|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2176
   |
Posted - 2015.02.18 23:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:Nocturnal Soul wrote:Tl;Dr I came to the conclusion that swarms MIGHT be killing tanks a little bit more even though I have no mathematical evidence of such claims.... K den It is called observation or empirical 'evidence'. We have no access to those kill stats CCP does. We can only hope they have a look if that's the case. I can tell you now against the projected HAVs swarms and forges will share roughly the same shots to kill. Already ran the numbers based on an AV gunner getting a perfect string of attack non-weakspot.
5% won't. Change shots to kill on a triple modded wiyrkomi swarm. Iffy on double.
In which case you know the swarm will be the go to because of it's ease of use and all that, and it is just as effective.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2176
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 23:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Savage Mangler wrote:No one ever mentions that most tankers run gunnlogis with double shield hardeners, and that the average player cannot on their own deal enough damage to one with a SL to destroy it. No one mentions that the only infantry held anti shield AV weapon is the plasma cannon.
K den.
No AVer saying tanks are OP ever says that the Madrugar is a joke.
k den
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2179
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 23:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Oh shiit.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2189
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 01:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:You must tank on paper. Ive been at 1700 plus and ganked by one missile.
Nope, they are all separate.
1000% sure.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2192
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 03:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:As I always say, as long as 4/5 infantry AV weapons are Anti Armor based you're never going to achieve vehicle balance.
Remove the SL then
SikeGäó
Introduce the real Viziam Forge Gun
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy
RISE of LEGION
2196
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 04:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:This thread became derailed and won't serve any purpose.
I give up.
This wouldn't have required any actions besides keeping in mind, especially if the new HAVs are coming.
Moderation please lock the thread.
It happens. I tried some time back, and it all goes down the same. GD will give you more opinions at the cost of good opinions and actual feedback.
Official QuafeGäó Advocate
Anti-FoTM Prof. V
Forum Scavenger Prof. V
|
|
|
| |
|