|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
2996
   |
Posted - 2015.03.24 23:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Doshneil Antaro wrote:The problem that arises from this is that tanks would be able to mount these and we would have more QQ about tanks kill infantry too gud. I'm not saying that this wouldn't help dropships, just that they would be too powerful on a tank.
Two things-
1: It's a small blaster. That would mean a gunner used it, in which it's a 2+ man HAV
2: Nobody bitched about smalls back in Chromo.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
2998
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 19:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Shamarskii Simon wrote:Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote:There's another problem you all haven't noticed.
The small blasters on an incubus fire so damn fast that damage when damaging a tank does not register at all, not only that but the ammo icon can't keep up with it Damage is in 50% range on Tanks/ all vehicles except viper... Like I'm gonna wing it and say 55/44.
Which makes sense since it's a small turret. That would be like a .50 cal shooting at a tank irl.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
2998
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 19:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Finn Colman wrote:Tread Loudly 2 wrote:Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote:There's another problem you all haven't noticed.
The small blasters on an incubus fire so damn fast that damage when damaging a tank does not register at all, not only that but the ammo icon can't keep up with it Issue with small blaster vs. HAV's is that it purely doesn't do enough damage... Back before they took out the stacking ability between pilots and their gunners I flew an incubus with 2 gunners all with Ion Cannons and it could rip through an ADS or LAV but vs any kind of HP/Rep stacked vehicle it just wouldn't register damage properly. It almost seemed like it was being considered small arms fire. Small blaster vs. HAV is not supposed to be very effective, they are more intended for Anti-infantry and less intended for AV than any other turret in the game.
Which is why people insisting that they should kill HAV's like a HAV in a ADS makes zero sense.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
Godin Thekiller
Negative-Feedback.
Negative-Feedback
3001
|
Posted - 2015.03.25 21:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Shamarskii Simon wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Shamarskii Simon wrote:Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote:There's another problem you all haven't noticed.
The small blasters on an incubus fire so damn fast that damage when damaging a tank does not register at all, not only that but the ammo icon can't keep up with it Damage is in 50% range on Tanks/ all vehicles except viper... Like I'm gonna wing it and say 55/44. Which makes sense since it's a small turret. That would be like a .50 cal shooting at a tank irl. But I think blasters should get 77/63 like rails used to have. And get the full 110/90 on infantry. So that this happens: Rail: 63/77 I, 90/110 V Missile: 119/89 I, V Blaster: 110/90 I, 77/63 V Just for some order... The damage is chaotic on vehicles IMHO
Smalls shouldn't be doing full damage on vehicles simply because their DPS is decent enough to kill HAV's and DS's in a decent amount of time, which makes no sense. LAV's, okay, I would be fine with them getting full damage. But DS's and HAV's no. Hell, some T II LAV concepts shouldn't even take full damage.
click me
Blup Blub Bloop. Translation: Die -_-
|
|
|
| |
|