Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kalante Schiffer
Ancient Exiles.
973
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 00:34:00 -
[61] - Quote
One does not simply talks about Planetary Response Organisation with out mentioning the word noobs.
framerate>everything else
|
Crimson Moon V
352
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 02:05:00 -
[62] - Quote
ER-Bullitt wrote:Holy fuck1ng shi7 this is like talking to Rampage, almost worse. I didn't think that was possible.
Ok, lets try this a different way. if you cant answer, with some valid points, statistics, pics, proof or anything other than "because I said so" as to why you would say ML is the worst corp in dust because they are "trash" whatever that means... then perhaps you can tell me what makes a corp 'not trash".
Try to be as specific as possible, I am really trying to understand your point, like REALLY TRYING SO FUCK1NG HARD, but I just cant. its so hard.
Skill.
Let how you play speak for you, not what you say.-Naberuis_x
|
Patrick57
9771
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 03:47:00 -
[63] - Quote
DJINN Rampage wrote:Dust User wrote:I'm just glad I can sleep tonight knowing Rampage has recognized our accomplishments. Which one, getting out of bed in the morning? Must be hard living with depression. that's not even remotely funny. |
ER-Bullitt
1757
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 16:38:00 -
[64] - Quote
Crimson Moon V wrote:
Skill.
Wait a second.. you think dust requires skill?
BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHA
"You insulted my boat. No one insults my boat. It no doubt cost more then the entire village you came from." - Roman837
|
Jigoku No ReizaSan
Negative-Feedback
259
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 16:59:00 -
[65] - Quote
Crimson Moon V wrote:PRO- W.O.A.T. Hands down worst corp of all time.
STB-had a few good players in beta before quick drove them away with his insanity. god nova youngcuz ect. The core of STB was a joke though. Especially leadership.
BHD-Removed from PC by KEQ and DDB if I remember correctly.
Dios ex-They actually talked lots of trash in beta and were nobodies when PC dropped. Called out R*S if I remember correctly. Never could back it up.
D3lta force. Removed from PC on day 1 by imps.
subreddit=The pinnacle of bad.
Betamax-after imps were formed
goonfeet-I saw one descent player in beta but the rest were about as bad as it gets.
Molon Labe-The offspring of PRO.
KEQ
uptown456
GAC
843
Immobile Infantry-goons scrubs
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ
Zion tcd
lil omens
opus arcarna
Much crying old experts.-Lots of good that meta game did you. Nerds. Have fun being nobodies.
Feel free to add your own. These are mainly bad corps from the beginning of dust who thought they were a factor and just became huge jokes after a while. I'm sure there are lots of new corps that are even worse but that seems hard to believe.
The list has been updated. Since when was ILL Omens bad?
You want to 1v1?
|
Dust User
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1737
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 17:03:00 -
[66] - Quote
Will you please move us up the list?
There is no way that many corps are worse than we are. |
Jigoku No ReizaSan
Negative-Feedback
259
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 17:04:00 -
[67] - Quote
Dust User wrote:Will you please move us up the list?
There is no way that many corps are worse than we are. I'm surprised FA isn't on the list lol we suck so bad. It's like we're the new Dust Uni
You want to 1v1?
|
Her Nibs
G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance
182
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 19:30:00 -
[68] - Quote
DJINN Rampage wrote:Crimson Moon V wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:I forgot about Betamax... Lool
How the hell do you forget jenzas pants? Those are scarred into my mind. 2 worst corps in history though? Molon labe and KEQ obviously
But now that Cap has decided to take it upon themselves to join KEQ as the self proclaimed "Farming Police" I am afraid Cap just earned the right to be on the list for helping to destroy PC and the playerbase. For being the almighty judge of smaller corps trying to survive, falsely accusing them of FARMING (omg may lightning strike) based on lies rumors ans assumptions. For taking these last districts from the little guys without so much as a meeting or simply asking the question R U FARMING. Really you moniter that sh^t. Start playing the game it's actually fun once in a while.
OOPS, I'm sorry. Did I just blow up your Python
|
Shepherd Grey
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
379
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 19:41:00 -
[69] - Quote
Pradox One - most overrated/underachieving/backpacked corp to hit MH.
WarRavens - aka Commissioner Gordon, because lolbatphone.
Pro-Hic Immortals (anyone remember their 16 flaylock PC teams in uprising?) |
Dust User
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1738
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 20:19:00 -
[70] - Quote
Her Nibs wrote:DJINN Rampage wrote:Crimson Moon V wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:I forgot about Betamax... Lool
How the hell do you forget jenzas pants? Those are scarred into my mind. 2 worst corps in history though? Molon labe and KEQ obviously But now that Cap has decided to take it upon themselves to join KEQ as the self proclaimed "Farming Police" I am afraid Cap just earned the right to be on the list for helping to destroy PC and the playerbase. For being the almighty judge of smaller corps trying to survive, falsely accusing them of FARMING (omg may lightning strike) based on lies rumors ans assumptions. For taking these last districts from the little guys without so much as a meeting or simply asking the question R U FARMING. Really you moniter that sh^t. Start playing the game it's actually fun once in a while.
The struggle is real. |
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3416
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 20:21:00 -
[71] - Quote
Crimson Moon V wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to dominate PCs.
Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to stick around for a long time.
Which is the right way to look at it? I can't say. But what I can say is that these two factors tend to run counter to each other:
Over and over and over again in competitive gaming, I've seen the best of the best coalesce into a team, only to fall as quickly as they rose. Similarly, in every game I've ever played, you've got the average guys who look at things in a more inclusive way, and they are the ones that tend to stick around.
Which is "worst" and which is "best" is a matter of perspective -- and let's not forget that we all, by our nature, tend to self-select corps that follow our own perspective. Well the good corps get tired of winning all the time and leave the game because the dust playerbase OFFERS SO LITTLE COMPETITION. The bad corps stay on dust trying to get better which will never happen. You might climb to the top of the pile of trash. That doesn't change the fact that you are still trash yourself. Its not a matter of perspective. Bad corps who stay together are still bad. That just means you like to play together and you don't mind losing. Which is fine by me and I respect that you keep trying but don't try and act like that makes you good because it doesn't. I'm talking about skill by the way. Not in terms of which corps has the best gaming community. I don't care how long you have been together. Trash is trash no matter how you want dress it up. EDIT-Not trying to be malicious. Its just the truth.
Oh, the old "we're too good for dust" argument. lol
Actually, what typically happens is the "good corps" lose, bruise their fragile egos, and disband.....only to reappear on forums like this and look down their noses at others from their parent's basement.
Not trying to be malicious. It's just the truth.
And if you meant "skilled" then why didn't you say "skilled"? Because nobody is arguing corps like ML are highly skilled. However, to call ML -- the #1 all time corp in terms of kills and WP -- among the "worst corps of all time" or "trash" is simply ridiculous and symptomatic of the elitism all to prevalent in people whose only accomplishment is their skills in a video game.
So, for me at least, when I came to Dust looking for guys to play with, I stayed away from the elite corps. Not because I didn't have the opportunity, not because I couldn't compete, but rather because I've done all that before and just wanted to be a part of something that lasts more than a few months.
And if that makes me and the rest of the guys in ML "trash" to you, so be it. In the meantime, I'll continue to be proud of what we have accomplished, and you can continue to live off success you had in a game years ago and the self-aggrandizing so typical of your kind. |
Derrith Erador
Royal Uhlans
3381
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 20:37:00 -
[72] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote: Actually, what typically happens is the "good corps" lose, bruise their fragile egos, and disband.....only to reappear on forums like this and look down their noses at others from their parent's basement.
HA! Shows what you know. My parents don't own a basement! #rekt.
99% of what Derrith says is stupidity. -D3lta Blitzkrieg
Oh yeah?! Well, I love redheads.
|
CUSE TOWN333
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
2232
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 20:46:00 -
[73] - Quote
why any corporation would care what the opinions of another corporation about how good they are is idiotic. each individual player makes their own way in dust. you can be a villain or a hero you can be a corp hopper or a bandwagon type person you can stay in one corp your whole dust life. at the end of the day you don't really achieve anything because you cant win dust the game just keeps going. corps come and go every other month only to be forgoten. its ever changeing. the key is to get in and collect as many golden tear mails as humanly possible and have fun doing it till they shut the game off. i have a stack of tear mails on my desk a mile long.
KEQ diplomat
|
Ashley Swift
G0DS AM0NG MEN General Tso's Alliance
36
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 20:57:00 -
[74] - Quote
G0DS AM0NG MEN
Now that you're close I feel like coming undone
|
Crimson Moon V
352
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 22:49:00 -
[75] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:Crimson Moon V wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to dominate PCs.
Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to stick around for a long time.
Which is the right way to look at it? I can't say. But what I can say is that these two factors tend to run counter to each other:
Over and over and over again in competitive gaming, I've seen the best of the best coalesce into a team, only to fall as quickly as they rose. Similarly, in every game I've ever played, you've got the average guys who look at things in a more inclusive way, and they are the ones that tend to stick around.
Which is "worst" and which is "best" is a matter of perspective -- and let's not forget that we all, by our nature, tend to self-select corps that follow our own perspective. Well the good corps get tired of winning all the time and leave the game because the dust playerbase OFFERS SO LITTLE COMPETITION. The bad corps stay on dust trying to get better which will never happen. You might climb to the top of the pile of trash. That doesn't change the fact that you are still trash yourself. Its not a matter of perspective. Bad corps who stay together are still bad. That just means you like to play together and you don't mind losing. Which is fine by me and I respect that you keep trying but don't try and act like that makes you good because it doesn't. I'm talking about skill by the way. Not in terms of which corps has the best gaming community. I don't care how long you have been together. Trash is trash no matter how you want dress it up. EDIT-Not trying to be malicious. Its just the truth. Oh, the old "we're too good for Dust" argument. lol Actually, what typically happens is the "good corps" lose, bruise their fragile egos, and disband.....only to reappear on forums like this and look down their noses at others from their parent's basement. Not trying to be malicious. It's just the truth. And if you meant "skilled" then why didn't you say "skilled"? Because nobody is arguing corps like ML are highly skilled. However, to call ML -- the #1 all time corp in terms of kills and WP -- among the "worst corps of all time" or "trash" is simply ridiculous and symptomatic of the elitism all to prevalent in people whose only accomplishment is their skills in a video game. So, for me at least, when I came to Dust looking for guys to play with, I stayed away from the elite corps. Not because I didn't have the opportunity, not because I couldn't compete, but rather because I've done all that before and just wanted to be a part of something that lasts more than a few weeks/months. And who said we don't mind losing? That's just silly -- of course we hate losing. We just don't quit when it happens. And if that makes me and the rest of the guys in ML "trash" to you, so be it. In the meantime, I'll continue to be proud of what we have accomplished, and you can continue to live off success you had in a game years ago and the self-aggrandizing so typical of your kind without further distraction from the hoi-polloi. Take care....Leadfoot I didn't know being one one the worst corps of all time was an accomplishment. Good job.
I will tell you the specific reason why ML was listed. The reason ML was listed is because not only are your in game skills some of the worst to ever grace dust. Your corp is one of the worst corps I have ever played against in any fps ever. Dust has some of the worst players in fps gaming and ML just sticks out as one of the worst of the worst. Sorry but its the truth. Your players are so consistently bad that I find it hilarious you can even take yourself seriously while defending your corp. Obvious meta is bad.
Call me a basement dweller and an ego freak all you want. ML is one of the worst corps of all time no matter how you want to dress it up. No matter how you want to meta up your image your corp is still one of the worst fps corp to ever play dust. I haven't seen players that are this bad since PRO. Oh that makes sense considering Molon Labe was birthed from PROs anus. I understand that after it got stretched out by the community you guys slipped out. Remember where you came from though. Your corp was birthed from trash.
I'm fairly certain a handful of 12 year old CoD basement dwellers would beat ML 99 out of 100 times.
ML as one of the worst of all time on dust. Absolutely.
ML as one of the worst gaming groups in gaming history. Arguable.
Let how you play speak for you, not what you say.-Naberuis_x
|
Leither Yiltron
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1104
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 23:36:00 -
[76] - Quote
Dust User wrote:Will you please move us up the list?
There is no way that many corps are worse than we are.
Bullshit that KEQ is worse than Molon Labe. I think it's pretty clear by this point that my corp history, sans one blip, is what I've always aimed for it to be: a living, breathing record of the mediocre corps of Dust. Why do you think I put in so much time and effort into cementing KEQ's position as ****-tier? Without my exertions holding it back, KEQ could have easily been adequate!
You should shut your mouth, Madden, unless you want me to lose a fight to you over this.
Long term roadmap by Aeon Amadi
Have a pony
|
Ghost Kaisar
Negative-Feedback
10279
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 00:07:00 -
[77] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:Crimson Moon V wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to dominate PCs.
Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to stick around for a long time.
Which is the right way to look at it? I can't say. But what I can say is that these two factors tend to run counter to each other:
Over and over and over again in competitive gaming, I've seen the best of the best coalesce into a team, only to fall as quickly as they rose. Similarly, in every game I've ever played, you've got the average guys who look at things in a more inclusive way, and they are the ones that tend to stick around.
Which is "worst" and which is "best" is a matter of perspective -- and let's not forget that we all, by our nature, tend to self-select corps that follow our own perspective. Well the good corps get tired of winning all the time and leave the game because the dust playerbase OFFERS SO LITTLE COMPETITION. The bad corps stay on dust trying to get better which will never happen. You might climb to the top of the pile of trash. That doesn't change the fact that you are still trash yourself. Its not a matter of perspective. Bad corps who stay together are still bad. That just means you like to play together and you don't mind losing. Which is fine by me and I respect that you keep trying but don't try and act like that makes you good because it doesn't. I'm talking about skill by the way. Not in terms of which corps has the best gaming community. I don't care how long you have been together. Trash is trash no matter how you want dress it up. EDIT-Not trying to be malicious. Its just the truth. Oh, the old "we're too good for Dust" argument. lol Actually, what typically happens is the "good corps" lose, bruise their fragile egos, and disband.....only to reappear on forums like this and look down their noses at others from their parent's basement. Not trying to be malicious. It's just the truth. And if you meant "skilled" then why didn't you say "skilled"? Because nobody is arguing corps like ML are highly skilled. However, to call ML -- the #1 all time corp in terms of kills and WP -- among the "worst corps of all time" or "trash" is simply ridiculous and symptomatic of the elitism all to prevalent in people whose only accomplishment is their skills in a video game.So, for me at least, when I came to Dust looking for guys to play with, I stayed away from the elite corps. Not because I didn't have the opportunity, not because I couldn't compete, but rather because I've done all that before and just wanted to be a part of something that lasts more than a few weeks/months. And who said we don't mind losing? That's just silly -- of course we hate losing. We just don't quit when it happens. And if that makes me and the rest of the guys in ML "trash" to you, so be it. In the meantime, I'll continue to be proud of what we have accomplished, and you can continue to live off success you had in a game years ago and the self-aggrandizing so typical of your kind without further distraction from the hoi-polloi. Take care....Leadfoot
To be Fair, FWA was on top for a while too.
And they were GARBAGE.
Born Deteis Caldari. Rejected by my Kinsman.
Found a new family in the Vherokior Tribe.
Nobody messes with my family
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3423
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 00:35:00 -
[78] - Quote
Crimson Moon V wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Crimson Moon V wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to dominate PCs.
Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to stick around for a long time.
Which is the right way to look at it? I can't say. But what I can say is that these two factors tend to run counter to each other:
Over and over and over again in competitive gaming, I've seen the best of the best coalesce into a team, only to fall as quickly as they rose. Similarly, in every game I've ever played, you've got the average guys who look at things in a more inclusive way, and they are the ones that tend to stick around.
Which is "worst" and which is "best" is a matter of perspective -- and let's not forget that we all, by our nature, tend to self-select corps that follow our own perspective. Well the good corps get tired of winning all the time and leave the game because the dust playerbase OFFERS SO LITTLE COMPETITION. The bad corps stay on dust trying to get better which will never happen. You might climb to the top of the pile of trash. That doesn't change the fact that you are still trash yourself. Its not a matter of perspective. Bad corps who stay together are still bad. That just means you like to play together and you don't mind losing. Which is fine by me and I respect that you keep trying but don't try and act like that makes you good because it doesn't. I'm talking about skill by the way. Not in terms of which corps has the best gaming community. I don't care how long you have been together. Trash is trash no matter how you want dress it up. EDIT-Not trying to be malicious. Its just the truth. Oh, the old "we're too good for Dust" argument. lol Actually, what typically happens is the "good corps" lose, bruise their fragile egos, and disband.....only to reappear on forums like this and look down their noses at others from their parent's basement. Not trying to be malicious. It's just the truth. And if you meant "skilled" then why didn't you say "skilled"? Because nobody is arguing corps like ML are highly skilled. However, to call ML -- the #1 all time corp in terms of kills and WP -- among the "worst corps of all time" or "trash" is simply ridiculous and symptomatic of the elitism all to prevalent in people whose only accomplishment is their skills in a video game. So, for me at least, when I came to Dust looking for guys to play with, I stayed away from the elite corps. Not because I didn't have the opportunity, not because I couldn't compete, but rather because I've done all that before and just wanted to be a part of something that lasts more than a few weeks/months. And who said we don't mind losing? That's just silly -- of course we hate losing. We just don't quit when it happens. And if that makes me and the rest of the guys in ML "trash" to you, so be it. In the meantime, I'll continue to be proud of what we have accomplished, and you can continue to live off success you had in a game years ago and the self-aggrandizing so typical of your kind without further distraction from the hoi-polloi. Take care....Leadfoot I didn't know being one one the worst corps of all time was an accomplishment. Good job. I will tell you the specific reason why ML was listed. The reason ML was listed is because not only are your in game skills some of the worst to ever grace dust. Your corp is one of the worst corps I have ever played against in any fps ever. Dust has some of the worst players in fps gaming and ML just sticks out as one of the worst of the worst. Sorry but its the truth. Your players are so consistently bad that I find it hilarious you can even take yourself seriously while defending your corp. Obvious meta is bad. Call me a basement dweller and an ego freak all you want. ML is one of the worst corps of all time no matter how you want to dress it up. No matter how you want to meta up your image your corp is still one of the worst fps corp to ever play dust. I haven't seen players that are this bad since PRO. Oh that makes sense considering Molon Labe was birthed from PROs anus. I understand that after it got stretched out by the community you guys slipped out. Remember where you came from though. Your corp was birthed from trash. I'm fairly certain a handful of 12 year old CoD basement dwellers would beat ML 99 out of 100 times. ML as one of the worst of all time on dust. Absolutely. ML as one of the worst gaming groups in gaming history. Arguable.
According to who? You? lol Rampage? lol harder
'Tis better to be a member of a trash corp than to simply be trash.
But, hey, I'm sure your mom is proud of your videogame accomplishments! Someday you'll be able to look back on your life, reminisce on your 1337 4.0 KDR, how you and the Imps dominated PC for a few months, and how how much better you were than the rest of us plebeians -- all the while humming the anti-social anthem of how many tears you were able to farm. lol
Good luck with that. I'm sure it'll work out well for you....Leadfoot |
Ace Boone
Capital Acquisitions LLC
689
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 03:10:00 -
[79] - Quote
GAM had some pretty decent talent in an unorganized state once upon a time.
It just fell apart when leadership couldn't sustain itself after John left. And even before then, we never had a true FC.
Only loyal to the republic.
PSN: TerrifiedPotato
I'm nothing more than bittervet without a PS3.
|
Marlin Kirby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
532
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 05:37:00 -
[80] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:Dust User wrote:Will you please move us up the list?
There is no way that many corps are worse than we are. Bullshit that KEQ is worse than Molon Labe. I think it's pretty clear by this point that my corp history, sans one blip, is what I've always aimed for it to be: a living, breathing record of the mediocre corps of Dust. Why do you think I put in so much time and effort into cementing KEQ's position as ****-tier? Without my exertions holding it back, KEQ could have easily been adequate! You should shut your mouth, Madden, unless you want me to lose a fight to you over this.
Don't make me lose to you in a fight in real life!
The not Logic Bomb!
lollaserfocusedonPS3
Got to get those pub stomps over hours yo!
|
|
Leither Yiltron
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1105
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 06:41:00 -
[81] - Quote
Marlin Kirby wrote:Leither Yiltron wrote:Dust User wrote:Will you please move us up the list?
There is no way that many corps are worse than we are. Bullshit that KEQ is worse than Molon Labe. I think it's pretty clear by this point that my corp history, sans one blip, is what I've always aimed for it to be: a living, breathing record of the mediocre corps of Dust. Why do you think I put in so much time and effort into cementing KEQ's position as ****-tier? Without my exertions holding it back, KEQ could have easily been adequate! You should shut your mouth, Madden, unless you want me to lose a fight to you over this. Don't make me lose to you in a fight in real life!
Now you've ******* stepped in it. Not only can I narrowly lose a contest in which I pinpoint where you live, but I'm more than willing to lose to you in real life, bro. Bring it on.
Long term roadmap by Aeon Amadi
Have a pony
|
Marlin Kirby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
532
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 06:51:00 -
[82] - Quote
Leither Yiltron wrote:Marlin Kirby wrote:Leither Yiltron wrote:Dust User wrote:Will you please move us up the list?
There is no way that many corps are worse than we are. Bullshit that KEQ is worse than Molon Labe. I think it's pretty clear by this point that my corp history, sans one blip, is what I've always aimed for it to be: a living, breathing record of the mediocre corps of Dust. Why do you think I put in so much time and effort into cementing KEQ's position as ****-tier? Without my exertions holding it back, KEQ could have easily been adequate! You should shut your mouth, Madden, unless you want me to lose a fight to you over this. Don't make me lose to you in a fight in real life! Now you've ******* stepped in it. Not only can I narrowly lose a contest in which I pinpoint where you live, but I'm more than willing to lose to you in real life, bro. Bring it on.
Bring it!
I'll be the one with pillows for hands!
The not Logic Bomb!
You couldn't pay me to play this game
Got to get those pub stomps over hours yo!
|
Damodred Matari
Heavy Support INC
30
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 07:45:00 -
[83] - Quote
Crimson Moon V wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to dominate PCs.
Some people measure "good" corps for their ability to stick around for a long time.
Which is the right way to look at it? I can't say. But what I can say is that these two factors tend to run counter to each other:
Over and over and over again in competitive gaming, I've seen the best of the best coalesce into a team, only to fall as quickly as they rose. Similarly, in every game I've ever played, you've got the average guys who look at things in a more inclusive way, and they are the ones that tend to stick around.
Which is "worst" and which is "best" is a matter of perspective -- and let's not forget that we all, by our nature, tend to self-select corps that follow our own perspective. Well the good corps get tired of winning all the time and leave the game because the dust playerbase OFFERS SO LITTLE COMPETITION. The bad corps stay on dust trying to get better which will never happen. You might climb to the top of the pile of trash. That doesn't change the fact that you are still trash yourself. Its not a matter of perspective. Bad corps who stay together are still bad. That just means you like to play together and you don't mind losing. Which is fine by me and I respect that you keep trying but don't try and act like that makes you good because it doesn't. I'm talking about skill by the way. Not in terms of which corps has the best gaming community. I don't care how long you have been together. Trash is trash no matter how you want dress it up. EDIT-Not trying to be malicious. Its just the truth.
The nature of dust has seen supposedly good corps quit when exploits are fixed or quit when actual competition arises. The dregs then circle jerk into the next leet corp made of circle jerkers.
There are of course the absolute dregs like Sota who have been carried their whole way through dust.
If you actually check out the imps, they are found nowhere in anything competitive in gaming and never have been.
You are all trash and don't lift, gg's.
Rekt.
I lift bro, rekt.
H'renk Bomborass
|
Stryker Syx Vector
D3ATH CARD RUST415
120
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 08:26:00 -
[84] - Quote
So crimson do you get paid to be this much of an A.Hole |
Damodred Matari
Heavy Support INC
30
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 08:43:00 -
[85] - Quote
Stryker Syx Vector wrote:So crimson do you get paid to be this much of an A.Hole
Your corp is that bad that it didn't even get in the top 10 worst at least.
2160 no scoped, rekt.
ROFLCOPTER.
I lift bro, rekt.
H'renk Bomborass
|
Re-FLeX
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
278
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 13:58:00 -
[86] - Quote
I find it funny when even after so much time has passed, the scrub corps still cling on to the fact that they can actually achieve something in a game that has long since passed away... based entirely on how long you can stick around.
It's like a meat fly clinging to this thrash of a game.
Also please stop trying to justify skilled corps moving on to other games with stupid lines like: "Actually, what typically happens is the "good corps" lose, bruise their fragile egos, and disband.....only to reappear on forums like this and look down their noses at others from their parent's basement."
We had fun, game got boring, we moved on, that's about it... we didn't leave because we were butthurt, we just left because either; 1- we achieved the top and it's lonely 2- the game was bad to start with, & lol CCP promises 3- beating scrubs day in and day out is not so fun in the long term 4- Better games came out
Also be it PC or Pubs, there is no real difference.
Anyway's just came in here to o7 Crimson and Lol'ing at Molon Lab for being so butthurt about certain opinions players have in this game. |
Bradric Banewolf
D3ATH CARD RUST415
768
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 15:22:00 -
[87] - Quote
Talos Vagheitan wrote:P.R.O. Was really bad. Planetary response organization.
My first ever corp D3M3NT3D M1NDZ, was also hella bad
D3M3NT3D M1NDZ was run by a bunch of "buddy buddy" hicks who would give anybody lacking a full set of teeth director?! So glad I jumped ship when I did, and got the boys outta there before it got worse. They even made mophie a director! When I saw that I gladly left, and we started D3ATH CARD. We're doing OK I think.
Az: "mophie's your new director bradric so tell him all your strategies so we can attack -insert corp here-".
Bradric: "Oh ffs he just got here! Didn't the other guy just steal like 300 mil?
Ares Eris was the best thing that ever happened to D3M3NT3D, and 95% of the guys there were there for him. Gave him the honorary seat day 1 in D3ATH CARD!
Lost a bunch of great guys waiting on Az and princess to grow a damn brain?! Should've dipped sooner.
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
John ShepardIII
Capital Acquisitions LLC Bad Intention
1335
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 15:25:00 -
[88] - Quote
Ace Boone wrote:GAM had some pretty decent talent in an unorganized state once upon a time.
It just fell apart when leadership couldn't sustain itself after John left. And even before then, we never had a true FC. I was a pretty good FC
The True Shepard
Rampage GOML
Have No Fear. John Shepard Is Here!
|
Bradric Banewolf
D3ATH CARD RUST415
768
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 15:46:00 -
[89] - Quote
My circle of friends opinions usually only matter to the circle......
Have to agree with lead foot on this though. In the war room, on a regular basis, is very large steeming piles of butthurt. Some guy post some bs derived from some chat convo, and spills his rectum ache onto the forums?!
Ya win some, ya lose some..... but did you die?
My opinion is that the most successful corps are the ones with the stones to stick around after two tons of teeth kicking hits them. After several updates, weapon nerfs, buffs, mechanic fixes, etc.
Winning in PC right now with your entire corp running min assault isn't an accomplishment. When the flay lock was OP as teamwork if your whole corp equipped two it would've been pretty easy to win?!
If the case is "crutch gone, we're gone" than no you aren't the best corp. I believe being the best requires consistency, and is tied to longevity. Some corps I would say has this in spades are on this list of the OP's as well.
A lot of the guys who come running to the war room screaming **** with the tough guy gun game voice usually can't lead nuns to a church, and were probably just lucky enough to be on a winning team with good FC's. Come back to the game, and try to mimic that which you cling to by starting a corp, and you'll quickly realize why most simply are forum warriors.
Just my opinion no one cry. o7
"Anybody order chaos?"
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
3429
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 17:37:00 -
[90] - Quote
Re-FLeX wrote:I find it funny when even after so much time has passed, the scrub corps still cling on to the fact that they can actually achieve something in a game that has long since passed away... based entirely on how long you can stick around.
It's like a meat fly clinging to this thrash of a game.
Also please stop trying to justify skilled corps moving on to other games with stupid lines like: "Actually, what typically happens is the "good corps" lose, bruise their fragile egos, and disband.....only to reappear on forums like this and look down their noses at others from their parent's basement."
We had fun, game got boring, we moved on, that's about it... we didn't leave because we were butthurt, we just left because either; 1- we achieved the top and it's lonely 2- the game was bad to start with, & lol CCP promises 3- beating scrubs day in and day out is not so fun in the long term 4- Better games came out
Also be it PC or Pubs, there is no real difference.
Anyway's just came in here to o7 Crimson and Lol'ing at Molon Lab for being so butthurt about certain opinions players have in this game.
Who's butthurt? You?
It's not our fault you quit a game that you dominated for two months when it was possible to have a 2x or 4x SP advantage from no-lifing it early in this game's history.
You guys were good, no doubt, but you're not nearly as good as you think you are. If you ever had the balls to come back instead of taking pot shots from your keyboard you'd be put in your place and quit after losing just like your ilk have done over and over and over again.
But, hey, you can always look back on that time and reminisce as to how you beat dust and went out on top of all of us scrubs.
You'll just have to pardon me if I disagree with your little buddy's ridiculous assessment of our corp. We (and other people who have stuck around) have come a long way since then. The facts are neither of you have any idea what talent we have on our team or what talent remains in this game -- you don't even play any more.
But please continue shower us with just how great you are again and how terrible we are, then call us butthurt if we disagree....I'm sure your mom is proud. lol |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |