Is it the sheer eHP in and of itself, or is it the fact that they can do it every thirty seconds (or whatever)?

Would current eHP levels be acceptable if they were coupled with a speed/acceleration nerf, and a change to hardeners making them not the be-all and end-all of HAVs?


Essentially, what I'm proposing is this: cut hardener bonuses and increase raw HP and plates/extenders to keep in line with the eHP loss, and cut speed and acceleration by... let's say... 20%; altogether HAVs would be punished for overextending by dint of being slow, so infantry ambushes would actually be effective short of applying force so overwhelming the HAV is dead inside three seconds, and if your ambush were unsuccessful that HAV would actually be driven away for a relevant period of time - or even be in a position where you could chase it down and complete the kill.

Let it be known that I rescind any complaints I may have had about single-hardener fitting restrictions, that Rattati was right, and that I/we were wrong.


**also I think Gunnlogi is mostly fine right now**

Tanks are easy to kill. They are immune only to anti infantry weapons. Anti-vehicle weapons usually take them out in a single hit.

There's noting wrong with it if we had capacitors and webs so we could "tackle" HAVs. The problem is that it's too easy to get away.