DUST Search - Who wants to see side missilesGÇª

All Channels

General Discussions

Who wants to see side missilesGÇª

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Operative 1174 Uuali Y.A.M.A.H 563	Posted - 2015.03.31 12:33:00 - [1] - Quote for assault dropships? Fires barages like the large missile turret. This is would not be in addition to the front turret. Just a cooler type of missile launcher. This would do less damage per shot and have a wider spread so infantry could escape better. Would be a good area of denial weapon that damages several infantry a little for other infantry to finish off. Death is a serious businessGÇª So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.
Bahirae Serugiusu Vendetta Reactionary Force 597	Posted - 2015.03.31 12:38:00 - [2] - Quote Wait a second. You are saying ADS pilots let people into their vehicles? The State will always survive.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. 4421	Posted - 2015.03.31 12:41:00 - [3] - Quote Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: for assault dropships? Fires barages like the large missile turret. This is would not be in addition to the front turret. Just a cooler type of missile launcher. This would do less damage per shot and have a wider spread so infantry could escape better. Would be a good area of denial weapon that damages several infantry a little for other infantry to finish off. It is no good if it cannot kill AV, might aswell stick the small turrets or just don't bother flying in the 1st place when you have 3 SL chasing you with invisible missiles. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. This post is an opinion and is related to DUST514 CCP Rattati - "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have got to be kidding...''
Ghosts Chance Intara Direct Action Caldari State 3213	Posted - 2015.03.31 12:54:00 - [4] - Quote i used to be a side gunner in a python :P (left side specifically) believe it or not but gunner double stacking had exsisted the entire time and i was one of the few people speced into it to purposly be a gunner for a pilot friend of mine. oh glory were the days of double skill dipped blaster myrons (when there were 2 damage bonuses you could get and usee as a gunner for insane damage gains... im talking killing sags and suria's with blasters in a myron with a single clip from 2 gunners kinda damage... we once walked out of a game having dropped 9 orbitals... the problem NOW is that gunners end up killing themselves and the gunner LOS is broken so that depending on the movement of the dropship your gun will snap to point in odd idrections. gunners simply arnt viable in PC becuase you end up doing so much damage to your own ship due to the expanded hit box it has now vs what it was in beta. Minmatar is Winmatar Creed of the Minja - "I'm a leaf on the wind" I am Chances Ghost
Operative 1174 Uuali Y.A.M.A.H 563	Posted - 2015.03.31 16:42:00 - [5] - Quote Bahirae Serugiusu wrote: Wait a second. You are saying ADS pilots let people into their vehicles? No, missiles mounted on the sides, like modded Hueys or the typical attack chopper. Death is a serious businessGÇª So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.
Operative 1174 Uuali Y.A.M.A.H 563	Posted - 2015.03.31 16:46:00 - [6] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: for assault dropships? Fires barages like the large missile turret. This is would not be in addition to the front turret. Just a cooler type of missile launcher. This would do less damage per shot and have a wider spread so infantry could escape better. Would be a good area of denial weapon that damages several infantry a little for other infantry to finish off. It is no good if it cannot kill AV, might aswell stick the small turrets or just don't bother flying in the 1st place when you have 3 SL chasing you with invisible missiles. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. This post is an opinion and is related to DUST514 Would still have range beyond swarms as does the present missile launcher. Death is a serious businessGÇª So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.
Operative 1174 Uuali Y.A.M.A.H 563	Posted - 2015.03.31 16:47:00 - [7] - Quote Ghosts Chance wrote: i used to be a side gunner in a python :P (left side specifically) believe it or not but gunner double stacking had exsisted the entire time and i was one of the few people speced into it to purposly be a gunner for a pilot friend of mine. oh glory were the days of double skill dipped blaster myrons (when there were 2 damage bonuses you could get and usee as a gunner for insane damage gains... im talking killing sags and suria's with blasters in a myron with a single clip from 2 gunners kinda damage... we once walked out of a game having dropped 9 orbitals... the problem NOW is that gunners end up killing themselves and the gunner LOS is broken so that depending on the movement of the dropship your gun will snap to point in odd idrections. gunners simply arnt viable in PC becuase you end up doing so much damage to your own ship due to the expanded hit box it has now vs what it was in beta. Not side gunner controlled. See EDIT above. Death is a serious businessGÇª So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.
Derpty Derp Dead Man's Game 964	Posted - 2015.03.31 17:12:00 - [8] - Quote Bahirae Serugiusu wrote: Wait a second. You are saying ADS pilots let people into their vehicles? Only skilled gunners and people they know will get out... Unlike a tank, you need the side gunner to take care of av if it's fitted, because you can't afford to take that many hits. Used to have a guy use my side blaster turret, was terrible, but fun... Got a decent amount of kills, but once 2 people got swarms, it was all over. Personally think normal side missiles are fine for dropships, if maybe they stopped them exploding on the side of the dropship, killing the guy who fired it.
Mossellia Delt Militaires Sans Jeux 2389	Posted - 2015.03.31 17:23:00 - [9] - Quote We use to have cycled missiles. Delt for CPM2 CPM1 MISSION : FAILED Moss-delt on skype
Operative 1174 Uuali Y.A.M.A.H 565	Posted - 2015.04.01 02:26:00 - [10] - Quote Mossellia Delt wrote: We use to have cycled missiles. Mmm, yesGÇª we did. [Takes another swig of scotch] and in no way is that depressing. Ah, memories. Death is a serious businessGÇª So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.

Green Living Gallente Gay Swag Club 1479	Posted - 2015.04.01 03:46:00 - [11] - Quote I came here for sideboob, disappointed.
1e 3peat Random Gunz Rise Of Legion. 51	Posted - 2015.04.01 05:43:00 - [12] - Quote Are we reaaally out of ideas to make this game fun. This thread proves my point. Please enough with the aweful ideas like bunny hop five one four.
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 1205	Posted - 2015.04.01 09:49:00 - [13] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Disclaimer: Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Toilet Either replace your signature with your toilet block, or don't have it at all. Not only is it disrespectful, but it's rude, and inconsiderate to other users of the forum. In other words, everything the disclaimer says is a lie, if the outcome is supposedly positive. http://youtu.be/dtXupQg77SU Dust to Dust Remember the dream you had before the day you were born.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

Delt for CPM2