tanks so that infantry had a chance, but then tankers complained and now drop ships are almost worthless. The tankers could have learned (and some did) how to ditch and hide from drop ships.
Some heavies figured out that they could zoom up in an LAV and commit an execution and zoom on to another location. I hated it, but I started getting AV grenades for defense. But due to whiners, instead of changing tactics, now LAVs are almost worthless and have been eliminated from Ambush all together.
I believe the absence of vehicles in Ambush has made it just plain boring.
Why take out every vehicle from Ambush? You made the LAV weak, isn't that enough? Vehicles add so much to the surprise factor that keeps the game entertaining. Enemies can arrive on the opposite side of the field rather quickly, and sometimes they are like the cavalry coming to the aid of team mates who are pinned down.
The 'two vehicle per team' limit was already an extreme action, but then the complete elimination of vehicles from Ambush has made it the most boring mode to play (IMHO).
I would like to suggest that you put LAVs back into Ambush. If you don't like tankers, and drop ships, so be it, but don't take away all forms of transportation from Ambush.
I strongly suggest that you could have unlimited LAVs in Ambush and it would not create an imbalance. In fact, now that you made LAVs weak and worthless, the AV guys would have a party in Ambush with the guys that drop LAVs. But at least vehicle activity could continue in somewhat open use. The LAV droppers won't know when they will face heavy AV opposition, but at least there is hope for the guy that has to walk his butt from across the map to where the action is. |
Atlas Donovan
The Immortal Order
57
|
Posted - 2015.04.07 16:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
No. |
danthrax martin
Butcher's Nails
338
|
Posted - 2015.04.07 17:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vehicles being gone from bush is cool.
I think they should remove scans from bush next.
Suicidal A/V Moron
Future Corporate Raider
80+mil SP
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3689
|
Posted - 2015.04.07 17:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
LAVs in Ambush? What's wrong with running? I can think of all kinds of arguments against murder taxis being reintroduced.
There are plenty of things wrong with Ambush, and IMO introducing LAVs into them solves none of them.
I vote: NO! |
Derpty Derp
Dead Man's Game
1018
|
Posted - 2015.04.07 17:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Phosis Norg wrote:For instance, at one time, the heavies were being killed by Douvolle TAC AR's. The complaining was huge and CCP nerfed the TAC ARs. Now the TAC ARs are worthless (and expensive for noobs to find out they are of no use) TacAR is the best AR... So I severely doubt your opinion on other things. |
CommanderBolt
KILL-EM-QUICK Rise Of Legion.
3310
|
Posted - 2015.04.07 18:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tac AR is bad is it? I fear that thing! That, scrambler charged shots, bolt pistols.... they all mess up my speedy fits with low tank. Then there is splash damage.... oh god.
Guys stick to using shooty shooty machinegun sticks and shooty-shooty-shooty barrels. Please?
Vitantur Nothus wrote: Why hide a solution under frothy pile of derpa?
SCV Ready!
|
Bremen van Equis
Incorruptibles
316
|
Posted - 2015.04.07 19:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
I think he's just trying to get peeps to stop using the Tac AR.
Buckle up, boysGǪthis ramp leads to space. -Axe Cop
|
Reign Omega
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K
1385
|
Posted - 2015.04.07 22:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
So this is essentially an anti tac thread?
Amirite?
But seriously I hate that they removed Vehicles from OMS, defeats the point of the mode and now its horrendous to deal with installations...
Mark a$$ tricks, and bags of dicks....
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy Rise Of Legion.
3314
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 00:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
Stopped tanking you seriously when you said (m)TAC was useless...
(t)roll harder next time.
Plasma Cannon :3
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
Mortishai Belmont
G.L.O.R.Y General Tso's Alliance
706
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 00:07:00 -
[10] - Quote
I say screw your idea and keep tanks out of ambush.
You get in a game against two proto tanks and your side decides it would be more efficient to call in a couple of LAV's.
The fact is there should be mode without vehicles. Now if I could choose to go into an OMS or a regular ambush, I might agree with you, so I could have the choice of getting rhaped by a tank or not.
You and the four other guys can play by yourselves in a 80 clone ambush with tanks, while the rest of us spam those 50 clones matches, I'm all for that ~(._.~)
The new C.EO. of G.L.O.R.Y,
(~..)~ Now on Youtube ~(..~)
|
|
VALCORE72
Vengeance Unbound RUST415
272
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 00:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
1 word . ........ HELL NO ........... and stfu lol this guy likes to run ppl over and/or hit and run i bet
asian haters united lol .
|
Mobius Wyvern
Sky-FIRE
5933
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 00:21:00 -
[12] - Quote
How about we just stop spending any time on Team-Deathmatch modes?
They're pointless and boring to begin with.
I support Keshava for Gallente Specialist HAV
R.I.P. Kesha
|
Lupus Wolf
Minmatar Republic
220
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 00:37:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:How about we just stop spending any time on Team-Deathmatch modes?
They're pointless and boring to begin with. ^ TDM is for shooty-shoot people. I rarely played ambush in the first place so as a pilot, Idgaf. The spawn system is terribad, too.
Redundant Usernames FTW
Join the Herd
Born to fly!
30% Logi, 20% Tanker, 50% DerpS Pilot
|
Mejt0
Dead Man's Game RUST415
1212
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 00:41:00 -
[14] - Quote
I'll tell you something.
90% of ambush 'slayers' have struggles to destroy a LAV. That's why you have infantry only ambush.
Caldari Loyalist
thecreaturehub fan
Mejt0 Sale List
|
Reign Omega
T.H.I.R.D R.O.C.K
1387
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 05:48:00 -
[15] - Quote
Hey you! Vehicle specialist with no infantry sp! There is absolutely no way for you to play a few quick games! You have to play a 30 min skirm or dom! I don't have all day like that to play, plus I only get time for 1 or 2 with my alt. I had to spec him into infantry to even be able to profit in quick ambush. Not that there are many full vehicle specialist, but you're denying the ability to play for those few. They should have just separated oms.
Mark a$$ tricks, and bags of dicks....
|
Dreis ShadowWeaver
Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback
2611
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 07:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Phosis Norg wrote:Now LAVs are almost worthless and have been eliminated from Ambush all together. LAVs were never used for anything more than cheap transport anyway, so this isn't new.
When was the last time you saw a LAV gunner get a kill?
In fact, when was the last time you even saw a driver-gunner combo attempting to use an LAV to get an advantage??
Creator of the 'Nova Knifers United' channel
Caldari blood, Minmatar heart <3
I'm a monster
|
pegasis prime
BIG BAD W0LVES
2049
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 08:31:00 -
[17] - Quote
danthrax martin wrote:Vehicles being gone from bush is cool.
I think they should remove scans from bush next.
God I hope this is a troll. ..... if not wow ... just ******* wow.
Proud Caldari purist . Rank 10 colonel omiwarrior.
I fought and bled for the State on Caldari prime.
|
The KTM DuKe
Dead Man's Game RUST415
76
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 08:40:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mejt0 wrote:I'll tell you something.
90% of ambush 'slayers' have struggles to destroy a LAV. That's why you have infantry only ambush. I love this guy xD
Alt of H0riz0n Unlimit, DMG director, FOTM chaser
|
rasputin900000
Subsonic Synthesis
33
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 09:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Phosis Norg wrote:Now LAVs are almost worthless and have been eliminated from Ambush all together. LAVs were never used for anything more than cheap transport anyway, so this isn't new. When was the last time you saw a LAV gunner get a kill? In fact, when was the last time you even saw a driver-gunner combo attempting to use an LAV to get an advantage??
Just before the nerf on both accounts. Still don't want them in bush best thing they've done for the game since removing the logi lav. Which were a good idea they were just misused as a muder taxi. As a heavy I'd much rather had one hooked to my squad or my tanker as running people down but they were rarely ever used for their true purpose so bye bye logi lav. That's apparently what happened with ambush too many tank squads 4 tanks and 2 snipers shooting av players thank duna for it . Lol. When new guys come to the game what chance did they have against 1 tank with starter swarms? 0%. Much less 2 or 3 that dropped them into negative percentile. And that was before the proto tanks we have now imagine trying to get enough of the 16 people you get on a team to av 3 of them while 13 others are shooting at you. If it wasn't a tank blasting you it will be one or more of the 13 either way it's a lost match and they just keep spamming the same thing all day long, then there would eventually be nobody playing ambush at all which is almost what happened. |
Krixus Flux
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
579
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 10:43:00 -
[20] - Quote
Dude, the nerd brotherhood here is strong. If they want tanks out, the rat will make it so. It would take one of their kind (think boy scouts but with more Big Bang Theory characters) to sympathize with you and maybe consider.
Until then, sorry bro.
Saying what's on people's minds
|
|
Cypher Nil
Fireteam Tempest
199
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 11:49:00 -
[21] - Quote
Phosis Norg wrote:I would like to suggest that just because you get overwhelmed by a specific technology, in a match or group of matches, DOES NOT MEAN that this technology should be removed from the mode. It means that players have to adapt. It does not mean imbalance, it means change of view point, change of tactics.
For instance, at one time, the heavies were being killed by Douvolle TAC AR's. The complaining was huge and CCP nerfed the TAC ARs. Now the TAC ARs are worthless (and expensive for noobs to find out they are of no use).
Then, players began spamming tanks and were over running infantry, but then drop ship pilots figured out the tactic of how to stack ROF and began thinning out tanks so that infantry had a chance, but then tankers complained and now drop ships are almost worthless. The tankers could have learned (and some did) how to ditch and hide from drop ships.
Some heavies figured out that they could zoom up in an LAV and commit an execution and zoom on to another location. I hated it, but I started getting AV grenades for defense. But due to whiners, instead of changing tactics, now LAVs are almost worthless and have been eliminated from Ambush all together.
I believe the absence of vehicles in Ambush has made it just plain boring.
Why take out every vehicle from Ambush? You made the LAV weak, isn't that enough? Vehicles add so much to the surprise factor that keeps the game entertaining. Enemies can arrive on the opposite side of the field rather quickly, and sometimes they are like the cavalry coming to the aid of team mates who are pinned down.
The 'two vehicle per team' limit was already an extreme action, but then the complete elimination of vehicles from Ambush has made it the most boring mode to play (IMHO).
I would like to suggest that you put LAVs back into Ambush. If you don't like tankers, and drop ships, so be it, but don't take away all forms of transportation from Ambush.
I strongly suggest that you could have unlimited LAVs in Ambush and it would not create an imbalance. In fact, now that you made LAVs weak and worthless, the AV guys would have a party in Ambush with the guys that drop LAVs. But at least vehicle activity could continue in somewhat open use. The LAV droppers won't know when they will face heavy AV opposition, but at least there is hope for the guy that has to walk his butt from across the map to where the action is.
Its a team based clone count killing mode. when you play a tank in any other mode you don't auto win the game because a tank can't capture a point. it influences the battle in a large way and the enemy team adapt by switching out to AV
In ambush it DOES win you the game because you take a large lead over the enemy team, it also takes FAR TOO LONG to adapt to the tank and switch out to AV, once the tank has given your team a 10-15 kill lead AND control of space on the battlefield the damage is done. there is NO WAY to come back from that.
So no, we dont want tanks back in ambush, it doesn't fit the spirit of the mode. now go play another mode if you enjoy tanks so much.
n++pâçGòÉS+Ç +24 Million SP Merc n++pâçGòÉS+Ç
Gû¼Gû¼+¦GòÉGòÉGòÉn¦ñ Caldari Loyalist Gû¼Gû¼+¦GòÉGòÉGòÉn¦ñ
Of course we won, now when do I get paid?
|
Mejt0
Dead Man's Game RUST415
1215
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 11:58:00 -
[22] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Phosis Norg wrote:Now LAVs are almost worthless and have been eliminated from Ambush all together. LAVs were never used for anything more than cheap transport anyway, so this isn't new. When was the last time you saw a LAV gunner get a kill? In fact, when was the last time you even saw a driver-gunner combo attempting to use an LAV to get an advantage??
Really? Before nerfs LAV + small rail combo was great. I can point out [myself included] players that could easily go 25+ kills using a LAV.
Caldari Loyalist
thecreaturehub fan
Mejt0 Sale List
|
Phosis Norg
Mad Clone Posse
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 21:15:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mortishai Belmont wrote:I say screw your idea and keep tanks out of ambush.
You get in a game against two proto tanks and your side decides it would be more efficient to call in a couple of LAV's.
The fact is there should be mode without vehicles. Now if I could choose to go into an OMS or a regular ambush, I might agree with you, so I could have the choice of getting rhaped by a tank or not.
You and the four other guys can play by yourselves in a 80 clone ambush with tanks, while the rest of us spam those 50 clones matches, I'm all for that ~(._.~)
It's an interesting response to me saying that we should have LAV's in Ambush. I did not suggest tanks. |
Phosis Norg
Mad Clone Posse
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 21:17:00 -
[24] - Quote
Cypher Nil wrote:Phosis Norg wrote:I would like to suggest that just because you get overwhelmed by a specific technology, in a match or group of matches, DOES NOT MEAN that this technology should be removed from the mode. It means that players have to adapt. It does not mean imbalance, it means change of view point, change of tactics.
For instance, at one time, the heavies were being killed by Douvolle TAC AR's. The complaining was huge and CCP nerfed the TAC ARs. Now the TAC ARs are worthless (and expensive for noobs to find out they are of no use).
Then, players began spamming tanks and were over running infantry, but then drop ship pilots figured out the tactic of how to stack ROF and began thinning out tanks so that infantry had a chance, but then tankers complained and now drop ships are almost worthless. The tankers could have learned (and some did) how to ditch and hide from drop ships.
Some heavies figured out that they could zoom up in an LAV and commit an execution and zoom on to another location. I hated it, but I started getting AV grenades for defense. But due to whiners, instead of changing tactics, now LAVs are almost worthless and have been eliminated from Ambush all together.
I believe the absence of vehicles in Ambush has made it just plain boring.
Why take out every vehicle from Ambush? You made the LAV weak, isn't that enough? Vehicles add so much to the surprise factor that keeps the game entertaining. Enemies can arrive on the opposite side of the field rather quickly, and sometimes they are like the cavalry coming to the aid of team mates who are pinned down.
The 'two vehicle per team' limit was already an extreme action, but then the complete elimination of vehicles from Ambush has made it the most boring mode to play (IMHO).
I would like to suggest that you put LAVs back into Ambush. If you don't like tankers, and drop ships, so be it, but don't take away all forms of transportation from Ambush.
I strongly suggest that you could have unlimited LAVs in Ambush and it would not create an imbalance. In fact, now that you made LAVs weak and worthless, the AV guys would have a party in Ambush with the guys that drop LAVs. But at least vehicle activity could continue in somewhat open use. The LAV droppers won't know when they will face heavy AV opposition, but at least there is hope for the guy that has to walk his butt from across the map to where the action is. Its a team based clone count killing mode. when you play a tank in any other mode you don't auto win the game because a tank can't capture a point. it influences the battle in a large way and the enemy team adapt by switching out to AV In ambush it DOES win you the game because you take a large lead over the enemy team, it also takes FAR TOO LONG to adapt to the tank and switch out to AV, once the tank has given your team a 10-15 kill lead AND control of space on the battlefield the damage is done. there is NO WAY to come back from that. So no, we dont want tanks back in ambush, it doesn't fit the spirit of the mode. now go play another mode if you enjoy tanks so much.
Wow, somehow everybody thought I said you should have Tanks in Ambush. However, I said we should have LAVs re-introduced.
|
Dreis ShadowWeaver
Negative-Feedback. Negative-Feedback
2624
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 21:48:00 -
[25] - Quote
Mejt0 wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Phosis Norg wrote:Now LAVs are almost worthless and have been eliminated from Ambush all together. LAVs were never used for anything more than cheap transport anyway, so this isn't new. When was the last time you saw a LAV gunner get a kill? In fact, when was the last time you even saw a driver-gunner combo attempting to use an LAV to get an advantage?? Really? Before nerfs LAV + small rail combo was great. I can point out [myself included] players that could easily go 25+ kills using a LAV. Really? That's news to me.
Creator of the 'Nova Knifers United' channel
Caldari blood, Minmatar heart <3
I'm a monster
|
DUST Fiend
16274
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 21:50:00 -
[26] - Quote
The C.O.D. crowd needed a home too, and they got it.
Contests, Sales, Writing etc
Fly Safe
|
Phosis Norg
Mad Clone Posse
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.08 23:59:00 -
[27] - Quote
Derpty Derp wrote:Phosis Norg wrote:For instance, at one time, the heavies were being killed by Douvolle TAC AR's. The complaining was huge and CCP nerfed the TAC ARs. Now the TAC ARs are worthless (and expensive for noobs to find out they are of no use) TacAR is the best AR... So I severely doubt your opinion on other things.
In the past 2 years, I know of one time I got killed by a TAC AR since the nerf. I play almost every day, and probably 5-10 battles a day. That's a lot of play to be hit by a lot of weapons. I'm not sure, but maybe you are playing on a different server where TAC ARs face softer suits or something. |
Phosis Norg
Mad Clone Posse
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.09 00:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:Tac AR is bad is it? I fear that thing! That, scrambler charged shots, bolt pistols.... they all mess up my speedy fits with low tank. Then there is splash damage.... oh god. Guys stick to using shooty shooty machinegun sticks and shooty-shooty-shooty barrels. Please?
I have been killed by a Douvolle TAC AR once in two years since the nerf. I play a lot, and almost every day. So unless there is some alternate server where people where squishy suits, I am sure the stats will bear out that Dui TAC ARs are crap since the nerfing of 2 years ago. |
Phosis Norg
Mad Clone Posse
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.09 00:02:00 -
[29] - Quote
Bremen van Equis wrote:I think he's just trying to get peeps to stop using the Tac AR.
|
Phosis Norg
Mad Clone Posse
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.09 00:06:00 -
[30] - Quote
LUGMOS wrote:Stopped tanking you seriously when you said (m)TAC was useless...
(t)roll harder next time.
I don't know about you, but I have been killed once by a Douvolle TAC AR in the past 2 years since the nerfing. I am sure the stats will bear it out that since the nerfing, they are crap. You aren't the only person to argue my point on this. But I play a lot, and I keep track of what is killing me. I was partial to the Douvolle TAC when they nerfed it, so I do pay attention, and I know of only one kill in since the nerfing 2 years ago... for me anyway.
|
|
Phosis Norg
Mad Clone Posse
24
|
Posted - 2015.04.09 00:10:00 -
[31] - Quote
Mejt0 wrote:I'll tell you something.
90% of ambush 'slayers' have struggles to destroy a LAV. That's why you have infantry only ambush.
But at the same time as CCP banned them from Ambush, they reduced the LAV's protection by 40%. So my point is, why do both? If you think the LAV is too OP, then nerf it, like you did, but don't eliminate it too. Anyway, I'm kind of not happy because that IS the way CCP responds to complaints. It's good that they respond, but they seem to always do multiple fixes instead of slight corrections and waiting to see what the corrections do. Like nerfing the ROF on drop ships AND making AV stronger, faster, longer range. If you don't like drop ships, then nerf them, period, don't jump overboard and make the AV stronger too, do one or the other, not both! Make LAVs weaker, fine, but don't eliminate them too.
|
Derpty Derp
Dead Man's Game
1036
|
Posted - 2015.04.09 16:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: When was the last time you saw a LAV gunner get a kill?
I see this on a semi-regular basis... Saga-II is still viable with a rail... Still do-able with a blaster (but near suicidal)... Missiles, just kinda pointless if you're not above something. |
Lupus Wolf
Minmatar Republic
222
|
Posted - 2015.04.09 23:58:00 -
[33] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Mejt0 wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Phosis Norg wrote:Now LAVs are almost worthless and have been eliminated from Ambush all together. LAVs were never used for anything more than cheap transport anyway, so this isn't new. When was the last time you saw a LAV gunner get a kill? In fact, when was the last time you even saw a driver-gunner combo attempting to use an LAV to get an advantage?? Really? Before nerfs LAV + small rail combo was great. I can point out [myself included] players that could easily go 25+ kills using a LAV. Really? That's news to me. It requires teamwork. LAV as Light Assault Vehicles were good, but rarely used. Though I did notice their numbers start to increase like a month before the nerf. Now they're back to being rare.
"Dogfighting with missiles is like watching two armless kids try to catch a baseball." - Dust Fiend
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |