|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
8408
   |
Posted - 2015.03.31 05:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Gis us the sweet jumps!
^ Biotic Bonus? Biotic Bonus. 
AM Scout component could stand alone. Swap Precision for +X% Efficacy to biotic modules. Alternatively, passive scans could be restored to a useful state, though I suspect these were knee-capped intentionally.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
8427
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 23:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Foehammerr wrote:Adipem Nothi wrote:True Adamance wrote:Gis us the sweet jumps!
Biotic Bonus? Google Doc^ The AM Scout component of the parity proposal could stand alone (swap precision bonus for +X% efficacy to biotic modules). Might not be relatively competitive by comparison to the Scouts, but it would absolutely be fun. If the parity proposal as a whole were implemented, it'd be both relatively competitive and lots of fun. That would make the Amarr scout easily the fastest dropsuit in the game. You'd have them going anywhere from 15-20 m/s, running from one red line to the other in one in one go, and jumping to ludicrous heights.
Nonsense. All of the numbers, including top speeds, are in the Google Doc. No need for flailing or figures pulled from arse.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
8427
|
Posted - 2015.03.31 23:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Joel II X wrote:You mean a potential of AT LEAST a 25% bonus to precision isn't good enough? And that's without stacking penalties.
What I wish was for slot parity between the Amarr and Gallente scouts. One of them should be 5 lows, 1 high at proto, and the other the same as now. I was going to say that Amarr should be the 5 lows and 1 high, but that would hurt it due to not being able to use 2 precision enhancers, but if you give it to Gallente, they would be defined as the all armor race.
If Falloff inner ring could be "fixed" at 5-10m, then we could restore Range Extenders to their formerly useful state. The current AM Scout bonus would then be meaningful, and there would be no need to replace it. But if passive scans are to remain as they are now, the AM Scout bonus will remain without any real benefit.
I'm OK with either path, but something should be done to bring the AM Scout back into parity with the rest of the class.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
|
|
| |
|