DUST Search - Matchmaker woes, it works too fast

All Channels

General Discussions

Matchmaker woes, it works too fast

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Banjo Robertson Random Gunz RISE of LEGION 462	Posted - 2015.02.20 15:15:00 - [1] - Quote CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata I must say I know the matchmaker 'works' as its currently intended, however I would like to say when I'm playing without a squad, I'd rather wait 5 minutes for a 'good' match where everyone is also not in a squad than wait 30 seconds for a match where there are a few squads on each side with 3-6 people and 1 man squads scattered around. If the squads I'm up against are more organized than the squads on my side, I'd rather just have everyone be disorganized and without a squad, at least I'd feel better about losing multiple matches in a row before getting my first 'win' for the day hehe.
Bright Steel Horizons' Edge VP Gaming Alliance 959	Posted - 2015.02.20 15:43:00 - [2] - Quote Banjo Robertson wrote: CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata I must say I know the matchmaker 'works' as its currently intended, however I would like to say when I'm playing without a squad, I'd rather wait 5 minutes for a 'good' match where everyone is also not in a squad than wait 30 seconds for a match where there are a few squads on each side with 3-6 people and 1 man squads scattered around. If the squads I'm up against are more organized than the squads on my side, I'd rather just have everyone be disorganized and without a squad, at least I'd feel better about losing multiple matches in a row before getting my first 'win' for the day hehe. Question for you: Had a round where we were holding A in dom and having a good fight for the first bit of the game. Then we lost a and suddenly were getting stomped as the defenders saw the match turning in the favor and all started running proto. How would you balance this? We got stomps aren't so easy to ovoid Dust 514, the BEST WORST game you can't stop playing.
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 7817	Posted - 2015.02.20 15:43:00 - [3] - Quote Banjo Robertson wrote: CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata Did I just watch someone have a seizure? "You don't want McSyphilis. Don't nobody want McSyphilis." - One Eyed King
Thor Odinson42 Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 6075	Posted - 2015.02.20 16:09:00 - [4] - Quote I wish you could enter in some criteria for matches you wish to enter. I'd wait 10 minutes between matches rather than get 4 crappy matches out of 5. I'm selling Templar Codes. 2 of 5 remaining. 225 mil ISK. Message me in game.
Thor Odinson42 Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance 6075	Posted - 2015.02.20 16:10:00 - [5] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Banjo Robertson wrote: CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata Did I just watch someone have a seizure? I want a Mongoose Scout suit now I'm selling Templar Codes. 2 of 5 remaining. 225 mil ISK. Message me in game.
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 7818	Posted - 2015.02.20 16:26:00 - [6] - Quote Thor Odinson42 wrote: I want a Mongoose Scout suit now New scout variant: the mongoose. Even faster walk/sprint speeds, one sidearm, 100% damage with sidearms. Because why not. "You don't want McSyphilis. Don't nobody want McSyphilis." - One Eyed King
P14GU3 Savage Bullet 1254	Posted - 2015.02.20 16:40:00 - [7] - Quote Ripley Riley wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: I want a Mongoose Scout suit now New scout variant: the mongoose. Even faster walk/sprint speeds, one sidearm, 100% damage with sidearms. Because why not. The only downside: requires jovian scout v 'Sault AK.0 - Logi AK.0 - Logi GK.0 - Scout GK.0 - 'Mando MK.0 - Masshole in every sense of the word.
Banjo Robertson Random Gunz RISE of LEGION 463	Posted - 2015.02.20 19:41:00 - [8] - Quote Slow the match-maker down, sport, slow the match-maker down. Give us better match-ups, chuck, give us better match-ups!
Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 2158	Posted - 2015.02.20 19:46:00 - [9] - Quote Banjo Robertson wrote: CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata I must say I know the matchmaker 'works' as its currently intended, however I would like to say when I'm playing without a squad, I'd rather wait 5 minutes for a 'good' match where everyone is also not in a squad than wait 30 seconds for a match where there are a few squads on each side with 3-6 people and 1 man squads scattered around. If the squads I'm up against are more organized than the squads on my side, I'd rather just have everyone be disorganized and without a squad, at least I'd feel better about losing multiple matches in a row before getting my first 'win' for the day hehe. If only it would make every solo player wait until they had a squad...... Who wants some?
Banjo Robertson Random Gunz RISE of LEGION 463	Posted - 2015.02.20 19:50:00 - [10] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: Banjo Robertson wrote: CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata I must say I know the matchmaker 'works' as its currently intended, however I would like to say when I'm playing without a squad, I'd rather wait 5 minutes for a 'good' match where everyone is also not in a squad than wait 30 seconds for a match where there are a few squads on each side with 3-6 people and 1 man squads scattered around. If the squads I'm up against are more organized than the squads on my side, I'd rather just have everyone be disorganized and without a squad, at least I'd feel better about losing multiple matches in a row before getting my first 'win' for the day hehe. If only it would make every solo player wait until they had a squad...... When I get 1600 WP as a solo player, and I see one man, two man, or three man 'squads' not get more than 500 WP per person, then I must say the problem isn't whether you are in a squad or not, the problem is the performance of each individual player. I would rather have full battles of 'no squad' people, or battles where everyone is in a squad, which would require matchmaker to slow down before putting people into matches to que up enough potential hits. I don't want a squad of people on my team if they are going to be a bad squad.

Darken-Soul BIG BAD W0LVES 2158	Posted - 2015.02.20 20:07:00 - [11] - Quote Banjo Robertson wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Banjo Robertson wrote: CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata I must say I know the matchmaker 'works' as its currently intended, however I would like to say when I'm playing without a squad, I'd rather wait 5 minutes for a 'good' match where everyone is also not in a squad than wait 30 seconds for a match where there are a few squads on each side with 3-6 people and 1 man squads scattered around. If the squads I'm up against are more organized than the squads on my side, I'd rather just have everyone be disorganized and without a squad, at least I'd feel better about losing multiple matches in a row before getting my first 'win' for the day hehe. If only it would make every solo player wait until they had a squad...... When I get 1600 WP as a solo player, and I see one man, two man, or three man 'squads' not get more than 500 WP per person, then I must say the problem isn't whether you are in a squad or not, the problem is the performance of each individual player. I would rather have full battles of 'no squad' people, or battles where everyone is in a squad, which would require matchmaker to slow down before putting people into matches to que up enough potential hits. I don't want a squad of people on my team if they are going to be a bad squad. Do you think anyone wants another single on their team? 1600 wp? Nice warbarge. A squad leader could have used those points to clear an objective. Individual performance is just that. You won't convince me you are worthwile. Even if you do well what use do you have to me? A single is less than a kid who can take orders. Who wants some?
JUDASisMYhomeboy xCosmic Voidx 432	Posted - 2015.02.20 20:15:00 - [12] - Quote Pubstompers should play skirmish since they want to treat every match like a pc "In a world gone mad,only a lunatic is truly insane" Homer J Simpson
Banjo Robertson Random Gunz RISE of LEGION 463	Posted - 2015.02.20 20:16:00 - [13] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: Banjo Robertson wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Banjo Robertson wrote: CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata I must say I know the matchmaker 'works' as its currently intended, however I would like to say when I'm playing without a squad, I'd rather wait 5 minutes for a 'good' match where everyone is also not in a squad than wait 30 seconds for a match where there are a few squads on each side with 3-6 people and 1 man squads scattered around. If the squads I'm up against are more organized than the squads on my side, I'd rather just have everyone be disorganized and without a squad, at least I'd feel better about losing multiple matches in a row before getting my first 'win' for the day hehe. If only it would make every solo player wait until they had a squad...... When I get 1600 WP as a solo player, and I see one man, two man, or three man 'squads' not get more than 500 WP per person, then I must say the problem isn't whether you are in a squad or not, the problem is the performance of each individual player. I would rather have full battles of 'no squad' people, or battles where everyone is in a squad, which would require matchmaker to slow down before putting people into matches to que up enough potential hits. I don't want a squad of people on my team if they are going to be a bad squad. Do you think anyone wants another single on their team? 1600 wp? Nice warbarge. A squad leader could have used those points to clear an objective. Individual performance is just that. You won't convince me you are worthwile. Even if you do well what use do you have to me? A single is less than a kid who can take orders. I guess unlike you, i happen to think there is room in this game for matches that are filled with people who are not in a squad, and matches where everyone is in a squad. Sometimes i want to hop on and play a game or two when none of my friends are online, and I don't wana bug alliance members to squad up just to leave them after a few matches. Seems like you need to get the stick out of your butt.
JUDASisMYhomeboy xCosmic Voidx 432	Posted - 2015.02.20 20:16:00 - [14] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: Banjo Robertson wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Banjo Robertson wrote: CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata I must say I know the matchmaker 'works' as its currently intended, however I would like to say when I'm playing without a squad, I'd rather wait 5 minutes for a 'good' match where everyone is also not in a squad than wait 30 seconds for a match where there are a few squads on each side with 3-6 people and 1 man squads scattered around. If the squads I'm up against are more organized than the squads on my side, I'd rather just have everyone be disorganized and without a squad, at least I'd feel better about losing multiple matches in a row before getting my first 'win' for the day hehe. If only it would make every solo player wait until they had a squad...... When I get 1600 WP as a solo player, and I see one man, two man, or three man 'squads' not get more than 500 WP per person, then I must say the problem isn't whether you are in a squad or not, the problem is the performance of each individual player. I would rather have full battles of 'no squad' people, or battles where everyone is in a squad, which would require matchmaker to slow down before putting people into matches to que up enough potential hits. I don't want a squad of people on my team if they are going to be a bad squad. Do you think anyone wants another single on their team? 1600 wp? Nice warbarge. A squad leader could have used those points to clear an objective. Individual performance is just that. You won't convince me you are worthwile. Even if you do well what use do you have to me? A single is less than a kid who can take orders. Take orders? "In a world gone mad,only a lunatic is truly insane" Homer J Simpson
Onesimus Tarsus is-a-Corporation 3033	Posted - 2015.02.20 20:16:00 - [15] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: Banjo Robertson wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Banjo Robertson wrote: CCP Ri-tiki-tiki Rattatata I must say I know the matchmaker 'works' as its currently intended, however I would like to say when I'm playing without a squad, I'd rather wait 5 minutes for a 'good' match where everyone is also not in a squad than wait 30 seconds for a match where there are a few squads on each side with 3-6 people and 1 man squads scattered around. If the squads I'm up against are more organized than the squads on my side, I'd rather just have everyone be disorganized and without a squad, at least I'd feel better about losing multiple matches in a row before getting my first 'win' for the day hehe. If only it would make every solo player wait until they had a squad...... When I get 1600 WP as a solo player, and I see one man, two man, or three man 'squads' not get more than 500 WP per person, then I must say the problem isn't whether you are in a squad or not, the problem is the performance of each individual player. I would rather have full battles of 'no squad' people, or battles where everyone is in a squad, which would require matchmaker to slow down before putting people into matches to que up enough potential hits. I don't want a squad of people on my team if they are going to be a bad squad. Do you think anyone wants another single on their team? 1600 wp? Nice warbarge. A squad leader could have used those points to clear an objective. Individual performance is just that. You won't convince me you are worthwile. Even if you do well what use do you have to me? A single is less than a kid who can take orders. Aaaaah hahahahaaaaa! KDR matchmaking would patch all the patches into pure patchitudity.
Ripley Riley Incorruptibles 7834	Posted - 2015.02.20 20:20:00 - [16] - Quote Darken-Soul wrote: Do you think anyone wants another single on their team? 1600 wp? Nice warbarge. A squad leader could have used those points to clear an objective. Individual performance is just that. You won't convince me you are worthwile. Even if you do well what use do you have to me? A single is less than a kid who can take orders. Darken, we disagree on many topics it seems, but in this regard I could not agree with you more. I will take 5 average squadmates who are willing to listen and cooperate before I will take one solo MLG pro diamond tier player. "You don't want McSyphilis. Don't nobody want McSyphilis." - One Eyed King
Banjo Robertson Random Gunz RISE of LEGION 463	Posted - 2015.02.20 20:28:00 - [17] - Quote Some people just don't know how to play a game casually it seems, you do know this is supposed to be something fun that you do when you're NOT AT WORK? its not supposed to be a SECOND JOB
Onesimus Tarsus is-a-Corporation 3034	Posted - 2015.02.20 20:47:00 - [18] - Quote Banjo Robertson wrote: Some people just don't know how to play a game casually it seems, you do know this is supposed to be something fun that you do when you're NOT AT WORK? its not supposed to be a SECOND JOB Oh, LORD and the 20 minute waits between matches where the only comms are noise and people talking about *********. KDR matchmaking would patch all the patches into pure patchitudity.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page