Thanks for taking the time to come up with actual numbers for suggestions. I know it takes a lot of effort to do so.

Unfortunately I'm going to ask whether we can take the discussion one step back from the solution and discuss the problem, because I'm not quite sure what the problem is.
Are ADS inefficient right now? Do they not perform a certain role they should be filling? What are the goals of this discussion?

I think both ADS are rather ok regarding their survivability. As long as you AB away from harm quickly enough there's a good chance you'll survive any single source of AV. Trouble starts when AV covers the whole map or there're multiple sources of AV in one place. But that's kind of fair, I guess.

The Python specifically I think is doing what it's supposed to quite well. It mops up non-AV infantry without cover with ease. I assume it lost it's teeth against HAVs after the recent changes though. Should this change?
The Incubus isn't in a good place because neither small railguns nor small blasters are useful right now. Small railguns still hurt other DS very badly, but they don't kill HAVs like they used to. Should they be better at this? Small blasters need a different direction. The "bullet spray"-design doesn't seem to work well.
Would a blaster with 70 m optimal and 90 m effective range, low dispersion (~2 m diameter at 90 m) and no increase or decrease of dispersion with some 600 DPS be suitable for ADS operation? A fine bonus would be a heat reduction, as it benefits both rails and blasters.

Anyway, what's the mission statement for this suggestion?

I guess this is where our difference in opinion is situated then. I think the situation as described above is ok to me as a pilot. He has the counter to my role, he gets to deny me. If you don't think so I will accept your opinion, but I won't share it.

I like your suggested numbers. I am just wondering how you came up with them.

I have done a similar thing to what you have done, but my pg and cpu values were much lower.
Here are my numbers