|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2791
   |
Posted - 2015.03.16 00:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
PLC got buffed.
AV nades got buffed. Proxy nades got buffed.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2792
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 00:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sicerly Yaw wrote:i really want you guys to add on to this and not just add useless comments I'm not looking for a nerf or a buff to either side I just want to see where things actually stand
If you think AV needs a buff, its because you think tanks should be easily soloed with an SL/PLC and AV nades...
Used in conjunction with proxies or remotes, you can solo a tank with just this equipment, granted you plan it out (place the EQ first) and then pop them with the weapons.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2793
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 00:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sicerly Yaw wrote:It was a statement maybe I need to clarify but I am only stating my opinion I'm not asking any of the devs to do anything I just want to open this discussion to get some solid evidence on where things stand
K den.
Show us some of your solid evidence. Then we can disprove it.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2793
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 00:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sicerly Yaw wrote:
this was my problem in matches I came up behind an unsuspecting tank placed 4 Proxies threw 2 packed nades and as the tank rolled back over the proxies which took its EHP down to about half, he only had about 2k armor left I believe he had somewhere between 3-4k shields I then fired two vollys of a std swarm launcher thinking he would go down since I had stacked 3 bpo damage mods (the event one) well much to my dismay the tank simply rolled away as it regained full armor and shields in under 3 seconds
Here's where I call BS.
Regen does not happen for like three seconds, and you said it regened in three seconds... Taking its HP down to half, don't believe so, unless a hardener was used.
However, there are other things to be considered:
If it had 3000-4000 shields, it had to be at least advanced because that's only fittable on an advanced or pro tank. You were using a SL on a shield tank, there is no more excuse for not using a PLC anymore. Also, again, was there a hardener in play?
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2794
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 00:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sicerly Yaw wrote:If you would kindly go back and reread what was actually written that'd be greatly appreciated, or perhaps I should clarify again I am asking for help from the community to gather opinions and actual data to help me see where things are standing currently in dust as far as tanks an AV is concerned
I see no specifics... Only anecdotal evidence. Also, there were a lot of questions not very related to AV balance, a lot of "tankers were coordinated, my team wasn't, so is this balanced?" Type of thing...
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2794
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 00:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sicerly Yaw wrote:yes there was a hardener in play but not until all the damage was done and as far as regen goes with the right modules you can regen all in under 3 seconds, now I did not use the SL until the shields were down, like I said I used proxies and AV nades first which I thought would have taken the tank out all on their own
OK.
Assuming this info, the tanker had:
2 shield modules
1 hardener
2 regen mods
Not sure if this is fittable, deco not on a basic tank. If it was a PRO tank, then it is working as intended. It should have survived your basic SL.
Also, what was your fit? All basic? And also, it was a shield tank, so again, PLC is your friend.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2794
|
Posted - 2015.03.16 00:39:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sicerly Yaw wrote:LUGMOS wrote:Sicerly Yaw wrote:If you would kindly go back and reread what was actually written that'd be greatly appreciated, or perhaps I should clarify again I am asking for help from the community to gather opinions and actual data to help me see where things are standing currently in dust as far as tanks an AV is concerned I see no specifics... Only anecdotal evidence. Also, there were a lot of questions not very related to AV balance, a lot of "tankers were coordinated, my team wasn't, so is this balanced?" Type of thing... I see you trying to change the argument on me but I will tell you this I stated my opinions and experiences not hard evidence or facts so think what you may, but I do think I should be able to take out a tank on my own after using all the resources available to me now this may be the wrong way of thinking but as a solo player this is how I must play to actually profit as I have in the past yes there are questions in there that I need the answer to which is why I made a thread now I am glad that you are a part of it but You don seem to bring anything other then trying to make me seem like a scrub which if it would please you that much you may proceed to think of me as such but nonetheless what I have stated is still valid and I would still like help to answer those questions for myself and those of the community that have similar questions
In that case, your argument isn't even about AV balance. You're trying to make it a vehicles are OP thread by showing evidence that you got wrecked by 4 tanks simultaneously, then saying that one tank was OP... Sooo...
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
|
|
| |
|