|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 32 post(s) |
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
9735
   |
Posted - 2015.03.05 07:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Will there be a Vehicle Command Respec?
Turret's don't seem too much of a shift but hulls in themselves do.
Or should we wait later down the road when we get Minmatar and Amarr hull stand-ins?
As long as 4/5 (80%) of infantry AV weapons are Anti Armor based you're never going to achieve vehicle balance CCP
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
9736
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 08:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:duster 35000 wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:"HMG DPS: 38400"
I notice native rep rates have appeared on tanks. Will they appear on LAVs? Small blasters also needed a slight range buff too... They have plenty of range, it's just ruined by dispersion, with inverse dispersion it should become more accurate over time and use that range.
This is true. I can have decent damage at a decent range "in theory" currently. I just am unable to actually hit my target from that far.
I'm very excited to be able to use my LAV as a blaster platform once again.
I'm gettting back to my roots finally again finally!
Assault, HAV and LAV and now Commando is with that.
As long as 4/5 (80%) of infantry AV weapons are Anti Armor based you're never going to achieve vehicle balance CCP
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
9736
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 19:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:
Armor hardener needs to be viable, if you are hardening your shields, you still have them. That is not a luxury of armor hardeners.
However, armor has more health without hardeners than shields do. Shield hardeners should provide more ehp simply because shields have far less health to work with.
Have you seen the new numbers for Madrugars?
As long as 4/5 (80%) of infantry AV weapons are Anti Armor based you're never going to achieve vehicle balance CCP
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
9738
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 02:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Rattati wrote:Doc DDD wrote:Mostly excited for the patch as it has potential..
Have same concerns as a few others.
Scrambler buff... Ok so no one in thier right mind runs shield fits as Armor>Shields... so lets buff the anti shield gun that no one is using since no one runs shields...
Instead of 3 people running shields on the server there will be around 1... the problem is using the scrambler sucks against armor and EVERYONE IS RUNNING ARMOR... balance shields first then look at the scrambler rifle.
Yo Rattati armor hardeners needed some love but going from 50% worse than shield hardeners to 50% better is swaying the pendulum pretty far in the direction of armor tanks. Infantry is already dominated by armor.. we want tanks doing the same thing?
That duration is going to make running Incubus and armor HAVS the only option... 30% makes far more sense given how long they last. Shield tanks have like 900 armor that spells death to any weapon while armor tanks have like 1200 shields that is used as a buffer...
while the regulators are a good start, without shield boosters being viable there are going to be A LOT of armor tanks.
Myofibrils + RE spam is going to get old fast Dropsuit Shield and Armor tanking are currently at pretty good parity.
I agree. The only thing Dropsuit shields needs is a threshold of damage.
Everything else is pretty balanced, it's just a lot of people refuse to use the right fits and tactics that are required with shields.
I.e all lower tier players know how to do is stack health and charge at the enemy at 6.14 m/s screaming and waving their wands.
As long as 4/5 (80%) of infantry AV weapons are Anti Armor based you're never going to achieve vehicle balance CCP
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution
Negative-Feedback
9805
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 13:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
Luther Mandrix wrote:
well if it's meant for AV, shouldn't it have crazy dispersion? it should have alot more recoil and a lot less accuracy. AND it should be given spool up time before firing
What if AV HMG Weapon had a Armor/Sheild modifier that only affects infantry 50 % but keep its 100 % against vehicles[/quote]
AMHG has less RoF by a long shot. It has around the same RoF of a magsec if I remember right.
Also, less ammo until reload.
As long as 4/5 (80%) of infantry AV weapons are Anti Armor based you're never going to achieve vehicle balance CCP
|
|
|
| |
|